calling out snake95\ other 5.0's!
10-31-2014, 12:51 PM
#503
Banned
iTrader: (1)
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've broken up probably a dozen fights up in my life, I think that solving problems with words is a much better representation of human intelligence than fighting. With that being said, if someone like Hio called me a bitch to my face in a serious insulting manner, I wouldn't stand for that ****, either, but then again, he wouldn't do that.
Words are very powerful and usually can solve everything.
10-31-2014, 01:10 PM
#504
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
**** no. It's right in the rules, this is your typical garage built 302 and 305, no gutting, or weight reduction allowed. If hammer intentionally removes weight, he's DQ'd by default. He wrote that rule, too. The purpose of this challenge to see which one is made quicker easier with engine mods and necessary supporting mods if need be (rear, tranny, etc.) Hio wants me to add weight 
Hio just admit Fox mustangs are better than third gens and go back to crying yourself to sleep in the corner because of it. That's all your saying when you tell me to add weight.
Hio is ******* scared shitless and it's awesome because he's about to be made a fool of. Is it my fault Ford made a lighter car? NOPE! Seriously, do you have a mental condition? If you do, tell me, so I will stop picking on you. You're shaking in your boots because of all the **** you've talked on the 302
Hio just admit Fox mustangs are better than third gens and go back to crying yourself to sleep in the corner because of it. That's all your saying when you tell me to add weight. Hio is ******* scared shitless and it's awesome because he's about to be made a fool of. Is it my fault Ford made a lighter car? NOPE! Seriously, do you have a mental condition? If you do, tell me, so I will stop picking on you. You're shaking in your boots because of all the **** you've talked on the 302
I did not admit the were better. Actually with the 300lb weight advantage they have they are worse than I thought.
I vote for both cars to be scaled with equal gas.
Wait a second here, I'm stuck thinking coupe weights. Hammer and I already said our cars are very even weight wise, you ignorant *****. My car weighs 3200lbs WITHOUT driver. It's a FULLY OPTIONED A/C, Cruise, P/S GT. It's not a stripper coupe. Plus me at 240. I'd be willing to bet my car isn't lighter than his, actually.
Reaching like Michael Jordan in Space Jam. I can't wait to see Little Dougie's response to this one
Reaching like Michael Jordan in Space Jam. I can't wait to see Little Dougie's response to this one
Typical Hiopocrisy response with a built in insult. I too have been ignoring a lot of your ignorant comments, but you must be too stupid to realize that also.
It's probably a good thing that you bitched out of racing me. A fight would have more than likely to happen than a race.
It's probably a good thing that you bitched out of racing me. A fight would have more than likely to happen than a race.
Other than that just more lies from you.
btw.... I would've been down for either if that's what you wanted. You pussed out.
I've broken up probably a dozen fights up in my life, I think that solving problems with words is a much better representation of human intelligence than fighting. With that being said, if someone like Hio called me a bitch to my face in a serious insulting manner, I wouldn't stand for that ****, either, but then again, he wouldn't do that.
Last edited by HioSSilver; 10-31-2014 at 01:17 PM.
10-31-2014, 01:30 PM
#507
Lol at you making anyone look like a fool besides yourself.
actually a 1le 305 did test to a 13.9. I bet that hurts.
so you ran a 15.1 in negative da to prove that the tested car was a ringer. .....that's all you had to say.
Seems about on par for what the car was capable if back then.
actually a 1le 305 did test to a 13.9. I bet that hurts.
so you ran a 15.1 in negative da to prove that the tested car was a ringer. .....that's all you had to say.
Seems about on par for what the car was capable if back then.
From thirdgen.org. Your precious 1le only ran a 14.5@93, the same as the L98's. Any third gen that cracked 13's bone stock is a ringer.
1985 Pontiac Trans Am (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L HO "L-69"), 9.5:1 Compression Ratio, Rochester 4 BBL, HP: 190, TQ: 240
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.73:1 Rear Axle.
