Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Better mod for the money: Shocks or Poly Bushings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2011, 02:20 AM
  #21  
HWI
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
HWI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Average Joe
Do you happen to carry a good set of shocks and struts Sir? I hear your the man with the properly set-up suspension plan.
Your car doesn't have struts, just fyi. Strano sells some good ****, but I don't think he sells drag shocks. Are you willing to sacrifice handling to reduce your e.t.? Drag shocks handle like ***.
Old 06-08-2011, 07:03 AM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HWI
Your car doesn't have struts, just fyi.
A strut bears load. A shock does not.
while its not a McPhereson strut suspension, the front suspension dampener of 4th generation fbodies is still a strut.
Old 06-08-2011, 08:26 AM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrDude_1
A strut bears load. A shock does not.
while its not a McPhereson strut suspension, the front suspension dampener of 4th generation fbodies is still a strut.
No it isn't. Please don't try to "school" us with your expertise.
Old 06-08-2011, 08:28 AM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Read this if you're so inclined.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/suspensio...ve-struts.html
Old 06-08-2011, 08:32 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
lees02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 210 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

or this from here https://ls1tech.com/forums/suspensio...l#post14872361

Originally Posted by lees02WS6
This is being a nitpick, and maybe this adds nothing, but there should be a sticky called "they're shocks, not struts" explaining the difference between macpherson strut (SN197)/modified macpherson strut (SN95 Mustang/third gen f-body) suspensions, and an SLA front suspension (4th gen f-body, corvette, viper etc...)

Originally Posted by lees02WS6 View Post
99Forumula is correct. They are not struts. One of big pet peeves around here is calling the SLA setup on the 4th gen, with its shock and coil, a strut . The third gen f-body came with modified Macpherson Struts, in which the coil was mounted to the lower a-arm, just as with the pre-05 mustang. The thirdgen had a strut, as evidenced by the lack of an upper control arm, and the shock having the strut body to support, and locate the knuckle (spindle).

The fourth gen has a short long arm setup (the SLA in SLA), with an upper control arm, and a spindle, the shock mounts to the lower control arm, and does not locate the spindle.

Long and short, the 4th gens have shocks, not struts.


Explaining how the rear suspension works wouldn't be a bad thing either.



https://ls1tech.com/forums/suspensio...l#post14268260
Originally Posted by lees02WS6
The distinguishing feature on a strut suspension isn't that the shock body bears weight (it may or may not), it's that it performs a function that provides for, locates, and controls the motion of the wheel. The third gen, and SN95 musting, do NOT have the spring on the strut body, it has the spring on the lower control arm, hence the modified part of modified macpherson struts, from the factory.

To restate your points the 4th gen front shocks have more in common with a coilover then a strut. That the shock body bears load is irrelevant, it doesn't locate the wheel, the 4th gen shock only provides dampening and that's it.

To pick a car from another ball park that shares similarities to the F-body front suspension, the Lexus ls400 also has a tall spindle and an upper control arm, and a shock body that supports the spring (looks very similar to the 4th gen f-body). They aren't struts either.
Old 06-08-2011, 08:45 AM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

^^^in thread ownage
Old 06-08-2011, 09:52 AM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

nitpicking.
if nothing else, i'll continue to call it a strut to annoy you. :p
Old 06-08-2011, 10:03 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
lees02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 210 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrDude_1
nitpicking.
if nothing else, i'll continue to call it a strut to annoy you. :p
Well that's ok. I can't stamp out the "rubber bad, poly good" mentality that is pervasive here either.
Old 06-08-2011, 06:24 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Average Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lees02WS6
Well that's ok. I can't stamp out the "rubber bad, poly good" mentality that is pervasive here either.
Why wouldn't it be? It will last longer in the elements, far longer than my shitty rubber motor mounts and bushings.

What would be detrimental about them anyways?
Old 06-08-2011, 09:31 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
lees02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 210 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Average Joe
Why wouldn't it be? It will last longer in the elements, far longer than my shitty rubber motor mounts and bushings.

What would be detrimental about them anyways?
Poly binds up suspension, and permanently deforms after some time. The more use it's exposed to, and the lower the durometer of the bushing, the more quickly it will occur.
Old 06-09-2011, 10:39 AM
  #31  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,591
Received 142 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrDude_1
A strut bears load. A shock does not.
while its not a McPhereson strut suspension, the front suspension dampener of 4th generation fbodies is still a strut.
Ahhhh, what?

It's not strut, a strut locates the knuckle. Just because the spring is over the damper (not dampener, we're not making something wet) doesn't make a strut. In fact 3rd gens and 79-04 Mustangs have struts and the spring is not located on the damper at all, but off to the side.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
Old 06-09-2011, 05:54 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Latch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The stock shocks are pitiful, even some cheap Bilsteins will be a huge improvement in ride and handling. With Bilsteins my car no longer drives like an old 80s Buick and more like a sports car.
Old 06-09-2011, 10:46 PM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Average Joe
Why wouldn't it be? It will last longer in the elements, far longer than my shitty rubber motor mounts and bushings.

What would be detrimental about them anyways?
It also vibrates the **** out of your car making it feel like a rattle trap. I only have poly in spots that I feel like I need for hard drag launches. And I don't like that little bit for street driving.
Old 06-09-2011, 11:31 PM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SVThuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would never upgrade anything in the suspension without having good shocks as my foundation.

And FWIW, unless your drag racing only, poly is a horrible bushing material due to the fact that it will bind and eventually chunk and fail in an articulating location such as a caster bushing or similar. I have poly in exactly 3 locations.. 1 end of my panhard bar, and my swaybar mounts and endlinks. Those are the only places that my car will ever see poly in the suspension.



Quick Reply: Better mod for the money: Shocks or Poly Bushings?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM.