Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Epic SRK B/S thread of 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2022, 11:45 PM
  #8441  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
If it's an early 392, or a 6 speed it would be real close between the C5 and it, A8 392 should eat it alive. Plus I am just talking about the engine itself, not the car it's in, because we all know the LX cars are seriously overweight. Doing some bench racing, the Camaro is like .2 and 2mph faster than the Challenger, while weighing 600-700lbs less. I liked the **** out of the LT1 in my Camaro, but I like the 392 more.
I’ve seen a few bolt on 392s that perform well but most seem to have basic bolt ons and 90lbs of led lighting/interior mods so I just don’t think the crowd is interested in modding them for performance, 🤷

Also agree a newer 392 auto would smash a stock c5.
Old 10-04-2022, 06:54 PM
  #8442  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Nah man, I've had the LT1, 392 ***** all over it. Challenger has 700lbs more *** than the camaro and hangs right with it, make a 3700lbs Scat pack and nothing touches it.
Agree comparing both in stock form. The 392 is more optimized from the factory with a larger cam and SD tune. once you start modding equally, the LT1 picks up a lot. Just basic ported heads/cam LT1 builds make 600whp on pump E. 416-427 LTx motors are making 750+whp NA with stock castings on C85. Either way the 392's are pretty stout engines for low compression. They have some really good heads. Nobody really pushes them NA. It seems those that want more power move up to the Hellcat platform because the 392's even with forged pistons and boost don't seem to run as well as Hellcats.

Last edited by kinglt-1; 10-04-2022 at 07:03 PM.
Old 10-05-2022, 03:57 PM
  #8443  
TECH Enthusiast
 
AnnivSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 588
Received 212 Likes on 174 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
Agree comparing both in stock form. The 392 is more optimized from the factory with a larger cam and SD tune. once you start modding equally, the LT1 picks up a lot. Just basic ported heads/cam LT1 builds make 600whp on pump E. 416-427 LTx motors are making 750+whp NA with stock castings on C85. Either way the 392's are pretty stout engines for low compression. They have some really good heads. Nobody really pushes them NA. It seems those that want more power move up to the Hellcat platform because the 392's even with forged pistons and boost don't seem to run as well as Hellcats.

Sounds like I need more procharger.
Old 10-06-2022, 01:04 PM
  #8444  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
Agree comparing both in stock form. The 392 is more optimized from the factory with a larger cam and SD tune. once you start modding equally, the LT1 picks up a lot. Just basic ported heads/cam LT1 builds make 600whp on pump E. 416-427 LTx motors are making 750+whp NA with stock castings on C85. Either way the 392's are pretty stout engines for low compression. They have some really good heads. Nobody really pushes them NA. It seems those that want more power move up to the Hellcat platform because the 392's even with forged pistons and boost don't seem to run as well as Hellcats.
I can agree with that. Not a whole lot of NA support for the 392.
Old 10-07-2022, 12:13 AM
  #8445  
Banned
 
HeatSeeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: US of A
Posts: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

392's are trash AF
Old 10-07-2022, 03:52 PM
  #8446  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HeatSeeker
392's are trash AF
Nah, eats the LS alive. Hemi's have always taken Chevy's lunch money.
Old 10-07-2022, 04:22 PM
  #8447  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Nah man, I've had the LT1, 392 ***** all over it. Challenger has 700lbs more *** than the camaro and hangs right with it, make a 3700lbs Scat pack and nothing touches it.
you can say that all you want. But that's not what their track times say.
Old 10-08-2022, 01:04 AM
  #8448  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
you can say that all you want. But that's not what their track times say.
11.2@120 from a CAI only 1320 Scat running almost 4Klbs with driver. That's still heavier than the 6th gen and miles ahead of it on the fast lists. Sorry, the hemi is a better engine, stuck in a fat *** car.
Old 10-08-2022, 07:50 AM
  #8449  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
11.2@120 from a CAI only 1320 Scat running almost 4Klbs with driver. That's still heavier than the 6th gen and miles ahead of it on the fast lists. Sorry, the hemi is a better engine, stuck in a fat *** car.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWPsvWpfico
odd how thats all the faster that one went on here fully gutted and fbo. **** the vid you posted is faster than the hellcats even. But that's ok....you can believe that **** if you like.
Old 10-08-2022, 06:58 PM
  #8450  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
odd how thats all the faster that one went on here fully gutted and fbo. **** the vid you posted is faster than the hellcats even. But that's ok....you can believe that **** if you like.
Kinda like someone trapping 130mph in a 3300lbs car with only 417RWP.
Old 10-09-2022, 04:41 PM
  #8451  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

No it's not like that at all. What i did was well documented and backed up. Then we did another car and went faster just as it should have.

