Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Run in with a new C7 GS....some notes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2017, 11:25 PM
  #141  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
I love how your **** always manages to run record times "bone stock".

Anyway, here is an SS running against a regular cab Hemi. Hemi has 500lbs on the SS, but the SS has AWD traction and better gearing.

SS 14.99@89.05
Hemi 15.11@89.06

Less than 1/10th of a second and identical MPH, with the Hemi closing the gap all track. That's an LQ9.

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevr...ck-comparison/

Oh, and here is a 2500 hemi ram running 16.2@85, which is better than any other magazine tested LQ4 2500HD, and only 1/10th behind your record imaginary time.

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/dodge.../2003/toy-win/

As for a gen 2 8 speed auto hemi. Yeah, 14.1@99, good luck with that.

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...mi-test-review
You can't even ******* read and understand your own links dumbass. The ss was 500lb heavier than the hemi and out ran it. The ****** hemi never closed the gap. It steadily grew till they shut them down at 100 mph ypu ****** stupid ****.

From your link stupid ****.

Ss left hemi right



Again...ss left hemi right

Look at the gappin that happens after 80mph




The ss don't even have better gearing like you claim. 4speed auto vs 5speed auto.



My **** runs as it should. Then you go comparing a 2wd hemi 2500 to me and it loses. Btw my truck weighs 700lb more than that truck. My times are also not corrected as most mags use corrected times to keep their testing consistent. My times are not corrected and it was hot as ***** the day i ran it.


Then your dumbass tries to use a 2wd rcsb 1500 to compare to my 2500hd ecsb 4x4.....are you a ******* idiot?

Did you notice that the article said the 6.2 is right there with that little truck. But oh wait.....the 6.2 is in a crew cab 4x4 model truck all loaded up. Probably about 1k lb heavier.



Originally Posted by JC316
Classic case of great motor surrounded by too much weight. Put a 5.7L hemi in a 4th gen camaro, and I think it beats the LS1. Hell, if you look at the 392 vs LT1, the 392 has 30-40 HP on the LT1 at the tire, it's just stuck in the fat *** challenger.
You're a ******* idiot. The 5.7 hemi wouldn't touch the ls1 back when both were produced.

How bout this....do another swap with a older 5.7 hemi dumbass so i can laugh at you not leaving the 14s again.

The lt1 is a very mild engine. And as far as i can tell it seems to br **** stomping those hemis.

Originally Posted by islander033
I confuse easily it seems. You said no vids...but you just mentions 2 vids?
I have one vid of jason driving the notch. Jason has one vid of phil and i that won't send because to big so he said. Shitty run anyway so no care. So no vids to speak of.

Last edited by HioSSilver; 10-11-2017 at 11:50 PM.
Old 10-12-2017, 01:23 AM
  #142  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You can't even ******* read and understand your own links dumbass. The ss was 500lb heavier than the hemi and out ran it. The ****** hemi never closed the gap. It steadily grew till they shut them down at 100 mph ypu ****** stupid ****.

From your link stupid ****.

Ss left hemi right

Again...ss left hemi right

Look at the gappin that happens after 80mph




The ss don't even have better gearing like you claim. 4speed auto vs 5speed auto.



My **** runs as it should. Then you go comparing a 2wd hemi 2500 to me and it loses. Btw my truck weighs 700lb more than that truck. My times are also not corrected as most mags use corrected times to keep their testing consistent. My times are not corrected and it was hot as ***** the day i ran it.


Then your dumbass tries to use a 2wd rcsb 1500 to compare to my 2500hd ecsb 4x4.....are you a ******* idiot?

Did you notice that the article said the 6.2 is right there with that little truck. But oh wait.....the 6.2 is in a crew cab 4x4 model truck all loaded up. Probably about 1k lb heavier.





You're a ******* idiot. The 5.7 hemi wouldn't touch the ls1 back when both were produced.

How bout this....do another swap with a older 5.7 hemi dumbass so i can laugh at you not leaving the 14s again.

The lt1 is a very mild engine. And as far as i can tell it seems to br **** stomping those hemis.


My god you're an idiot. I already said that the hemi weighed less, but the SS has better traction and gearing. Again, you don't know what the **** you're talking about with the gearing.

4L65-E ratios: 1st: 3.06, 2nd: 1.62, 3rd: 1.00, 4th: 0.70
545RE ratios: 1st 3.00, 2nd 1.67, 3rd 1.00, 4th 0.75, 5th 0.67

Almost identical, so the 4.10 gearing and AWD launch would indeed help the SS.

Your truck didn't run a 16.1 bone stock, you're lying, just like you lie about everything else GM. I can't find one other 2500hd that runs those times. Car and driver got a 17.0@83, and motor trend got 16.8@84, yet somehow you managed a 16.1 in "bad conditions". Sell that bullshit to someone else, preferably someone as brainless as you.

The only reason I was comparing a RCSB to yours is because you mentioned the 8 speed auto, which would obliterate you.


As for the swap, I don't need to, there is an easy comparison.

04 GTO 6m - 3800lbs - 13.6@104.7
09 Challenger R/T 6m - 4150lbs - 13.6@104.9

Now, I know you're going to be whining about the 09 challenger having the gen 2 5.7L hemi. So lets look at this...

04 GTO 4A - 3725lbs - 13.85@101
08 Charger R/T 5A - 4100lbs - 14.1@102

More weight, same trap speed = hemi win.


Oh and for ***** and giggles. 2010 Ram 2500HD 4x4 crew cab 5 speed auto. 15.4@95. Cry some more bitch.

Old 10-12-2017, 06:42 AM
  #143  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by assasinator
i wont be racing friday unless the track will ignore that i dont have a overflow. i think im going to ziptie a plastic coke bottle with a hose into it. ill see if they will let me run.
I don't know how Huntsville is. My car has never been teched and the only thing that has ever been said to me was to where a helmet (once). Lassiter, Steele, and Montgomery are all laid back on TNT days

Last edited by Jtm2085; 10-12-2017 at 10:18 AM.
Old 10-12-2017, 08:41 AM
  #144  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
My god you're an idiot. I already said that the hemi weighed less, but the SS has better traction and gearing. Again, you don't know what the **** you're talking about with the gearing.

4L65-E ratios: 1st: 3.06, 2nd: 1.62, 3rd: 1.00, 4th: 0.70
545RE ratios: 1st 3.00, 2nd 1.67, 3rd 1.00, 4th 0.75, 5th 0.67

Almost identical, so the 4.10 gearing and AWD launch would indeed help the SS.

Your truck didn't run a 16.1 bone stock, you're lying, just like you lie about everything else GM. I can't find one other 2500hd that runs those times. Car and driver got a 17.0@83, and motor trend got 16.8@84, yet somehow you managed a 16.1 in "bad conditions". Sell that bullshit to someone else, preferably someone as brainless as you.

The only reason I was comparing a RCSB to yours is because you mentioned the 8 speed auto, which would obliterate you.


As for the swap, I don't need to, there is an easy comparison.

04 GTO 6m - 3800lbs - 13.6@104.7
09 Challenger R/T 6m - 4150lbs - 13.6@104.9

Now, I know you're going to be whining about the 09 challenger having the gen 2 5.7L hemi. So lets look at this...

04 GTO 4A - 3725lbs - 13.85@101
08 Charger R/T 5A - 4100lbs - 14.1@102

More weight, same trap speed = hemi win.


Oh and for ***** and giggles. 2010 Ram 2500HD 4x4 crew cab 5 speed auto. 15.4@95. Cry some more bitch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWHtuHwp-9g
You acted like the hemi truck was hwavier you dumb ****. And even if you didn't mean it like that your were ******* retarded to post it. It did nothing but make the hemi truck look worse by being 500lb lighter and still losing you idiot.

Yea man.....i ran 16.1 in my 2500hd. It wears hemi trucks out. Nbd....just like every other gm car I've been it it's not hard to beat the mags. Didges and furds seem to struggle to match the mags. Just how it is. My uncle went 15.7 in a rcsb 4x4 5.3 truck the same day.

Yup gearing pretty close as i said with the hemi having a extra gear. You acted like there was some huge gearing desperatey.


If you believe that hemi 2500hd cc truck went 15.4 you're dumber than you look after posting a rcsb 1500 went 15.1 you dumb ****. Even the trap screams something is up.

