Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Beat a 99ish Cobra in my LT1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2008, 08:57 PM
  #61  
Teching In
 
brian06eleanor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: north georgia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedshifterNC
I was poking fun...and for the last time I have an ls1 not an lt1...its an lt1 car....read between the lines. Believe it or not I wouldn't mind having a 4.6...for a daily driver. My only arguement is that by the time you spend enough to build a 4.6 to run with an modern fbody with a good driver, he could put a 100 shot on his car and watch you fade in the mirror
haha now i get the sleeper part lol
brian06eleanor is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:02 PM
  #62  
Teching In
 
brian06eleanor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: north georgia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redneckbmxer24
who would leave their bottom end stock if they wanted to push 500+RWHP. there are quite a few stock bottom end 99/01's making over 400RWHP with a heads/cams package, and ported intake.

to do 500RWHP on a 3V, yoru going to have to add boost, and a more realistic HP number for a safe stock bottom end is about 425-450. 500RWHP on a stock bottom end in a 3V is a ticking time bomb, ive seen several of them pop, i work at a mustang shop, and have had several of them blow.

and ever think maybe he isnt a very good driver. and when you say "around 320RWHP" did you dyno it, or are you guessing.

i know hes a good driver we took his car to a 1/8 track and he made 2 passes in it and i made 2. and they were within .2 of each other all 4 runs. but yes i had it dynoed, it made 318rwhp and 330rwtq b4 i changed the gears, with just the couple bolt-ons i had at the time.

and as for the realistic safe hp, if your having all these motors pop then its the tuners fought, i truely believe my tuner is the best modular motor tuner in the country,Tim Barth at modularpowerhouse, but he has tuned prob 30+3v stangs that i know of makin 480+rwhp. many over 500 mine being one of them. and as far as i know he has never had a motor pop due to his tuning. i would not consider mine a time bmb either its a dd, ive had the tubo on 6 months prob and put over 10,000 miles on it thus far without one issue.
brian06eleanor is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:04 PM
  #63  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
95N20FORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redneckbmxer24
if it was a navy blue, it was a 01. 99's were red, white, black, and green.

and from the way it ran with you, it was a cobra, a GT would have been nowhere near that close.

a few 2V GT's stock have run 13.9s with excellent drivers, and better tires. with stock tires and a good driver they're typicall low - mid 14 cars. general comparison a 99/01 cobra, or 03/04 mach would be closer to stock LS1 car, or a slightly modded LT1. a 99-04GT needs full bolt ons to even hang with a stock LS1.

and 95N20FORMULA, you should watch what you say comparing "mustangs" to LT1's, because i have news for you, a 03/04 cobra, or a GT500 will **** your **** all up.


3 things
1.i was talkin about 2v stangs AS this thread had moved towards 2vs vs lt1s
2. im bolt ons and 125 shot and id roast a stock gt500 or termy...
3. mod for mod an lt1 is a drivers race with most mustangs except termys and maybe, just maybe a mach
95N20FORMULA is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:44 PM
  #64  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
speedshifterNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 575
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was talking about NA motors as well, but of course you cant throw the termis at me b/c I know they're fast as evident in my previous post. Redneckbmxer24 is prolly one on the smarter ford guys as he atleast starts with a 5.4. Man you ford guys get riled easy. Also as I said before in other threads I think the 3v motors are impressive. The problem with the modern mustang of course is weight. Put those motors in a foxbody then I might get excited.
speedshifterNC is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:55 PM
  #65  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
I8ASaleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N. Richland Hills
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Uninformed Mustang owners pwn this thread.
I8ASaleen is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 10:15 PM
  #66  
Launching!
 
99RebelZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I find it humerous that the 15 year old LT1 is still competitive with current mustang gts... and before I get bashed for saying that, yes I know the terminator and GT500 are very fast and have tons of potential. I drove my uncle's GT500 when he first got it and I was very impressed, it didn't feel like a "heavy" car at all and pulls very nicely; it also gave me the mod itch to start doing motor work to my car...(hopefully early this summer).
99RebelZ28 is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 10:16 PM
  #67  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99RebelZ28
I find it humerous that the 15 year old LT1 is still competitive with current mustang gts...
Why? The LT1 was a badass motor!!!
Stopsign32v is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 10:18 PM
  #68  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
I8ASaleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N. Richland Hills
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yea but nobody likes it now Can't even get near the aftermarket support as Mustangs or even LS1's...
I8ASaleen is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 10:41 PM
  #69  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedshifterNC
I was talking about NA motors as well, but of course you cant throw the termis at me b/c I know they're fast as evident in my previous post. Redneckbmxer24 is prolly one on the smarter ford guys as he atleast starts with a 5.4. Man you ford guys get riled easy. Also as I said before in other threads I think the 3v motors are impressive. The problem with the modern mustang of course is weight. Put those motors in a foxbody then I might get excited.
3531lb race weight with my fat *** and a blower is heavy?
Sarge_13 is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 10:48 PM
  #70  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah, the average S-197 is "only" about 50-100lbs heavier than a New Edge car... which puts them right around/slightly over what the average V8 F-body weighs.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 10:53 PM
  #71  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Yeah, the average S-197 is "only" about 50-100lbs heavier than a New Edge car... which puts them right around/slightly over what the average V8 F-body weighs.
Are you saying my car weighs a lot? I'm actually kinda curious what other cars with my type of setup weigh around.
Sarge_13 is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 11:36 PM
  #72  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well unless otherwise stated, it's generally understood that we're talking about the V8 models . But your car weighs ~50-100lbs more than a similarly-equipped 99-04 V6.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 11:48 PM
  #73  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
95hitam6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well, i respect mustangs all my buddies home have one, but i have yet to race a gt, and the ones i have come across won't race me, and alot of gt owners i have met here are idiots, my co-worker has a 99 gt, kn, catback, auto, tune? and thinks he has 300rwhp. yesterday he said my lt1 was "a pu55y *** engine", i told him i'll smoke em anyday he wants. know what he told me, " i'll never race you cuz you have a 5spd" these are the mustang guys i run into now. sad.
95hitam6 is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 07:51 AM
  #74  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Well unless otherwise stated, it's generally understood that we're talking about the V8 models . But your car weighs ~50-100lbs more than a similarly-equipped 99-04 V6.
Sarge_13 is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 08:06 AM
  #75  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
95N20FORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my car doesnt way but 3375 w/o me...i dont think thats too heavy...95 Firebird Formula btw...
95N20FORMULA is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 08:14 AM
  #76  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Back on topic. Good kill. -Mark
Bitemark46 is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 12:49 PM
  #77  
TECH Apprentice
 
TXFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im just tired of all the ford guys acting like a SUPERCHARGER doesnt INCREASE power DRASTICALLY. the 03/04 cobras wouldnt be king kong without their blowers. you all act like its not a valid argument. when thats the ONLY thing that gives them so much "potential" as you guys like to say. a SUPERCHARGER gives any v8 more "potential" including an lt1
TXFORMULA is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 12:56 PM
  #78  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXFORMULA
im just tired of all the ford guys acting like a SUPERCHARGER doesnt INCREASE power DRASTICALLY. the 03/04 cobras wouldnt be king kong without their blowers. you all act like its not a valid argument. when thats the ONLY thing that gives them so much "potential" as you guys like to say. a SUPERCHARGER gives any v8 more "potential" including an lt1
please leave the internet immediately before your retardation spreads any further
88blackgt is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 01:15 PM
  #79  
TECH Apprentice
 
TXFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 88blackgt
please leave the internet immediately before your retardation spreads any further
thanks for the reply 1988. i had a $50 bet(with a mustang owner) that someone would quote my post as if a blower doesnt make a diff. thanks again. funniest part is, he said " nooo, no one is that stupid". -and no, im not calling you stupid
TXFORMULA is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 01:22 PM
  #80  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TXFORMULA
im just tired of all the ford guys acting like a SUPERCHARGER doesnt INCREASE power DRASTICALLY. the 03/04 cobras wouldnt be king kong without their blowers. you all act like its not a valid argument. when thats the ONLY thing that gives them so much "potential" as you guys like to say. a SUPERCHARGER gives any v8 more "potential" including an lt1
I'm sure Ford could have gone the n/a route with the '03-'04 Cobras and the GT500 if they really wanted to... it's not like an n/a DOHC 4.6 or 5.4 is that hard to hit 350hp at the crank with. But for a variety of reasons they chose to go forced induction. Just like the new ZR1. GM could have just done a h/c/i setup on a regular LS7 and gotten quite a bit more power, but they chose to go forced induction.
Irunelevens is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.