Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Stock LS1 kills on 4.6L 99+ mustangs!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2006, 09:21 PM
  #101  
JDP
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
 
JDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Allen Park, MI
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ya, but the mustang is the civic of domestics and ls1 cars will never top the aftermarket of mustangs, so they aint to much of an underdog if you ask me
JDP is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 11:47 PM
  #102  
Staging Lane
 
Angus66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stanger88
(on a 4.6L the motor must actually be removed at least in part to put LT's on, what a bitch!)
Who told you that you that to install long-tube headers on (any) 4.6 the engine "has to be removed at least in part" ????

That's simply not true...

The engine only needs to be lifted on one side with the motor mount unbolted for better access to some of the fasteners - I wouldn't exactly call that removing the engine.
Angus66 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 12:49 AM
  #103  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Angus66
Who told you that you that to install long-tube headers on (any) 4.6 the engine "has to be removed at least in part" ????

That's simply not true...

The engine only needs to be lifted on one side with the motor mount unbolted for better access to some of the fasteners - I wouldn't exactly call that removing the engine.
Motor mount un-bolted and motor jacked up...thats close enough to scare me!
BLKWS.6 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 03:56 AM
  #104  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,650
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stanger88
Motor mount un-bolted and motor jacked up...thats close enough to scare me!
eh?

If that's scary then you ought not to be fitting LT's in the first place.
300bhp/ton is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 06:58 AM
  #105  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
_JB_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,732
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by Stanger88
Motor mount un-bolted and motor jacked up...thats close enough to scare me!
Thats what I had to do to fit my BBK lt headers on my 88gt. I"m sure you had to do the same for your car if you put lts on.
_JB_ is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 08:26 PM
  #106  
Teching In
 
lxh89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pearland, Tx
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My only commentary is to say I would own a camaro if they looked and drove like the late 60s models. I absolutely despise the look and driving position of the late model f-bodies. I feel like I am sitting in a bath tub cruising.

Other thing to add, the late model f-bodies are the biggest pain in the butt to work on. I have helped a friend change plugs on an LT1 and it was ridiculous.

For pure horsepower in stock form, LS2 vette/gto/03-04 cobra hands down (this is throwing price/looks/etc out the window). For cheap horsepower, 98 camaro with the LS1. For ultimate looks, good performance, good driving position, the mach 1 (yeah I am biased, sue me).

Ultimate American driving machine, LS7 based Corvette Z06. All the foreign crap and even the Ford GT/Dodge Viper can eat their hearts out. The LS7 is all other production engine's daddy in the world.

Tony
lxh89 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 08:31 PM
  #107  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lxh89
My only commentary is to say I would own a camaro if they looked and drove like the late 60s models. I absolutely despise the look and driving position of the late model f-bodies. I feel like I am sitting in a bath tub cruising.

Other thing to add, the late model f-bodies are the biggest pain in the butt to work on. I have helped a friend change plugs on an LT1 and it was ridiculous.

For pure horsepower in stock form, LS2 vette/gto/03-04 cobra hands down (this is throwing price/looks/etc out the window). For cheap horsepower, 98 camaro with the LS1. For ultimate looks, good performance, good driving position, the mach 1 (yeah I am biased, sue me).

Ultimate American driving machine, LS7 based Corvette Z06. All the foreign crap and even the Ford GT/Dodge Viper can eat their hearts out. The LS7 is all other production engine's daddy in the world.

Tony
Hrmmm, seems like a difference of opinion on the seating. I felt like I was back in my World History lecture class's wooden park-bench esque seats when I rode in my friend's 03 GT. I much preferred my 95 TA. Opinion there though.
BLKWS.6 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:23 PM
  #108  
Teching In
 
