I got drug, and I'm butt hurt. Real butt hurt. Feelings hurt bad.
05-16-2014, 06:21 AM
#683
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Blah blah blah, LITTLE SISTER... The facts remain, no matter how stupid you act...
The Z/28 wasn't being discussed... SS was specifically stated. I just looked it up anyway and the 2002 Z/28 started @ $22,830... the SS was several thousand more... up to more than 35k... anyway, WHAT did you get for the other thousands? Same engine... same transmission. At least in the case of the Cobra, you GOT something worthy of discussion...
What I wonder with you is, how can such a fathead utilize so little brain? It's hilarious... you pick and choose the facts you want like a lunatic Democrat(not that you are one)... while the rest of the world suffers ALL of them alike...
If the 2002 Z/28 was "essentially the same car," then why does the SS draw so much more money per sale today???? Because, like it did back then, the SS COST MORE... Like back then, the Z/28 was more popular... like the Cobra vs Mustang GT back then...
Who's at fault that GM chose the same engine in their Camaro Z/28 and SS? ME? YOU? The GM dude you're blowing??? Nope... GM! Don't hate the player, little one... HATE THE GAME!
You should go back and re-read your posts, his, and HoHo's on the topic(here) and you may have a different take.
To get a handle on the differences in question, let's go big... LS9 vs 5.8L Ford.... Both supercharged... Look at the cubic inch difference and yet. the smaller engine makes more power. It has to do with MANY things, but ultimately, it's just pretty easy to make big power when you have that much airflow capability. High rpm, massive airflow - power.
The Z/28 wasn't being discussed... SS was specifically stated. I just looked it up anyway and the 2002 Z/28 started @ $22,830... the SS was several thousand more... up to more than 35k... anyway, WHAT did you get for the other thousands? Same engine... same transmission. At least in the case of the Cobra, you GOT something worthy of discussion...
What I wonder with you is, how can such a fathead utilize so little brain? It's hilarious... you pick and choose the facts you want like a lunatic Democrat(not that you are one)... while the rest of the world suffers ALL of them alike...
If the 2002 Z/28 was "essentially the same car," then why does the SS draw so much more money per sale today???? Because, like it did back then, the SS COST MORE... Like back then, the Z/28 was more popular... like the Cobra vs Mustang GT back then...
Who's at fault that GM chose the same engine in their Camaro Z/28 and SS? ME? YOU? The GM dude you're blowing??? Nope... GM! Don't hate the player, little one... HATE THE GAME!
You should go back and re-read your posts, his, and HoHo's on the topic(here) and you may have a different take.
To get a handle on the differences in question, let's go big... LS9 vs 5.8L Ford.... Both supercharged... Look at the cubic inch difference and yet. the smaller engine makes more power. It has to do with MANY things, but ultimately, it's just pretty easy to make big power when you have that much airflow capability. High rpm, massive airflow - power.
Now on to the ls9 vs 5.8. If you want to see the true differences then run them at the same boost........but you won't want to see that.
At some point the the ls9 will require a larger supercharger.....because it flows more air. Which is why it can make only 26hp less but on ~4lb less boost.
05-16-2014, 07:48 AM
#684
Everything else being the same the car wont give a **** if the engine is more or less liters going down the track, but it sure will care if the motor weighs any more or less.
05-16-2014, 08:20 AM
#687
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
Nope, and the total Mustang numbers don't include the Capri (although for 93-01 that obviously doesn't apply). So you want to compare the sales of 2 cars to the sales of one? Even in that comparison, F-body exits the building. Even if you double the sales of the Camaro for the stint of years I posted, the total is still less than the Mustang total from 93-01. That's assuming just as many Firebirds sold as Camaros, which I doubt. So it loses the 2 cars vs 1 comparo, too.
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
05-16-2014, 09:47 AM
#695
7 Second Club
I like food!
Here comes the back peddling...wait for it.
05-16-2014, 09:53 AM
#696
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
GM be like YO lez take dem dollars frum dat gub'ment
Ford be like YO OHC fast n pushrods suck, too many revs be cheetin' doe.
GM be like git r dun, it's only gay if you swallow! da South will rise again!
That's what I feel like I'm reading whenever Mac posts.
Ford be like YO OHC fast n pushrods suck, too many revs be cheetin' doe.
GM be like git r dun, it's only gay if you swallow! da South will rise again!
That's what I feel like I'm reading whenever Mac posts.
05-16-2014, 09:55 AM
#697
7 Second Club
Watch out dude, Mac will give you a swift milkin if you ever meet up!
05-16-2014, 09:57 AM
#698
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haha Ford took gub'ment dollas too, genius.
05-16-2014, 10:04 AM
#699
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
^Doesn't see sarcasm in my post, gets defensive about content of my jibberish mocking post.
Take a shot or take a hit, Mr. Defensive...or are you always this paranoid?
Take a shot or take a hit, Mr. Defensive...or are you always this paranoid?
05-16-2014, 10:07 AM
#700
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts