Mach at the track
little johnny before I bitch slap you again. 
05-19-2013, 07:09 AM
#2783
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
yep
140+rwhp should more than make up a 600lb difference.
read above
Sounds like you got your *** whooped either way. So now your crying about being to fat to move.
You had a choice.....you coulda bought a very nice low mileage used c6 Z06. Just think.....then you coulda been the fast athletic kid in school instead of the strong fat one.
I WANT ONE!!
Or me trollin on a Mustang site.......oh wait I have a Mustang.
Now it is. I straightened it out.
Rolls are for dinner bud.
Hey Heater !! You see what I mean^^^^ 4.6pimpmaster3000 wants a roll race with me. He has 100+rwhp turbo motor that's turned up so much it blows up every month.....vs my bolt-on n/a 80,000 mile ls6. Worst part is he would probably lose.
I blew that **** out of the water!!
Yea....that's why you sold yours and went with a boosted car.
Kinda like you do your slicks.
Pot meet kettle
You had a choice.....you coulda bought a very nice low mileage used c6 Z06. Just think.....then you coulda been the fast athletic kid in school instead of the strong fat one.
I WANT ONE!!
Now it is. I straightened it out.
Hey Heater !! You see what I mean^^^^ 4.6pimpmaster3000 wants a roll race with me. He has 100+rwhp turbo motor that's turned up so much it blows up every month.....vs my bolt-on n/a 80,000 mile ls6. Worst part is he would probably lose.
Yea....that's why you sold yours and went with a boosted car.
Pot meet kettle
05-19-2013, 07:09 AM
#2784
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the argument is stupid no matter how you look at it. Both engines are far out of production and both have been super ceded by much better engines. It's like me walking in here boasting how my BMW is capable of keeping up with both cars with bolt ons with less displacement and 100 whp per liter. Pointless argument. Both are great engines and deserve respect. Even if a Mach 1 doesn't trap over 110 mph a low to mid 12 with a bolt on car made in the early 2000's is impressive.
05-19-2013, 07:16 AM
#2785
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I think the argument is stupid no matter how you look at it. Both engines are far out of production and both have been super ceded by much better engines. It's like me walking in here boasting how my BMW is capable of keeping up with both cars with bolt ons with less displacement and 100 whp per liter. Pointless argument. Both are great engines and deserve respect. Even if a Mach 1 doesn't trap over 110 mph a low to mid 12 with a bolt on car made in the early 2000's is impressive.
05-19-2013, 08:20 AM
#2787
Teching In
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hio your right we need to do a dig for FUN so we can keep it close! 40-140 might get ugly. I'm curious to know how much that race car weighs? Lol. Either way I'm impressed by your cars trap speed for the power.
05-19-2013, 08:54 AM
#2789
Teching In
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-19-2013, 09:55 AM
#2792
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I heard the guys over at SVTP don't even like them so they spend their whole day over here trying to be like us LSX guys. Sad. 
I highly doubt any LS owner here is worried. There are some fast ones but not a whole lot. Look at the OP's Mach as a perfect example of that. 108mph trap? I did that in my LS1 when it was STOCK!
Most stang guys are cool and the respect LS cars. Its just the trolls here that have a uber hard on for the LS platform they just can't help themselves.
Well guys, its time to head over to GT-RLife and post up about how cool my Corvette is. See ya!
I highly doubt any LS owner here is worried. There are some fast ones but not a whole lot. Look at the OP's Mach as a perfect example of that. 108mph trap? I did that in my LS1 when it was STOCK!
Most stang guys are cool and the respect LS cars. Its just the trolls here that have a uber hard on for the LS platform they just can't help themselves.
Well guys, its time to head over to GT-RLife and post up about how cool my Corvette is. See ya!
05-19-2013, 10:18 AM
#2793
yep
140+rwhp should more than make up a 600lb difference.
Sounds like you got your *** whooped either way. So now your crying about being to fat to move.
You had a choice.....you coulda bought a very nice low mileage used c6 Z06. Just think.....then you coulda been the fast athletic kid in school instead of the strong fat one.
140+rwhp should more than make up a 600lb difference.
Sounds like you got your *** whooped either way. So now your crying about being to fat to move.
You had a choice.....you coulda bought a very nice low mileage used c6 Z06. Just think.....then you coulda been the fast athletic kid in school instead of the strong fat one.
