Carbureted LSX Forum Carburetors | Carbed Intakes | Carb Tuning Tips for LSX Enthusiasts

lq4 combo for track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2011, 11:04 AM
  #1  
11 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Breaux Bridge, LA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default lq4 combo for track

hey fellas,
I just bought a nice coupe that I'm building into a 1/4 mi bracket car (foot brake). I would like to hear your opinion or advice on this setup.

The powerplant will consist of a stock lq4 shortblock, 243's milled .040, port work done by a local hand porter, stock valves, and valve job. I calculated the CR to be 11.35 with a .040 thick gasket.

Induction: Victor Jr intake and a 850 4150 style carb.
Ignition: MSD-6010
Headers: 1 7/8" dynatech
Trans: th350 with an 8" converter 5000?
Rear: 4.10's with 26 or 28" tall tire

Now what I'm having trouble deciding on is a cam. I want to be able to run on pump (93oct) gas and I don't want to shift any higher than 7k. I was thinking somewhere with duration in the 240's and a lsa of 110.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Lance

Here are some details and pics of the car...

Stock style suspension coupe with aje k
member for SBC, BBC or LS

- aje k member and hustler a-arms
- strange front brakes
- strange struts with coil overs
- nice 8 point cage
- sub frame connectors
- strange adjustable rear shocks
- aerospace rear brakes
- bulletproof 8.8 moser spool
- moser axles narrowed 2 inches per side
- megabit control arms
- braided fuel line with Holley pump
- Holley regulator for NOS
- line lock all new wired, not plumbed
- Autometer guages mounted in dash pods
- Weld wheels 15x10 and 15x3.5
- Front tires are brand new
- Rear tires are Hoosier 26x8.5" - 3 passes
- nice full stock interior including backseat
- bolt / pin 4" hood
- electric fan
- on/off switch in rear
- driveshaft loop
- wheelie bar tabs on rear







Old 02-10-2011, 11:42 AM
  #2  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Give Pat G a PM, otherwise, that sounds like Trex territory, that is what i have and i run 7.2 with a 1.6 60 before getting kicked dues to no fire suit, i was going for a 7.1 with a 1.5 60. That is in a 89 camaro, should be 3100-3200 before my 300 pounds gets in, stock 317s milled .030.

So, with your combo, it would be a way faster setup with that cam. It is on a 110 LSA as well.

The company that makes the cam went 11.48 i think with a stock long block with that cam in a 4th gen.

242/248 @.050, .610/.615 lift on a 110, i shift at 7000.
Old 02-10-2011, 12:50 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
chad rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Too much compression for pump gas
Old 02-10-2011, 12:51 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
chad rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Unless you fuel inj
Old 02-10-2011, 01:43 PM
  #5  
11 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Breaux Bridge, LA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Zones,
I had figured something along the lines of a TRex from what I have gathered but I'm no cam expert by any means.

I just played with the DCR calculator using TRex specs on XER lobes, assuming it has a 106 ICL (+4 advance), I came up with 8.5. That being said It will allow the cam to bleed off more cylinder pressure enable to run pump gas. I know more than likely I'm going to have to flycut the pistons for a cam of this size.

Am I on the right track?

Lance
Old 02-10-2011, 07:50 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Always good to check ptv clearance with milled heads and thin gasket. And yes. I figure your dcr sounds bout right with ur scr. So cam still run on pump gas
Old 02-10-2011, 07:56 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

That's with the trex. I have used the cam many times and highly reccomend it. It will be very aggressive throughout the band and wot. And almost psycho with spray.
Most likely will need to cut in vr in pistons, especially with the .040 thick gaskets. Quench will be around .030. Usually lq4 are around .010 out the bore TDC. Excellent selection of parts.
Old 02-11-2011, 03:18 PM
  #8  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Yea, if it was MY engine, a Trex would be going in.


Originally Posted by chad rock
Too much compression for pump gas
11.5 is run very often in LS cars with EFI and carbs actually have a denser fuel charge so pump gas is easily done thing with 11 to 1.
Old 02-11-2011, 03:25 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Octane tolerance is not dictated by scr alone. Dcr and quench also play role in octane tolerance along with chamber design and other variables. To say it won't run on pump gas basing off scr alone is not always correct
Old 02-11-2011, 04:24 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
chad rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I been old school small block racing for years just started fooling with fuel inj 7 years ago. I know few guys doing 12 to 1 fuel inj .personaly never seen anyone have any luck with 11 to 1 with carb on 93 but that was with distribitor .timing curve with msd ls box could make it much easier to make a 93 Oct curve
Old 02-11-2011, 04:30 PM
  #11  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
six.o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: ms
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chad rock
I been old school small block racing for years just started fooling with fuel inj 7 years ago. I know few guys doing 12 to 1 fuel inj .personaly never seen anyone have any luck with 11 to 1 with carb on 93 but that was with distribitor .timing curve with msd ls box could make it much easier to make a 93 Oct curve
so i have no luck? By the way mine is 11.6 to1 it will run on pump gas but if i am spraying a big kit i use good fuel.

