I got drug, and I'm butt hurt. Real butt hurt. Feelings hurt bad.
05-10-2014 | 01:02 PM
#501
Staging Lane
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 36
From: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Not really......I would say if someone built a 347 furd that ran as good as my bolt-on ls6 it would be doin pretty good. But fact is it can't even match the overall performance of the ls6. Definitely not happening with furd parts. Didn't furd make a 5.4 32v modular.???....yea in a limited production car. Did it make as much power as a ls6???? nope Keep dreaming snake. Fact is you're wanting to compare your built ford to what is easily available from gm. You have proved how much you believe in furd by not using their major engine parts.
Nothing has changed
Don't worry, I'm sure GM has room for a coupe more liters under the hood for the future. Lmfao.
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
05-10-2014 | 01:05 PM
#504
05-10-2014 | 01:10 PM
#506
At the same time if they could use engines with more than 500ci, don't you think they would? There are rules in place, it's not hard to understand at all if you pay attention.
05-10-2014 | 01:13 PM
#507
Yes your right the rules limit the to superchargers for a reason to... and we all know turbos make power on top end...
05-10-2014 | 01:15 PM
#508
Nothing has changed.......snakes sucks off mr ford his self then runs out and buys other major engine parts to make his furd run.
How come you didn't answer me about a 347 furd compared to my ls6???? We know why
05-10-2014 | 01:17 PM
#509
Teching In
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 2
From: Orlando
05-10-2014 | 01:18 PM
#510
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 191
From: over dere
"lol dude I almost had you and my motor is smaller lolzizzy omg so that kinda means you lost"
"maybe if you didn't have such a gay little engine you would have actually beat me and wouldn't have to flap your yap about ricer math"
05-10-2014 | 01:20 PM
#511
Teching In
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 2
From: Orlando
05-10-2014 | 01:21 PM
#513
05-10-2014 | 01:24 PM
#515
LMAO hp/liter is the gayest argument ever.
My zx6r made 120hp with .6 liters, **** an LS7 that's some sick hp/liter, must be the best **** ever built.
Hahahahaha 
My zx6r made 120hp with .6 liters, **** an LS7 that's some sick hp/liter, must be the best **** ever built
. 
05-10-2014 | 01:26 PM
#518
Teching In
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 2
From: Orlando
Tell me this, why do we enjoy this hobby? Why modify your car? Why bolt ons? Why cams? Why heads? All in the name of efficiency. Check mate.
05-10-2014 | 01:27 PM
#519
Personally I don't see where needing twice as many valves, 4 times as many cams, more weight, larger package equals efficiency. I really don't don't even know why those engines are being compared. Compare the 5.0 to the new lt1. The lt is not in camaro's yet but we all know it will be. Hopefully the 5.0 makes more power by then......it's gonna need to.
05-10-2014 | 01:30 PM
#520
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 191
From: over dere
Personally I don't see where needing twice as many valves, 4 times as many cams, more weight, larger package equals efficiency. I really don't don't even know why those engines are being compared. Compare the 5.0 to the new lt1. The lt is not in camaro's yet but we all know it will be. Hopefully the 5.0 makes more power by then......it's gonna need to.