But since you say you have a 392 car......go back up his times with his mods.
Old 10-09-2022, 05:04 PM
  #8452  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
No it's not like that at all. What i did was well documented and backed up. Then we did another car and went faster just as it should have.

But since you say you have a 392 car......go back up his times with his mods.
He has the exact same amount of proof that you do, a video, and you didn't back up jack ****. Why would I bother weight reducing my car just to prove something that you wouldn't believe any way?
Old 10-10-2022, 01:17 PM
  #8453  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
He has the exact same amount of proof that you do, a video, and you didn't back up jack ****. Why would I bother weight reducing my car just to prove something that you wouldn't believe any way?
i did back it up. Car trapped somewhere around 130 about 20 times....maybe more. With a best of 131.3. It likely had 133 or so in it there at the end.

But you on the other hand haven't did ****. You make stupid vids about stupid ****. You look like a real moron....so yea you're right. You probably shouldn't reduce yourself any farther than that.🤣🤣🤣

Besides.....you said cai only for 11.2. Go gitt'r done! I mean **** if 1 can do it cai only yours should be able to right?? Cause the vette with did with the same combo on my car only went faster......ddoohhh. So there's 2 for me 0 for you.

Cai only your junk won't run with nathans old lbo ls1 and a hurt t56.
Old 10-10-2022, 01:28 PM
  #8454  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
i did back it up. Car trapped somewhere around 130 about 20 times....maybe more. With a best of 131.3. It likely had 133 or so in it there at the end.

But you on the other hand haven't did ****. You make stupid vids about stupid ****. You look like a real moron....so yea you're right. You probably shouldn't reduce yourself any farther than that.🤣🤣🤣

Besides.....you said cai only for 11.2. Go gitt'r done! I mean **** if 1 can do it cai only yours should be able to right?? Cause the vette with did with the same combo on my car only went faster......ddoohhh. So there's 2 for me 0 for you.

Cai only your junk won't run with nathans old lbo ls1 and a hurt t56.
Cool, where are those videos? I love that I've been absent here for years and my videos still live rent free in your mind. I also love that you still don't read, it's right in the title of the video and right on my post, a 4Klbs with driver challenger, that's about 500lbs of weight reduction.
Old 10-10-2022, 07:00 PM
  #8455  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Dude i don't even think about your dumbass. If you didn't say such stupid **** i wouldn't even acknowledge your existence....the world would be better off if people like you didn't exist.

My vids/pics have been posted for a long time dumbass.

Just as i thought....all mouth and you ain't gonna go do it.
Old 10-11-2022, 05:00 PM
  #8456  
TECH Enthusiast
 
AnnivSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 588
Received 212 Likes on 174 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Dude i don't even think about your dumbass. If you didn't say such stupid **** i wouldn't even acknowledge your existence....the world would be better off if people like you didn't exist.

My vids/pics have been posted for a long time dumbass.

Just as i thought....all mouth and you ain't gonna go do it.

I havent read every post of this thread, or you ever posted in general. But ive never seen a vid of your car posted.
The following 2 users liked this post by AnnivSS:
islander033 (10-12-2022), JC316 (10-12-2022)
Old 10-12-2022, 06:14 PM
  #8457  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Joined the EV crew. Been waiting two ******* years.



Last edited by sw07gt; 10-12-2022 at 06:37 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by sw07gt:
AnnivSS (10-13-2022), islander033 (10-13-2022), JC316 (10-12-2022)
Old 10-12-2022, 06:20 PM
  #8458  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AnnivSS
I havent read every post of this thread, or you ever posted in general. But ive never seen a vid of your car posted.
there's vids , et's, slips and info all over ls1tech of my car. You've simply chosen not to see it.
Old 10-12-2022, 07:46 PM
  #8459  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 372
Received 81 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sw07gt
Joined the EV crew. Been waiting two ******* years.
How are you liking it so far? I can't bring myself to buy electric yet, but maybe down the line.
Old 10-12-2022, 09:37 PM
  #8460  
Banned
 
HeatSeeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: US of A
Posts: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sw07gt
Joined the EV crew. Been waiting two ******* years.

So you're a libtard?


Quick Reply: Epic SRK B/S thread of 2019



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.