1/4 mile: 15.30 @ 92.41 MPH
Skid Pad: .92g
1987 Pontiac GTA (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 350ci (5.7L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 210@4400 RPM, TQ: 320@3200
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (700R4), 3.27 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.10 @ 92 MPH
Skid Pad: .85g
1988 Chevrolet Camaro (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression Ratio, Throttle Body Injected, HP: 170@4000 RPM, TQ: 255@2400 RPM
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.08:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 7.6 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.71 @ 89.3 MPH
Skid Pad: .82g
1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression Ratio, Tuned Port Injected, HP: 215@4400 RPM, TQ: 285@3200 RPM
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.45:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 7.1 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.07 @ 93.4 MPH
Skid Pad: .86g
1989 Pontiac Trans Am (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression Ratio, Tuned Port Injected, HP: 215@4400 RPM, TQ: 285@3200 RPM
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.08:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.72 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.64 @ 92.8 MPH
1989 Pontiac GTA (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 350ci (5.7L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 235@4400 RPM, TQ: 340@3200
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (700R4), 3.27 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.44 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.13 @ 94.3 MPH
1989 Pontiac Turbo Trans Am (TTA) (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 3.8L Turbo, 8.0:1 Compression, HP: 250@4400, TQ: 340 @ 2800
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (200R4), 3.23 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.0 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.21 @ 97.8 MPH
Skid Pad: .87g
1991 Pontiac GTA (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 350ci (5.7L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 235@4400 RPM, TQ: 340@3200
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (700R4), 3.23 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.2 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.92 @ 91.4 MPH
Top Speed (est.): 145MPH
Skid Pad: .86g
1991 Pontiac GTA Convertible (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression Ratio, Tuned Port Injected, HP: 225@4400 RPM, TQ: 300@3200 RPM
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.42:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 7.36 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.37 @ 89.73 MPH
1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 350ci (5.7L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 240@4400 RPM, TQ: 340@3200
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (700R4), 3.23 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.36 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.45 @ 94.72 MPH
1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula "1LE" (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 225@4400 RPM, TQ: 300@3200
Drivetrain: Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.42:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.53 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.55 @ 92.95 MPH
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L HO "L-69"), 9.5:1 Compression Ratio, Rochester 4 BBL, HP: 190, TQ: 240
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.73:1 Rear Axle.
1/4 mile: 15.30 @ 92.41 MPH
Skid Pad: .92g
1987 Pontiac GTA (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 350ci (5.7L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 210@4400 RPM, TQ: 320@3200
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (700R4), 3.27 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.10 @ 92 MPH
Skid Pad: .85g
1988 Chevrolet Camaro (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression Ratio, Throttle Body Injected, HP: 170@4000 RPM, TQ: 255@2400 RPM
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.08:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 7.6 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.71 @ 89.3 MPH
Skid Pad: .82g
1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression Ratio, Tuned Port Injected, HP: 215@4400 RPM, TQ: 285@3200 RPM
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.45:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 7.1 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.07 @ 93.4 MPH
Skid Pad: .86g
1989 Pontiac Trans Am (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression Ratio, Tuned Port Injected, HP: 215@4400 RPM, TQ: 285@3200 RPM
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.08:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.72 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.64 @ 92.8 MPH
1989 Pontiac GTA (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 350ci (5.7L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 235@4400 RPM, TQ: 340@3200
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (700R4), 3.27 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.44 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.13 @ 94.3 MPH
1989 Pontiac Turbo Trans Am (TTA) (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 3.8L Turbo, 8.0:1 Compression, HP: 250@4400, TQ: 340 @ 2800
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (200R4), 3.23 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.0 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.21 @ 97.8 MPH
Skid Pad: .87g
1991 Pontiac GTA (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 350ci (5.7L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 235@4400 RPM, TQ: 340@3200
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (700R4), 3.23 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.2 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.92 @ 91.4 MPH
Top Speed (est.): 145MPH
Skid Pad: .86g
1991 Pontiac GTA Convertible (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression Ratio, Tuned Port Injected, HP: 225@4400 RPM, TQ: 300@3200 RPM
Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.42:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 7.36 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.37 @ 89.73 MPH
1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 350ci (5.7L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 240@4400 RPM, TQ: 340@3200
Drivetrain: 4speed Automatic Transmission (700R4), 3.23 rear axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.36 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.45 @ 94.72 MPH
1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula "1LE" (Hot Rod Magazine)
Specs:
Performance:
Engine: 305ci (5.0L), 9.3:1 Compression, Tuned Port Injected,
HP: 225@4400 RPM, TQ: 300@3200
Drivetrain: Drivetrain: 5 Speed Manual Transmission, 3.42:1 Rear Axle.
