Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS1 Pinto project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2010, 08:23 AM
  #61  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
gofastwclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,950
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lsxpinto
Thanks, I'd like to see it run to. I'm having some good times working on it. My brother stole my throttle body and intake So I had him order the four barrel TB. Should work really well with the nitrous.
O, Here is my old intake and throttle body
http://vettesandperformance.com/imag...a/DSC05832.JPG
I think i saw your MIA throttle body!

Nice work. Will this be at KCIR this year?
Old 11-03-2011, 12:26 PM
  #62  
Teching In
 
IMACHU2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry to be the new guy bumping an old thread, but does anyone know if this dood is still a member here or know if he ever finished the car? I have a 1978 Ford Mustang (The Pinto's big brother). I have been considering doing a 5.3L Truck LS / 4L60 swap in my Mustang. The 300HP 302 H.O with a 100 shot of nitrous historically tends to last about 6 months. LOL The C4 3 speed auto tends to last about a year. I want an overdrive auto, and the Ford AOD is a piece of wood. So I was thinking a 5.3L is 325 HP ($500) + a comp cam and beehive spings = over 400 hp and a bolt on 4L60 (an overdrive transmission that is not a piece of sheot) would be a nice combo for the Pinto-Stang
Old 11-03-2011, 01:22 PM
  #63  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
RATBOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you're hurting a 302 with a little 100 shot inside 6 months, you're doing it wrong. I've sprayed many stock ones anywhere from 100-225 hp plate kits with no problems.
Old 11-03-2011, 03:17 PM
  #64  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Tramminc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 581
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 92camaroguy
A pinto.... I would kill for one.
Many people have, that's why they stopped making them. in a rearend crash they kept blowing up because of the gas tank location.
Old 11-03-2011, 03:23 PM
  #65  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Tramminc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 581
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bowtie70SS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dT0J0...atch-main-area

I always liked this scene from "Top Secret" don't take it the wrong way I'm not trying to hate.
That's the best laugh I had all day, THANKS
Old 11-03-2011, 03:32 PM
  #66  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Tramminc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 581
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

You may find this useful

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqtRkrmTY0Y&NR=1
Old 11-09-2011, 01:52 PM
  #67  
Teching In
 
IMACHU2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Tramminc
Many people have, that's why they stopped making them. in a rearend crash they kept blowing up because of the gas tank location.
Defending Pinto's on a GM forum is kinda pointless, but anyway here goes. LOL

Early Pinto's blew up when you rear ended them because the hard line, fuel line would cause a spark when it snapped in a rear-end crash. Ford corrected the problem with two hose clams and 3" of Neoprene fuel line. They decided not to recall the effected cars because the fix cost $1.15 + labour to fix and they had sold millions of Pinto's. Most small RWD cars in the 70's will also blow up in a rear end crash, Ralph Nader pointed the finger at the best selling subcompact car (The Pinto) because it would pontentially hurt the largest number of people.

So buy a 74 (or later) Pinto or buy a 3" piece of Neopreme fuel line and two clamps.....or better yet put a fuel cell in it. (Like mine has)

302's blowing up in Mustang II's and Pinto's has a more complicated side also. The SBF is a hard engine to keep cool. A Pinto /Mustang II has a really small rad and really small grill. The tiny frontal area compounds the cooling issues. A Mustang II specific bellhousing and factory 10"!! torque convertor have the same effect on the C4's transmission life expectancy. The SBF in stock form in a Mustang II, has no issues, but it is also 139HP So if you have a 400HP fox Mustang, the issues I am having don't effect you.

Beyond the fact making power with an LS is as hard as falling off a log, the LS has much better cooling then a SBF. The 700R4 / 4L60 is a far better transmision then a AOD. (In stock form).

I have seen Ford Mod motors in Mustang II's but they are far more expensive, complicated and physically very large for the tiny Mustang II engine compartment.

P.S The owner on this car now has twin turbo's on it! I don't speak 1/8 mile but I converted his time to be in the 8.80's in the quartermile LOL. He answered all my swap questions.

http://www.youtube.com/user/87gn#p/u/6/CmZpasT7JDw

Last edited by IMACHU2; 11-09-2011 at 02:09 PM. Reason: added kool video
Old 11-09-2011, 02:15 PM
  #68  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
lsxpinto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shawnee, KS
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IMACHU2
Sorry to be the new guy bumping an old thread, but does anyone know if this dood is still a member here or know if he ever finished the car? I
The car was finished. It's ran a best time of 8.02 @176 and last weekend it went 5.14. I can't remember the mph. It belongs to my brother now and he is the one that finished it.

Here is another thread with some info and pics
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...lsx-pinto.html

and here are some videos. He did the 8.02 on drag week.
http://www.youtube.com/user/87gn#p/u/6/CmZpasT7JDw
Old 11-09-2011, 02:25 PM
  #69  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
RATBOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by IMACHU2
302's blowing up in Mustang II's and Pinto's has a more complicated side also. The SBF is a hard engine to keep cool. A Pinto /Mustang II has a really small rad and really small grill. The tiny frontal area compounds the cooling issues. A Mustang II specific bellhousing and factory 10"!! torque convertor have the same effect on the C4's transmission life expectancy. The SBF in stock form in a Mustang II, has no issues, but it is also 139HP So if you have a 400HP fox Mustang, the issues I am having don't effect you.
My 289 71 pinto took a 200 shot like a champ.
Old 11-09-2011, 04:40 PM
  #70  
Staging Lane
 
3xbrowncutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NW PA
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

awesome build dude. always wondered how the fronts of the heads and all that would look polished. looks damn good
Old 11-10-2011, 01:26 PM
  #71  
Teching In
 
IMACHU2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lsxpinto
The car was finished. It's ran a best time of 8.02 @176 and last weekend it went 5.14. I can't remember the mph. It belongs to my brother now and he is the one that finished it.

Here is another thread with some info and pics
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...lsx-pinto.html

and here are some videos. He did the 8.02 on drag week.
http://www.youtube.com/user/87gn#p/u/6/CmZpasT7JDw
Hey other brother, did you get the Corvette engine mounts from the dealer? Do you have any pics of your engine mounts? What vehicle is the front accessory drive off of? Thanks Jason
Old 11-14-2011, 04:03 AM
  #72  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (44)
 
Jeff Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tail of the Dragon's
Posts: 946
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Nice..I remmy that Pinto when I was boy..



Quick Reply: LS1 Pinto project



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.