subframe connectors
#42
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
#44
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
This. And anyone who tries to prove otherwise, great shocks or not, jack your car up and watch the doors, hood, hatch, and t-tops not shut. That's proof enough these cars can benefit from connectors. Period. Just installed a set of MCs and strut tower bar on a 94 vert and the owner said it was like a whole different car. And, anyone who says these chassis don't flex like the wind is just showing your inexperience in working on them.
#45
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ But the Strut bar has arguable "gains" besides being a place to rest rags or your hands while working under the hood.
Plus $250 for Strano springs..
$1609....
May we add some LCA's to that tab, Mr Bond?
$1609....
May we add some LCA's to that tab, Mr Bond?
#46
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
Square tube connectors are a dream for people who use floor jacks and jack stands regularly. And, even with connectors the bodies still flex some. It's crazy how flimsy these cars are.
#47
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ yeah exactly! Can jack the car up by the LCA mounting point and the front end comes up (with SFC's)... It's pretty funny the first couple times you see it.
My buddy has the SLP Three points and it's humorous to just stick the jack under there and play pit crew... "CLEAR!! ..... Slam...."
My buddy has the SLP Three points and it's humorous to just stick the jack under there and play pit crew... "CLEAR!! ..... Slam...."
Last edited by bayer-z28; 12-18-2012 at 07:45 PM.
#48
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
I'm used to the flex of the car, so when I first got my Trailblazer (full framed truck) and jacked it up the whole side lifted and I was like WTH lol
Now i jack up the Camaro and go WTH why does it flex so much!
MWC SFCs are on the 2013 "to-do" list. Along with a bajillion other items (like good shocks). My wallet is already screaming bloody murder at me
Now i jack up the Camaro and go WTH why does it flex so much!
MWC SFCs are on the 2013 "to-do" list. Along with a bajillion other items (like good shocks). My wallet is already screaming bloody murder at me
#50
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If anyone autocrosses it would be nice if they were to chime in here. Most of the discussion has pertained to drag racing. Every test drive/review of a car I have ever read mentions the cars structural rigidity in how the car handles - they don't like body flex when you are taking a hard turn. Above someone mentioned subframe connectors being dead weight with an autocross car. I'd have to disagree. I believe improved structural rigidity would be a good thing in either case.
#52
I have 2pt UMI tubular bolt ins, I got them cause I noticed my car started getting torque dimples on the quarter panels, nothing too too big but I didnt want it getting worse since the car got painted less than a year ago. I did notice my car felt a little stiffer and my rod ended lca's dont make as much noise.
#53
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The guys that run in NASA's CMC use SFC's for two reasons to make weight for there class and add structural rigididty. Why just add weight bars when you can do it with SFC's. They are mounted low and close to the CG of the car.
#58
TECH Senior Member
If anyone autocrosses it would be nice if they were to chime in here. Most of the discussion has pertained to drag racing. Every test drive/review of a car I have ever read mentions the cars structural rigidity in how the car handles - they don't like body flex when you are taking a hard turn. Above someone mentioned subframe connectors being dead weight with an autocross car. I'd have to disagree. I believe improved structural rigidity would be a good thing in either case.
Auto-xers/road racers:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/6709425-post5.html
*Note Sam's Camaro has multiple national SCCA chamionships on it with no chassis stiffening, although the class now allows it...
https://ls1tech.com/forums/6712303-post13.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/6711313-post11.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/6717153-post24.html
This. And anyone who tries to prove otherwise, great shocks or not, jack your car up and watch the doors, hood, hatch, and t-tops not shut. That's proof enough these cars can benefit from connectors. Period. Just installed a set of MCs and strut tower bar on a 94 vert and the owner said it was like a whole different car. And, anyone who says these chassis don't flex like the wind is just showing your inexperience in working on them.
Ive had my car (with no SFC's at the time) teetering between two wheels with the jack on one corner of the car and all the doors opened/closed fine, T-tops came off/on fine and hood/hatch opened/closed fine. These cars flex no where NEAR that. Its pretty much been proven that a STB does nothing as well...
#60
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
You can't be serious....
Ive had my car (with no SFC's at the time) teetering between two wheels with the jack on one corner of the car and all the doors opened/closed fine, T-tops came off/on fine and hood/hatch opened/closed fine. These cars flex no where NEAR that. Its pretty much been proven that a STB does nothing as well...