ls9 clutch confusion
#1
ls9 clutch confusion
So I had the ls9 clutch installed a while ago and had some engagement issues where it was very difficult to get into gear when running. Reverse was by far the worst . J have put almost 1200 miles on the new setup. I have put in a new slave, master, tranny mount, new atf fluid (syncromesh), bled many times with a power bleeder. So I came to the conclusion it must need to be shimmed. Well I pulled out the tranny.measured the distance from the transmission surface to the top of the fully compressed slave with the throwout bearing. The measurement was. 1.58in. I then measured from the bellhousing surface to the pressure plate fingers. The measurement was. 1.68 in. So normally they recommend .175-.225 of spacing. So I'm at a loss for the issue as it obviously doesn't need the slave to be shimmed. Help please!
#5
To be honest I don't remember exactly, I drove from AZ to FL the day after I did it. I just remember it being smoother after a while.....then my slave cracked a week later. New slave and smooth as butter.
#7
Tick says the gap should be between 1/16" and 1/8". It sounds like you're fine in terms of separation, as you said.
I'm beginning to wonder if this is a symptom of the CS transmission mount you added. Before the install, your OEM motor and transmission mounts were sagging by roughly the same amount. By refreshing the tranny mount and leaving the motor mounts the same, you probably threw everything out of alignment.
Try parking the car on a steep incline and decline and trying to shift into reverse. Good mounts should support the engine under these conditions. Bad mounts should allow the weight of the motor to shift slightly, either exacerbating or improving the situation. Just a theory right now.
I'm beginning to wonder if this is a symptom of the CS transmission mount you added. Before the install, your OEM motor and transmission mounts were sagging by roughly the same amount. By refreshing the tranny mount and leaving the motor mounts the same, you probably threw everything out of alignment.
Try parking the car on a steep incline and decline and trying to shift into reverse. Good mounts should support the engine under these conditions. Bad mounts should allow the weight of the motor to shift slightly, either exacerbating or improving the situation. Just a theory right now.
Trending Topics
#8
Tick says the gap should be between 1/16" and 1/8". It sounds like you're fine in terms of separation, as you said.
I'm beginning to wonder if this is a symptom of the CS transmission mount you added. Before the install, your OEM motor and transmission mounts were sagging by roughly the same amount. By refreshing the tranny mount and leaving the motor mounts the same, you probably threw everything out of alignment.
Try parking the car on a steep incline and decline and trying to shift into reverse. Good mounts should support the engine under these conditions. Bad mounts should allow the weight of the motor to shift slightly, either exacerbating or improving the situation. Just a theory right now.
I'm beginning to wonder if this is a symptom of the CS transmission mount you added. Before the install, your OEM motor and transmission mounts were sagging by roughly the same amount. By refreshing the tranny mount and leaving the motor mounts the same, you probably threw everything out of alignment.
Try parking the car on a steep incline and decline and trying to shift into reverse. Good mounts should support the engine under these conditions. Bad mounts should allow the weight of the motor to shift slightly, either exacerbating or improving the situation. Just a theory right now.
I have brand new UMI motors mounts that went in before the clutch. The transmission mount did not get installed until several hundred miles after the clutch as well as i thought it might help the problem. When I pulled out the OEM transmission mount it looked brand new and in great condition. I'm really at a loss unless it is something mechanical in the clutch mechanism that perhaps has too much slop.. BTW I confirmed the tick performance shims do in fact fit fine on our cars.
This is the LS9X kit from Katech
#11
How many miles on the trans? Hopefully the problem is in the linkage, not internal to the trans.
#12
I have brand new UMI motors mounts that went in before the clutch. The transmission mount did not get installed until several hundred miles after the clutch as well as i thought it might help the problem. When I pulled out the OEM transmission mount it looked brand new and in great condition. I'm really at a loss unless it is something mechanical in the clutch mechanism that perhaps has too much slop.. BTW I confirmed the tick performance shims do in fact fit fine on our cars.
#13
It does not make any difference. The transmission will shift into gear, it just requires significantly more force. When the car is in gear with the clutch pedal fully depressed and on a very level surface, the car will slowly roll forward.
#16
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you using the original/new cts-v slave or a new ls9 slave? 110k on the stock slave might be time for replacement if its not extending far enough to separate both discs from the flywheel.
#17
It sounds like you have exactly the same problem that I have (clutch not fully disengaging). I have the Tick shim kit and hope to install it this weekend, weather permitting. I'll try to remember to let you know what happens with it. I plan on getting as close to 1/8" spacing as possible.
#18
It sounds like you have exactly the same problem that I have (clutch not fully disengaging). I have the Tick shim kit and hope to install it this weekend, weather permitting. I'll try to remember to let you know what happens with it. I plan on getting as close to 1/8" spacing as possible.
Another possibility. I believe the disc directly behind the pressure plate is fixed in position, perhaps the one behind it is bent? Are we talking a very obvious bend? something i can visually see?