kevinb1998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I currently own a 1999 SLP SS Camaro. Mods are HELLION, LT's, Underdrive pulley, Y-Pipe, no cats, FAST 90/90, upgraded springs and pushrods, SLP lip, SLP loudmouth. This car dyno'd at 409rwhp. There isnt a 4.6 mustang out here that has been able to touch it, even a cobra or a stock GT with an aftermarket S/C. Before this car, I had a 1998 Z-28 M6. Just a flowmaster, lid, and shifter. EVERY SINGLE 4.6 mustang was in the mirrors before the end of first gear. Even one with headers and 3.73's, lid and TB upgrade could not touch it. I even beat 5.0 car with an S/C on it. Bottom line: Mustangs suck. It will take alot for a 4.6 car to beat and LS1. It just doesnt matter. Rolling start, stand still, whatever. I have even allowed them 2 cars before I go. It doesnt make a difference. They are behind u by the time u the top of second even if they are given a 2 car lead. BY THE LS1!!!
kevinb1998 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:26 PM
  #109  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevinb1998
I currently own a 1999 SLP SS Camaro. Mods are HELLION, LT's, Underdrive pulley, Y-Pipe, no cats, FAST 90/90, upgraded springs and pushrods, SLP lip, SLP loudmouth. This car dyno'd at 409rwhp. There isnt a 4.6 mustang out here that has been able to touch it, even a cobra or a stock GT with an aftermarket S/C. Before this car, I had a 1998 Z-28 M6. Just a flowmaster, lid, and shifter. EVERY SINGLE 4.6 mustang was in the mirrors before the end of first gear. Even one with headers and 3.73's, lid and TB upgrade could not touch it. I even beat 5.0 car with an S/C on it. Bottom line: Mustangs suck. It will take alot for a 4.6 car to beat and LS1. It just doesnt matter. Rolling start, stand still, whatever. I have even allowed them 2 cars before I go. It doesnt make a difference. They are behind u by the time u the top of second even if they are given a 2 car lead. BY THE LS1!!!

Ignorance is bliss...ain't it.

What are you telling us about the 3 mustang races you had, and basing your 'opinion' on that?

Must be great to beat STOCK cobra's with 410 RWHP......
ponygt65 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:37 PM
  #110  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Mystic 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Antioch, Ca
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default I may be beating a dead horse...

wow, sorry for the pun. But like I said, this might be another insight:

Back in 2002, my Friends mother went out hell-bent on buying a brand new Mustang GT.. She test drove it, and HATED how it drove, she said it didnt feel like a performance car... She then drove her daughters (my friend) 98 Z28... and went out the next weekend and bought an 02 Z28... She has had NO problems with the car in the 4 years she's owned it, and it is still her DD. She went to test-drive a NEW mustang GT (2006)... and still likes her Z better.

Keep in mind this is a woman, in her 40's... and still prefers the interior of the F-bod to the new mustang. She might be an exception, but its what she says!

-Hope this helps
Mystic 98 TA is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:58 PM
  #111  
Staging Lane
 
Angus66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by kevinb1998
I currently own a 1999 SLP SS Camaro. Mods are HELLION, LT's, Underdrive pulley, Y-Pipe, no cats, FAST 90/90, upgraded springs and pushrods, SLP lip, SLP loudmouth. This car dyno'd at 409rwhp. There isnt a 4.6 mustang out here that has been able to touch it, even a cobra or a stock GT with an aftermarket S/C. Before this car, I had a 1998 Z-28 M6. Just a flowmaster, lid, and shifter. EVERY SINGLE 4.6 mustang was in the mirrors before the end of first gear. Even one with headers and 3.73's, lid and TB upgrade could not touch it. I even beat 5.0 car with an S/C on it. Bottom line: Mustangs suck. It will take alot for a 4.6 car to beat and LS1. It just doesnt matter. Rolling start, stand still, whatever. I have even allowed them 2 cars before I go. It doesnt make a difference. They are behind u by the time u the top of second even if they are given a 2 car lead. BY THE LS1!!!


If you've never been beaten by a 4.6 & you're LS1 only has 409 rwhp,
you must not get out much...
Angus66 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 11:30 PM
  #112  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Angus66


If you've never been beaten by a 4.6 & you're LS1 only has 409 rwhp,
you must not get out much...
ponygt65 is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 12:00 AM
  #113  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
00firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stanger88
Although the Chevy and Pontiac give you 305 HP with their base V8, the acceleration diffeence is actually pretty small, especially in a rolling start.
ok this is where it all went wrong. ls1 fbodys are rated 305 by the company to make the corvette look king. they actually make 305hp TO THE WHEELS stock. the acceleration is not the same, i can keep up with GTs in my v6 firebird too easily. the fbody is also at least a full second quicker in the 1/4 than the gt mustangs.
00firebird is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 12:39 AM
  #114  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
chadtx01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sweeny Texas
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Angus66


If you've never been beaten by a 4.6 & you're LS1 only has 409 rwhp,
you must not get out much...
x2...