How bout leaving your mothers basement bitch and goin out in the real world. You're the most worthless pos on this site.
Old 10-12-2017, 09:38 AM
  #145  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jtm2085
I don't know Huntsville is. My car has never been teched and the only thing that has ever been said to me was to where a helmet (once). Lassiter, Steele, and Montgomery are all laid back on TNT days
The tracks may be different down here. Union hill and Clarksville tech the cars and I had a tech number I put on the car to identify it.
I’m putting a coke bottle. Screw it.

My interface USB port just broke. Looks like the tune I put on it stays. I’m at 18 psi now. I gotta log it on the way home.
Old 10-12-2017, 10:19 AM
  #146  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I hear ya, let us know how it goes!
Old 10-12-2017, 10:27 AM
  #147  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

The second overdrive on my M6 car really improves my quarter mile times.
Old 10-12-2017, 11:40 AM
  #148  
Teching In
 
MACHXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jtm2085
I don't know how Huntsville is. My car has never been teched and the only thing that has ever been said to me was to where a helmet (once). Lassiter, Steele, and Montgomery are all laid back on TNT days
Those tracks are the best because they are so laid back. There is an 1/8 mile track here in the middle of a tobacco field, that still flags you since there is no tree. For the longest time they did not even have a working timing system for ET and traps.
Old 10-12-2017, 12:14 PM
  #149  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You acted like the hemi truck was hwavier you dumb ****. And even if you didn't mean it like that your were ******* retarded to post it. It did nothing but make the hemi truck look worse by being 500lb lighter and still losing you idiot.

Yea man.....i ran 16.1 in my 2500hd. It wears hemi trucks out. Nbd....just like every other gm car I've been it it's not hard to beat the mags. Didges and furds seem to struggle to match the mags. Just how it is. My uncle went 15.7 in a rcsb 4x4 5.3 truck the same day.

Yup gearing pretty close as i said with the hemi having a extra gear. You acted like there was some huge gearing desperatey.


If you believe that hemi 2500hd cc truck went 15.4 you're dumber than you look after posting a rcsb 1500 went 15.1 you dumb ****. Even the trap screams something is up.

How bout leaving your mothers basement bitch and goin out in the real world. You're the most worthless pos on this site.
Based on how I worded it, I can see why it would confuse a simpleton like you, but I was showing the strengths of both trucks. Hemi weighed less, SS had more traction and gear.


You know as well as I do that neither the hemi, nor the SS were going to be out of third gear by the end of the 1/4 mile. You thought there was a huge difference and I made you look like a jackass again. Quite embarrassing for you.

I've checked forums as well, no one has come close to a 16.1 bone stock. I've caught you lying on mods in the past, so while you may have gone 16.1, it damned sure wasn't bone stock.

What, no response to the hemi running right with an LS1, even being at a 400lb disadvantage? Did I shatter your little fantasy where the LS is unbeatable?

Video proof right in your face, and you deny it. Stips and denial, big shocker.
Old 10-12-2017, 12:56 PM
  #150  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Hio getting e-wrecked again.
Old 10-12-2017, 01:46 PM
  #151  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snake95
Hio getting e-wrecked again.
As expected. That's what happens to shady peeps.
Old 10-12-2017, 04:09 PM
  #152  
Teching In
 
meddlecho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Pit
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought an 01 Ram with the 5.2 just to haul some stuff. Thing is a ******* boat anchor, haha.
Old 10-12-2017, 04:50 PM
  #153  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by meddlecho
I bought an 01 Ram with the 5.2 just to haul some stuff. Thing is a ******* boat anchor, haha.
No question. Even the 5.9L in those years was barely passable. They get dismal gas mileage to boot.
Old 10-12-2017, 06:44 PM
  #154  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

6.2>Heni>ecobootht>5.3=5.0
Old 10-12-2017, 06:56 PM
  #155  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Lawhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: \
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hio lives his life one magazine article at at time
Old 10-12-2017, 07:47 PM
  #156  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Based on how I worded it, I can see why it would confuse a simpleton like you, but I was showing the strengths of both trucks. Hemi weighed less, SS had more traction and gear.


You know as well as I do that neither the hemi, nor the SS were going to be out of third gear by the end of the 1/4 mile. You thought there was a huge difference and I made you look like a jackass again. Quite embarrassing for you.

