calling out fox bodies
Staging Lane
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 42
From: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Banned
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 528
Likes: 15
From: huntsville Al
that's not what i call mild. A 302 with conventional style heads that would have came on it, a cam of choise and a good intake, carb and bolt ons. I am sorry you are such a butthurt **** sucking fucktard that you have to call me all kinds of names in a novel response. I have built more ******* racecars than many on this site have seen and drug plenty of *** hats like you in every platform out there. I don't need your bitch *** to validate that. When you can debate intelligently then i will acknowledge your contributions. Until then, assassinate your own ***.
LITERALLY A JUNKYARD 302 WITH HEADS/CAM. makes nascar power with bigger inches.
just so you know mr.builtamillionracecars....radical refers to the cam/intake/cubic inch lopeyness and unstreetability, not a definition you make up when someone points out your error.
and you wont be dragging a p-38 car anywhere. you dont make enough power with a small block. there are championship winning NMCA alternatives out there for Ford. mopar pontiac and chevy as well.
Last edited by assasinator; Apr 7, 2015 at 07:15 AM.
If they recalled it, who is still responsible? Third party supplier or GM? Who would suffer from bad publicity? GM may have some suit against Linamar, but GM is also the BUYER that irresponsibly allowed the defective part to be used under their name.
I guarantee Toyota's recalls were from a defect that could be narrowed down to a supplier as well.
Hio, I give them credit, just like I said - the architecture isn't groundbreaking. The fact you want to compare an all aluminum 5.7 debuting in the late 90s to a 60s tech 302 is a compliment to Ford
See what I mean? You can't even have a conversation without mixing in opinion and calling it fact 
I guarantee Toyota's recalls were from a defect that could be narrowed down to a supplier as well.
Hio, I give them credit, just like I said - the architecture isn't groundbreaking. The fact you want to compare an all aluminum 5.7 debuting in the late 90s to a 60s tech 302 is a compliment to Ford
See what I mean? You can't even have a conversation without mixing in opinion and calling it fact 
Yeah, TTAs were everywhere. That's like saying the 2000 Cobra R owned the f-bodies of that time.
Didn't Mike and I already discuss and conclude that my old 87 coupe was as fast as his L98? Faster with gears and shifter, but stock we said it was a toss up? Explain "killed" with something other than your personal preference.
Didn't Mike and I already discuss and conclude that my old 87 coupe was as fast as his L98? Faster with gears and shifter, but stock we said it was a toss up? Explain "killed" with something other than your personal preference.
u mad bro?
LITERALLY A JUNKYARD 302 WITH HEADS/CAM. makes nascar power with bigger inches.
just so you know mr.builtamillionracecars....radical refers to the cam/intake/cubic inch lopeyness and unstreetability, not a definition you make up when someone points out your error.
and you wont be dragging a p-38 car anywhere. you dont make enough power with a small block. there are championship winning NMCA alternatives out there for Ford. mopar pontiac and chevy as well.
LITERALLY A JUNKYARD 302 WITH HEADS/CAM. makes nascar power with bigger inches.
just so you know mr.builtamillionracecars....radical refers to the cam/intake/cubic inch lopeyness and unstreetability, not a definition you make up when someone points out your error.
and you wont be dragging a p-38 car anywhere. you dont make enough power with a small block. there are championship winning NMCA alternatives out there for Ford. mopar pontiac and chevy as well.
BTW, though not mild. Those are some bad *** little heads and 100 or so 7k rpm dyno pulls is bad ***.
Last edited by codyvette; Apr 7, 2015 at 11:28 AM.
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 3
From: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 528
Likes: 15
From: huntsville Al
All modern 4 stroke internal combustion engines have head/s and or a cam. You were obviously the one who is mad with all your useless name calling. Did you really just type lopeyness? Mild/wild is obviously an opinion. I never said Ford motors can't make power so please take me off your list of folks to assanate.
BTW, though not mild. Those are some bad *** little heads and 100 or so 7k rpm dyno pulls is bad ***.
BTW, though not mild. Those are some bad *** little heads and 100 or so 7k rpm dyno pulls is bad ***.
i had a few too many last night when i typed the original comment/insult.
im not exactly defending Ford.
i was correcting an incorrect comment about a platform's potential. the name on the platform isn't important to me.
i was picking on you. you presented an opportunity to make a counteropint.
there ARE few alternatives to make REAL power with a windsor outside of nascar parts, which are cleveland parts.
chi 400's flow 409 cfm.
canted valves. the p-38 utilizes windsor bolt ons.
On The Tree
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 180
Likes: 1
From: Chattanooga, tn