Last edited by six.o; 02-11-2011 at 04:36 PM.
Old 02-11-2011, 04:36 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
billyflantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DAVIDSON NC
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i ran pump gas in mine...
Old 02-11-2011, 05:13 PM
  #13  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Billy, i have had some dispute with a friend, what does your car weigh with and without you in it?


Originally Posted by chad rock
I been old school small block racing for years just started fooling with fuel inj 7 years ago. I know few guys doing 12 to 1 fuel inj .personaly never seen anyone have any luck with 11 to 1 with carb on 93 but that was with distribitor .timing curve with msd ls box could make it much easier to make a 93 Oct curve
Old school small blocks were not near as efficient as the LS engine, the pistons sat down in the bore on TDC, the LS is out of the bore, the chambers are way more efficient and if you tried 11 to 1 with a old small block and iron heads, chances are it can run fine, but like a dog because the timing would have to be pulled back. Now, with aluminum heads on the old SBC, 11 is possible as again, with a tune.
Old 02-11-2011, 08:31 PM
  #14  
11 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Breaux Bridge, LA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I appreciate the feed back y'all!

I've been following Billy's setup and it just flat out works. Hopefully mine can be just as good. What would be a good operating range for this setup? Since I want this engine to live, I guess it would be best for me to install some good rod bolts in it.

To flycut the pistons I guess I would take it to a machine shop since I don't have all the tools to degree the cam and check ptv.

Lastly, have y'all had any experience with EPS's single plane cam?
it's 236/248 @ .050 .615/.615 with 108 LSA

Thanks,
Lance
Old 02-11-2011, 08:35 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
billyflantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DAVIDSON NC
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Billy, i have had some dispute with a friend, what does your car weigh with and without you in it?




Old school small blocks were not near as efficient as the LS engine, the pistons sat down in the bore on TDC, the LS is out of the bore, the chambers are way more efficient and if you tried 11 to 1 with a old small block and iron heads, chances are it can run fine, but like a dog because the timing would have to be pulled back. Now, with aluminum heads on the old SBC, 11 is possible as again, with a tune.
2500lbs and 2700lbs
Old 02-12-2011, 12:28 AM
  #16  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bluecajun5.3
I appreciate the feed back y'all!

I've been following Billy's setup and it just flat out works. Hopefully mine can be just as good. What would be a good operating range for this setup? Since I want this engine to live, I guess it would be best for me to install some good rod bolts in it.

To flycut the pistons I guess I would take it to a machine shop since I don't have all the tools to degree the cam and check ptv.

Lastly, have y'all had any experience with EPS's single plane cam?
it's 236/248 @ .050 .615/.615 with 108 LSA

Thanks,
Lance
We are really waiting for someone to shine in on how well that off the shelf EPS grind will so, i bet DAMN well in our carbed setups, the guy at EPS does know his ****.

I am hitting 7200 with a stock long block, so ARP or kateck bolts would be good insurance.

Originally Posted by billyflantos
2500lbs and 2700lbs

Pretty light, no videos still?
Old 02-12-2011, 09:45 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
billyflantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DAVIDSON NC
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i had one when i made a nitrous pass(got accidently erased)...and i got one with the stock motor in it..
Old 02-12-2011, 11:34 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
chad rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OLd school cast iron heads didn't work back then .never used aluminium
Old 02-12-2011, 11:35 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
chad rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Things have changed over the years
Old 02-12-2011, 11:45 AM
  #20  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
rojs234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sparta, Mo. in southwest Missouri
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Billy, i have had some dispute with a friend, what does your car weigh with and without you in it?




Old school small blocks were not near as efficient as the LS engine, the pistons sat down in the bore on TDC, the LS is out of the bore, the chambers are way more efficient and if you tried 11 to 1 with a old small block and iron heads, chances are it can run fine, but like a dog because the timing would have to be pulled back. Now, with aluminum heads on the old SBC, 11 is possible as again, with a tune.
A little off topic, but the old Mopar Performance Engine Manuals used to claim that aluminum heads required 1 1/2- 2 ratio higer compression as an identical iron head to make the same horsepower because of heat loss through the aluminum.


Quick Reply: lq4 combo for track



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.