Originally Posted by Poppacapp

Have to use crank hp.

Your ET / MPH computed from your vehicle weight of 3820 pounds and HP of 462 is 11.78 seconds and MPH of 114.74 MPH. 402rwhp sae.

Originally Posted by big hammer

No it's just fun to watch you pound your fist to what you know nothing about.

Originally Posted by JC316

Please educate me, oh king of the bolt on's. In fact, this is an open challenge to anyone on here. Find me an LS1 Fbod that's as lightly modded as Hio claims that gets anywhere near 11's@116.

I've seen plenty of cam only cars do it, couple of highly modified and weight reduction bolt on cars get close, but nothing that close to stock.


I look at this forum and I realized something. Hio is a joke to his own people. You're right behind him, but at least you contribute a little bit.

Originally Posted by big hammer

Well dug did it.

There's also another guy on here somewhere running like 11.6 with minimal mods through an auto. Just because you don't know how to do it doesn't mean it can't be done

Originally Posted by JC316

He claims to have done it, there is a difference. Find me this guy that's running 11.6. I sure haven't seen him.

It's not a question of knowledge. Doug makes it so simple that is should be easy to duplicate, or at least get close. Ported LS6 intake + Grantelli MAF + UDP's + catback + 3.73's + 200lbs of "incidental weight reduction" = 11.96@116.

Originally Posted by 98CayenneT/A

1998 z28: converter and 1 7/8 Lt's w/Mt et street ss
11.99@111 mph..... Get some

Originally Posted by big hammer

Not impossible at in good air. You get the right ls1 camaro and they were pretty light

Originally Posted by JC316

That I can buy. Nice LT header, a converter and a tire. Trap speeds are on par with what they're capable. With the converter and tire it could leave like a mother ****** and run those times.



If it's not impossible, show me.

Originally Posted by JC316

That I can buy. Nice LT header, a converter and a tire. Trap speeds are on par with what they're capable. With the converter and tire it could leave like a mother ****** and run those times.



If it's not impossible, show me.

Originally Posted by ZNix

The **** are you talking about? It was a stock car. No mods.. The hustle was my age and the little v6. Now you just look like a moron. I've never lied about my mods. Ever.

Originally Posted by Poppacapp

Have to use crank hp.

Your ET / MPH computed from your vehicle weight of 3820 pounds and HP of 462 is 11.78 seconds and MPH of 114.74 MPH. 402rwhp sae.

Originally Posted by Poppacapp

The simple fact that you mention screenshotting stuff, when I have already said what my mods are on ls1tech shows you seriously need a life and are TRULY worried about the 5.0s. Because why else would you pay so much attention to the little details? I already told you... these springs have helped zilch. performance version of these springs would net the same. I have hidden nothing, and frankly don't give a **** that you think otherwise. Your jealously is showing. Worry about making your car faster instead of everyone elses.

You are just worried that full weight simple bolt on 5.0s can run what your gutted out tin can has run with a motor swap, and who knows what else "HIDDEN" mods. Man you are a hypocrite to try to call someone out for hidden mods. "Wahhh..... you have drag springs instead of normal lowering springs!!!! Wahhhhhh!!!!"

We can always jump back on your fake assed scale numbers... but you know what? I don't care man! That's why I don't hound you about your mods and screenshot(I LOLd sooo damn hard at this!!! Pitiful! ) Trust me Duggy... I have no secrets on my car...

Originally Posted by JC316

Please educate me, oh king of the bolt on's. In fact, this is an open challenge to anyone on here. Find me an LS1 Fbod that's as lightly modded as Hio claims that gets anywhere near 11's@116.

I've seen plenty of cam only cars do it, couple of highly modified and weight reduction bolt on cars get close, but nothing that close to stock.


I look at this forum and I realized something. Hio is a joke to his own people. You're right behind him, but at least you contribute a little bit.

Originally Posted by big hammer

Well dug did it.

There's also another guy on here somewhere running like 11.6 with minimal mods through an auto. Just because you don't know how to do it doesn't mean it can't be done

Originally Posted by JC316

He claims to have done it, there is a difference. Find me this guy that's running 11.6. I sure haven't seen him.

It's not a question of knowledge. Doug makes it so simple that is should be easy to duplicate, or at least get close. Ported LS6 intake + Grantelli MAF + UDP's + catback + 3.73's + 200lbs of "incidental weight reduction" = 11.96@116.

Originally Posted by HioSSilver

Lol @ stock gns out running ls stuff. You out ran the drivers maybe.

.

Originally Posted by big hammer

Hio did already bud

Originally Posted by HioSSilver

How do i look like a joke? Some like you just don't ****** listen. You think you know more than you.

How the **** does it it proved more than a mod list and vid of the run? He's one of those idiots that think a fbo ls1 should run low 13s -high 12s.

You forgot the spec clutch.

It's easy....you have the list there. Go do it. We both know you suck to much to have a clue how to.

Originally Posted by JC316

No he didn't.




Again with the deflections, are you admitting that you can't find another example?

Originally Posted by HioSSilver

Likely not. Like i said been there done that to one faster thsn you.

Originally Posted by JC316

No he didn't.




Again with the deflections, are you admitting that you can't find another example?

Originally Posted by big hammer

Proof that he didn't?

Originally Posted by ZNix

Sure you did
Improper setup, needs maintenance, driver mod, not geared as aggressively as you... PROOF? etc, etc more of your usual excuses..

Originally Posted by Nick.H

They're built in excuses so he can claim there's always more in it.

Originally Posted by big hammer

Proof that he didn't?

Originally Posted by HioSSilver

Oh i did

And the proof is in hammer taking it even further since they were beung modded similar. His car would easily out et and out trap that nathans. The evolution of nathans car ended because he parted it. After he installed the headers and tube k the car woulda likely ran around a 11.6 at 118+

Eat that **** muh bitch

Next he'll be telling you that your car didn't run what you said soule because he can't figure out how it's done.

Don't be mad brah. Your built one will be lucky to keep up with my bolt on ls6


Seems like all you **** are ones throwing around excuses