And no.. I have not lost to one... matter of fact, I have run a decent amount of street random races, and have lost to one car so far, and he is posting in this thread. Faster cars out there? SURE.. there always is, and mine will be getting faster also. I have not had the chance to run a C6Z yet. I have ripped the front bumpers off a couple C5Z's and C6 Grandsport though. Looking for a C6Z though. I'll prove my rwhp advantage claim and you can mail me a cheeseburger when I prove it.
And yep, I actually looked at the C6Z's before I got my GT500, and I was also looking at a few used ZR1's.. they don't suit my needs... I need 4 seats, and whichever car i got I wanted to be daily driver material. I also looked at the 5th Gen Camaros, and not a fan of the interior or gauge setup.. and the outward visibility is horrible. Didn't even consider anything from Chrysler because even though I might like chunky(My car), I don't like outright cows.
And really... I'm not that hard to get along with... I don't spew the Ford blue anywhere. I am here because it is interesting seeing the threads. And if we were not here, just think... you would be bored silly.
05-19-2013, 10:29 AM
#2794
So have you... your point? Tell me this guitar... honestly... what type of 1/4 mile et and mph would you estimate Stopsigns car will run in the 1/4, being able to run his 7.76 1/8th mile time? Comon man, that is a solid low 12 second car without a doubt.. and I'm sure he will make it into the 11's this season. You just need to learn to give props when they are due. "Yes Stoppy, your car runs good for the mods you have done to it"..comon... you can doo eet!
05-19-2013, 10:37 AM
#2795
I heard the guys over at SVTP don't even like them so they spend their whole day over here trying to be like us LSX guys. Sad.
Wrong in my case. x100.. I post on both sites, along with Mustangforums, fordgt500, etc. I just like reading forum threads man. I didn't come over here to troll.. but I DO like to get involved in the fun back and forth sometimes.
I highly doubt any LS owner here is worried. There are some fast ones but not a whole lot. Look at the OP's Mach as a perfect example of that. 108mph trap? I did that in my LS1 when it was STOCK!
That's great... my IS350 V6 trapped 105 with a F-Sport air filter.. so what?
There seems to be a bunch of people hanging on arguing about 108 this and 110 that. He ran what time he ran.. its that simple.. will he run better? Yes.. should he run more than 108-110? I believe so.. so what? Too many sensitive people on here mang.
Most stang guys are cool and the respect LS cars. Its just the trolls here that have a uber hard on for the LS platform they just can't help themselves.
And I would fall into this catagory. I respect all fast cars, and am not here to troll.. although it IS fun getting under the skin of some sometimes... would you not agree? It's all in fun, and anyone who would take it seriously needs to back away from the keyboard for a bit.
Well guys, its time to head over to GT-RLife and post up about how cool my Corvette is. See ya!
Wrong in my case. x100.. I post on both sites, along with Mustangforums, fordgt500, etc. I just like reading forum threads man. I didn't come over here to troll.. but I DO like to get involved in the fun back and forth sometimes.
I highly doubt any LS owner here is worried. There are some fast ones but not a whole lot. Look at the OP's Mach as a perfect example of that. 108mph trap? I did that in my LS1 when it was STOCK!
That's great... my IS350 V6 trapped 105 with a F-Sport air filter.. so what?
There seems to be a bunch of people hanging on arguing about 108 this and 110 that. He ran what time he ran.. its that simple.. will he run better? Yes.. should he run more than 108-110? I believe so.. so what? Too many sensitive people on here mang.
Most stang guys are cool and the respect LS cars. Its just the trolls here that have a uber hard on for the LS platform they just can't help themselves.
And I would fall into this catagory. I respect all fast cars, and am not here to troll.. although it IS fun getting under the skin of some sometimes... would you not agree? It's all in fun, and anyone who would take it seriously needs to back away from the keyboard for a bit.
Well guys, its time to head over to GT-RLife and post up about how cool my Corvette is. See ya!
05-19-2013, 10:39 AM
#2797
So have you... your point? Tell me this guitar... honestly... what type of 1/4 mile et and mph would you estimate Stopsigns car will run in the 1/4, being able to run his 7.76 1/8th mile time? Comon man, that is a solid low 12 second car without a doubt.. and I'm sure he will make it into the 11's this season. You just need to learn to give props when they are due. "Yes Stoppy, your car runs good for the mods you have done to it"..comon... you can doo eet!
05-19-2013, 10:58 AM
#2799