0-60 MPH: 6.53 seconds
1/4 mile: 14.55 @ 92.95 MPH
10-31-2014, 01:34 PM
#508
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
Hio, you have no say in this whatsoever. If we weigh and I'm lighter, write a letter to GM and tell them their 80s **** was too heavy, it's that easy. My car is bone stock and will be getting no mods that are for intentional weight reduction. A/C is staying, back seat, full interior, etc.
You wanting me to add weight to weigh the same as him is among, no wait, is THE dumbest thing I've ever heard. You're skeered and it's seeping through your pores.
10-31-2014, 02:30 PM
#509
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Well if we're racin ringers you've been out rang.
Hio, you have no say in this whatsoever. If we weigh and I'm lighter, write a letter to GM and tell them their 80s **** was too heavy, it's that easy. My car is bone stock and will be getting no mods that are for intentional weight reduction. A/C is staying, back seat, full interior, etc.
You wanting me to add weight to weigh the same as him is among, no wait, is THE dumbest thing I've ever heard. You're skeered and it's seeping through your pores.
10-31-2014, 03:42 PM
#511
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hio, you have no say in this whatsoever. If we weigh and I'm lighter, write a letter to GM and tell them their 80s **** was too heavy, it's that easy. My car is bone stock and will be getting no mods that are for intentional weight reduction. A/C is staying, back seat, full interior, etc.
You wanting me to add weight to weigh the same as him is among, no wait, is THE dumbest thing I've ever heard. You're skeered and it's seeping through your pores.
Stipulations bro!
10-31-2014, 03:58 PM
#513
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
You're such an immense dumb **** I can't even break it down further. It's GM's fault if it weighs more, not mine. I'm not adding weight. You know what's about to happen and you're going to cry and add stipulations to soften the blow. Once again you have ZERO say, hammer never once bitched about the few lbs it might be.
What's hilarious about the weight thing is this is coming from the dude who rolls around in a 2900lb car Talk to me about weight advantage, you senile MF'er
I guess we need to tell the world that every car needs to be the same weight so when races go down, you feel better.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
What's hilarious about the weight thing is this is coming from the dude who rolls around in a 2900lb car
Talk to me about weight advantage, you senile MF'er I guess we need to tell the world that every car needs to be the same weight so when races go down, you feel better.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
10-31-2014, 04:07 PM
#515
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where do you race at? How about this spring I come down there and race your LS6 with my 5.0, but you have to add 800 pounds to your race weight to make the race even. If you are up for it.. I'll throw a stall in my car over the winter. Since the LS6 and the 5.0 are a even match.. it should be a good race. How's that sound?
10-31-2014, 04:08 PM
#516
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
I'm sorry GM's 5.0 had to be pitiful, I truly am. Don't blame yourself.
LMAO yeah right. He's backed out of racing Heater...twice Good luck!!!
Hio did you not read this in the first post? Where did you get this being about engines?
Where do you race at? How about this spring I come down there and race your LS6 with my 5.0, but you have to add 800 pounds to your race weight to make the race even. If you are up for it.. I'll throw a stall in my car over the winter. Since the LS6 and the 5.0 are a even match.. it should be a good race. How's that sound?
Where do you race at? How about this spring I come down there and race your LS6 with my 5.0, but you have to add 800 pounds to your race weight to make the race even. If you are up for it.. I'll throw a stall in my car over the winter. Since the LS6 and the 5.0 are a even match.. it should be a good race. How's that sound?
Good luck!!! 
10-31-2014, 04:22 PM
#518
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
He'll bitch out. He won't even take his race car to the track anymore because it kills him that Heater was right about it slowing down.
Heater lives in his head, rent free & all.
Heater lives in his head, rent free & all.
10-31-2014, 04:22 PM
#519
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Hio did you not read this in the first post? Where did you get this being about engines?
Where do you race at? How about this spring I come down there and race your LS6 with my 5.0, but you have to add 800 pounds to your race weight to make the race even. If you are up for it.. I'll throw a stall in my car over the winter. Since the LS6 and the 5.0 are a even match.. it should be a good race. How's that sound?
Where do you race at? How about this spring I come down there and race your LS6 with my 5.0, but you have to add 800 pounds to your race weight to make the race even. If you are up for it.. I'll throw a stall in my car over the winter. Since the LS6 and the 5.0 are a even match.. it should be a good race. How's that sound?
Cool....loser buys wings.