I've checked forums as well, no one has come close to a 16.1 bone stock. I've caught you lying on mods in the past, so while you may have gone 16.1, it damned sure wasn't bone stock.

What, no response to the hemi running right with an LS1, even being at a 400lb disadvantage? Did I shatter your little fantasy where the LS is unbeatable?

Video proof right in your face, and you deny it. Stips and denial, big shocker.
How you worded it was how a dumbass would. You were trying to make someone believe the hemi was the heavier truck. Traction was not the deciding factor of that test....neither was gear. Fact is the hemi got it's *** handed to it by a heavier truck.

You've never caught me lying in ****. You wanna know why??? I don't give enough ***** to lie about it. I stated what the truck runs. It runs well. Ran well stock.

I responded to that you stupud ****.

It's odd how you will believe a nag when it suits you. Like that 2500 hemi only running .3 off and 6mph more than the other hemi you posted all while weighing 1500lb more. You're a ******* idiot.

But you've owned all these trucks. And never ran none if them at the track......nuff said


Now continue with your 14sec sec builds.

Have you ever done anything even remotely impressive car wise? How bout posting some of that ****.....raving fagg

Originally Posted by snake95
Hio getting e-wrecked again.
Lol......aaahhh no
Originally Posted by islander033
As expected. That's what happens to shady peeps.
You are shady. No doubts on that.
Originally Posted by Lawhead
Hio lives his life one magazine article at at time
Strange how you direct that to me and not jc wuth all his mag links fool

But since you mentioned it

http://www.motortrend.com/news/ram-2...ear-contender/

Anyone else find it strange the 6.4 is .8 off the 5.7 and 8mph down?

Yall should invite jc in your kik group.

Last edited by HioSSilver; 10-12-2017 at 08:17 PM.
Old 10-12-2017, 09:10 PM
  #157  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
How you worded it was how a dumbass would. You were trying to make someone believe the hemi was the heavier truck. Traction was not the deciding factor of that test....neither was gear. Fact is the hemi got it's *** handed to it by a heavier truck.

You've never caught me lying in ****. You wanna know why??? I don't give enough ***** to lie about it. I stated what the truck runs. It runs well. Ran well stock.

I responded to that you stupud ****.

It's odd how you will believe a nag when it suits you. Like that 2500 hemi only running .3 off and 6mph more than the other hemi you posted all while weighing 1500lb more. You're a ******* idiot.

But you've owned all these trucks. And never ran none if them at the track......nuff said


Now continue with your 14sec sec builds.

Have you ever done anything even remotely impressive car wise? How bout posting some of that ****.....raving fagg


Lol......aaahhh no

You are shady. No doubts on that.


Strange how you direct that to me and not jc wuth all his mag links fool

But since you mentioned it

http://www.motortrend.com/news/ram-2...ear-contender/

Anyone else find it strange the 6.4 is .8 off the 5.7 and 8mph down?

Yall should invite jc in your kik group.
Traction or gear wasn't a factor? The SS got out to an early lead, thanks to it's traction, the hemi pulled back in the mid range, and the SS squeaked by it on the top end. Hemi gets the launch that the SS had, it's over.

The 15.1 hemi was a Gen 1 hemi, the 15.6 was a gen 2 hemi, which you claim to have no problems with, and then the 8 speed hemi RCSB was a 14.1

As for the 6.4L test, the 6.4L has 27HP and 30lbs ft of torque over the 5.7L and you're comparing a low option truck to a loaded Longhorn. 6000lbs to 7466.

And you didn't respond to the GTO vs Challenger/charger comment, you must not be able to see through the tears.
Old 10-12-2017, 10:47 PM
  #158  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

The two of you should get a room and the rest of you cheerleaders should gather around the bed. This **** is pathetic. Trucks are made to pull racecars. Get a ******* life. LOL
Old 10-12-2017, 11:47 PM
  #159  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

A 6.2 chevie truck is a race car
Old 10-13-2017, 12:11 AM
  #160  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by codyvette
The two of you should get a room and the rest of you cheerleaders should gather around the bed. This **** is pathetic. Trucks are made to pull racecars. Get a ******* life. LOL
But it's so much fun to poke hio with a stick. He gets so worked up over the fact that GM can actually be beat.


Quick Reply: Run in with a new C7 GS....some notes...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.