I got a buddy with a 2v and he only dyno'd at 401, you should see if you can keep up with that car.
chadtx01 is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 01:55 AM
  #115  
On The Tree
 
AcE XBOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Salinas, Ca
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevinb1998
I currently own a 1999 SLP SS Camaro. Mods are HELLION, LT's, Underdrive pulley, Y-Pipe, no cats, FAST 90/90, upgraded springs and pushrods, SLP lip, SLP loudmouth. This car dyno'd at 409rwhp. There isnt a 4.6 mustang out here that has been able to touch it, even a cobra or a stock GT with an aftermarket S/C. Before this car, I had a 1998 Z-28 M6. Just a flowmaster, lid, and shifter. EVERY SINGLE 4.6 mustang was in the mirrors before the end of first gear. Even one with headers and 3.73's, lid and TB upgrade could not touch it. I even beat 5.0 car with an S/C on it. Bottom line: Mustangs suck. It will take alot for a 4.6 car to beat and LS1. It just doesnt matter. Rolling start, stand still, whatever. I have even allowed them 2 cars before I go. It doesnt make a difference. They are behind u by the time u the top of second even if they are given a 2 car lead. BY THE LS1!!!
lol I know of a few that will rape your ***.
AcE XBOX is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 09:37 AM
  #116  
Teching In
 
FunkyBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevinb1998
Mods are HELLION, LT's, Underdrive pulley, Y-Pipe, no cats, FAST 90/90, upgraded springs and pushrods, SLP lip, SLP loudmouth. This car dyno'd at 409rwhp.
What's HELLION??? Don't they make turbo kits?
FunkyBoss is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 09:46 AM
  #117  
TECH Apprentice
 
Iron Sights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think it is a cam, and one that someone with an LS2 GTO used to make over 500rwhp (with heads of course).
Iron Sights is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 09:54 AM
  #118  
Teching In
 
FunkyBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iron Sights
I think it is a cam, and one that someone with an LS2 GTO used to make over 500rwhp (with heads of course).
Thanks! I'm new to the LSX world !
FunkyBoss is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 11:20 AM
  #119  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hellion also is a company that makes turbos (big name in the mustang world)
BLKWS.6 is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 02:18 PM
  #120  
9 Second Club
 
04Terminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Coast
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kevinb1998
I currently own a 1999 SLP SS Camaro. Mods are HELLION, LT's, Underdrive pulley, Y-Pipe, no cats, FAST 90/90, upgraded springs and pushrods, SLP lip, SLP loudmouth. This car dyno'd at 409rwhp. There isnt a 4.6 mustang out here that has been able to touch it, even a cobra or a stock GT with an aftermarket S/C. Before this car, I had a 1998 Z-28 M6. Just a flowmaster, lid, and shifter. EVERY SINGLE 4.6 mustang was in the mirrors before the end of first gear. Even one with headers and 3.73's, lid and TB upgrade could not touch it. I even beat 5.0 car with an S/C on it. Bottom line: Mustangs suck. It will take alot for a 4.6 car to beat and LS1. It just doesnt matter. Rolling start, stand still, whatever. I have even allowed them 2 cars before I go. It doesnt make a difference. They are behind u by the time u the top of second even if they are given a 2 car lead. BY THE LS1!!!
Stick around, kevinb...you need an edumacation on mustangs and other potentailly fast cars. I'd hand a 409rwhp LS1 it's *** with 4 out of my 5 stangs and 450+rwhp Fbods are not real uncommon. Sounds like you've found some mustang owners who are either stock or not racing. Show a little respect, man.
04Terminator is offline  


Quick Reply: Stock LS1 kills on 4.6L 99+ mustangs!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.