Full bolt on 5.0 vs mild bolt on ls1
#484
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#485
Truth is, I couldn't care less about seeing your Poopstang. They do nothing for me. If I want to see a Mustang I can go right across the street to the local women's hair salon. There's like 5 female employee's there that drive one. Lol
I was thinking more along the of you posting a pic with a sign over your head that reads, "I'm a dumb ***".
You too Hammer, Mike Morris, Heater!
I was thinking more along the of you posting a pic with a sign over your head that reads, "I'm a dumb ***".
You too Hammer, Mike Morris, Heater!
Good thing you don't care about seeing Islanders Mustang...your car couldn't get close enough to see either one of is.
#486
fairly typical fast92 dyno. notice the 5252 torque and hp crossover and very little climbing power after that.
there is ONLY a few ways to extend the operating rpm of an engine.
change to a larger cal with timing for high rpm power
use a ls6 cam to hide having a cam
retard the stock cam timing which kills low end.
an intake manifold can extend it a bit but rarely adds much.
the basic max torque rpm is what it is.
#487
7 Second Club
Thanks!
#492
Well, in my cars case, the PD blower with back to back runs starts to creep the IAT's a good bit up. Still had the stock heat exchanger on the car. My IAT limit was set to start pulling timing @ 130 degrees. I just didn't want detonation to have a better chance of happening with the additional IAT heat. Just a safety measure.. not saying it NEEDED it... but I did it just to feel better about it. The car made no more power and ran no quicker with the higher octane fuel in the car. So it was still Kill mode regardless... didn't change.
I had plans to upgrade the heat exchanger and IAT temps would not have been an issue after that.
I had plans to upgrade the heat exchanger and IAT temps would not have been an issue after that.
#493
#494
TECH Enthusiast
guess you gotta push it off a cliff. and that dyno is in Canadian altitude. higher than most places as a base altitude.
that is a typical dyno. NOT A HERO OR MAX ASSHAT. not low not high. typical. and intake and throttle body can help only as much as the stock ports it is placed on can flow in the tuning the intake is designed for. placing a tunnel ram on an otherwise stock motor will probably gain a few peak hp over other designs, but is limited by stock port flow.
#495
Did you go PD? or Centri? Centri wont be as big of an issue if you did.
#497
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
HERO STD correction. hell my coyote makes 430 STD.
guess you gotta push it off a cliff. and that dyno is in Canadian altitude. higher than most places as a base altitude.
that is a typical dyno. NOT A HERO OR MAX ASSHAT. not low not high. typical. and intake and throttle body can help only as much as the stock ports it is placed on can flow in the tuning the intake is designed for. placing a tunnel ram on an otherwise stock motor will probably gain a few peak hp over other designs, but is limited by stock port flow.
guess you gotta push it off a cliff. and that dyno is in Canadian altitude. higher than most places as a base altitude.
that is a typical dyno. NOT A HERO OR MAX ASSHAT. not low not high. typical. and intake and throttle body can help only as much as the stock ports it is placed on can flow in the tuning the intake is designed for. placing a tunnel ram on an otherwise stock motor will probably gain a few peak hp over other designs, but is limited by stock port flow.
inb4littleman...lmao