I got drug, and I'm butt hurt. Real butt hurt. Feelings hurt bad.
05-12-2014, 10:49 AM
#562
TECH Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lot of people dislike gto name being used on that car.
Conversely, we're now kinda pissed about the "SS" being called SS without a forename...
05-12-2014, 12:11 PM
#563
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
YOU don't get to decide... They were BUILT THAT WAY and the rest of the world isn't going to cry with you simply because your side didn't win.
Besides... GM used a power adder more than once on its version of the pony car and I don't recall you complaining about THAT!
Your quick to talk smack about how the 5.4L didn't make more power than the LS2, but then... It certainly did make more power... but not in your little world because, somehow, you think everyone will simply discount the better build because you're not happy...
By the way, it appears the 5.4L was also offered at 422hp... N/A... look it up.
GM sold every one they put for sale... Surely you forgot to call them to offer your stellar advice...
Besides... GM used a power adder more than once on its version of the pony car and I don't recall you complaining about THAT!
Your quick to talk smack about how the 5.4L didn't make more power than the LS2, but then... It certainly did make more power... but not in your little world because, somehow, you think everyone will simply discount the better build because you're not happy...
By the way, it appears the 5.4L was also offered at 422hp... N/A... look it up.
GM sold every one they put for sale... Surely you forgot to call them to offer your stellar advice...In 2008 it would and should be compared to the ls3......where it still comes up short.
Sure they sold all of the GTO's. Just like they sell all of everything else they make.
Your point was what again you old dumb ******?
05-12-2014, 04:14 PM
#564
Oh yeah that's a 5.bro in the right lane lmao
GTO honked and did some weird *** 30 roll, I was in 2nd at 2500 rpm and he was in 1st. I still managed to pull him when I got in my powerband though.
F Body>GTO for speed and 1/4 mile capability. End of discussion.
If I had full exhaust and an intake manifold like him I would have been 2-3 cars+ ahead despite starting out of my powerband.
GTO honked and did some weird *** 30 roll, I was in 2nd at 2500 rpm and he was in 1st. I still managed to pull him when I got in my powerband though.
F Body>GTO for speed and 1/4 mile capability. End of discussion.
If I had full exhaust and an intake manifold like him I would have been 2-3 cars+ ahead despite starting out of my powerband.
05-12-2014, 05:13 PM
#565
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Losing to a cammed 6.0 is not going to change my opinion.
I'm failing to see how a gto is faster? I trap 112-113 as is, with ported ls6, udp, full exhaust it will easily trap 114-116. GTO's are simply not in the same league, they don't trap 114-116 with bolt ons.
05-12-2014, 05:58 PM
#566
7 Second Club
I've never seen such a slow POS bring so much ******* butthurt, 4pointslow deserves a bunch of internets for this. lol
05-13-2014, 12:28 AM
#573
I'm still waiting to lose to one... I beat a heads/cam/intake ls1 gto and pulled on 2 full bolt on 6.0 6 speed GTO's with vids of all the runs.
Losing to a cammed 6.0 is not going to change my opinion.
I'm failing to see how a gto is faster? I trap 112-113 as is, with ported ls6, udp, full exhaust it will easily trap 114-116. GTO's are simply not in the same league, they don't trap 114-116 with bolt ons.
Losing to a cammed 6.0 is not going to change my opinion.
I'm failing to see how a gto is faster? I trap 112-113 as is, with ported ls6, udp, full exhaust it will easily trap 114-116. GTO's are simply not in the same league, they don't trap 114-116 with bolt ons.
05-13-2014, 12:52 AM
#576
Banned
iTrader: (1)
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The gtos have a weight disadvantage i fail to see how they hold an advantage as well. Interior quality yes hands down it wins all day long how ever exterior looks id say the ws6 wins all day, the 4th gen camaro looks kinda plain to me. I like the older looks of the camaro like my dads.
05-13-2014, 12:57 AM
#577
The gtos have a weight disadvantage i fail to see how they hold an advantage as well. Interior quality yes hands down it wins all day long how ever exterior looks id say the ws6 wins all day, the 4th gen camaro looks kinda plain to me. I like the older looks of the camaro like my dads.
05-13-2014, 05:57 AM
#578
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since when do stock 6.0's trap 110 on an average basis, are you on crack guy?
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=205352
All of the full bolt on 6.0's trap 112-114. I trap 113 before changing out the intake manifold, y pipe, catback piping, exhaust manifolds, and running a stock ported tb.
Stall, ported fast 90 intake/tb, full exhaust and the 113 trap will go 115-116 guaranteed.
This is a fact that no bolt on 6.0 has ever touched that, on top of me posting vids of beating 6.0s and ls1 gtos with way more done to it.... what other proof is needed to show that f body>GTO? I'm going out of my way to prove I'm right by racing these.
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=205352
All of the full bolt on 6.0's trap 112-114. I trap 113 before changing out the intake manifold, y pipe, catback piping, exhaust manifolds, and running a stock ported tb.
Stall, ported fast 90 intake/tb, full exhaust and the 113 trap will go 115-116 guaranteed.
This is a fact that no bolt on 6.0 has ever touched that, on top of me posting vids of beating 6.0s and ls1 gtos with way more done to it.... what other proof is needed to show that f body>GTO? I'm going out of my way to prove I'm right by racing these.
05-13-2014, 05:59 AM
#579
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The class I would be in has one gto that matches my time, and even then the trap speed is 2 mph off mine.
LS2 Super Stock
Allowed: Tuning, exhaust mods after manifolds, underdrive pulley, shifters, ported intake manifold, drag radials, CAI, Throttle body,etc
Not allowed: Headers, aftermarket torque converters. No gear lower then 3.46. , Last Updated: 01/29/2009
1) A4, 05 red tomcat, 12.40@111.62, 1.827 60', CAI, SLP CB, MT DR's, Drag Bags, Predator tune,
In the stock class there are only 2 of 32 6.0's to trap 110 mph. Lol.
LS2 Super Stock
Allowed: Tuning, exhaust mods after manifolds, underdrive pulley, shifters, ported intake manifold, drag radials, CAI, Throttle body,etc
Not allowed: Headers, aftermarket torque converters. No gear lower then 3.46. , Last Updated: 01/29/2009
1) A4, 05 red tomcat, 12.40@111.62, 1.827 60', CAI, SLP CB, MT DR's, Drag Bags, Predator tune,
In the stock class there are only 2 of 32 6.0's to trap 110 mph. Lol.
05-13-2014, 07:14 AM
#580
Excluding Juice from the conversation... an LS2 GTO is a damn good run for an LS1 Fbody stock for stock... (both have hit 110 traps stock) and trapping 110mph just isn't as common as it's being stated in here. Little tires, IRS and wheel hop were brutal. Minor changes and they haul some *** but if the LS2 GTO has an edge its razor thin here.
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...c_gto_feature/
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...c_gto_feature/