Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hooker 1964-67 A-body LS swap system preview thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2016, 06:06 PM
  #221  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Toddah
Todd,
Can you tell me if there are bungs installed in the long tube headers and where they are oriented in relation to the transmission?
Yes, there is an O2 bung located on each collector. They are oriented outward towards the frame rails to clear all varieties transmission linkage that may be used. They are also indexed past 10 degrees horizontal to ensure reliable wide band operation.
Old 08-16-2016, 06:09 PM
  #222  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Austin_Jim
Yessir. Already ordered the brackets. Eagerly awaiting the other parts!!!
The engine brackets just went up on the website today, so be sure you've ordered the correct brackets if you ordered them before today.
Old 08-16-2016, 06:28 PM
  #223  
Launching!
 
Austin_Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin area
Posts: 298
Received 120 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toddoky
The engine brackets just went up on the website today, so be sure you've ordered the correct brackets if you ordered them before today.
I ordered them today using the p/n you said. They're the only items in 64-67 A-Body section.
Old 08-16-2016, 07:16 PM
  #224  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Austin_Jim
I ordered them today using the p/n you said. They're the only items in 64-67 A-Body section.
Great, just checking to be sure.
Old 08-18-2016, 03:12 PM
  #225  
Teching In
 
prohandze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ellenwood GA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 64 cutlass

Which mounts do you recommend for 64 cutlass with 5.3 truck engine and FEAD with 4L60 trans?
Old 08-18-2016, 03:18 PM
  #226  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by prohandze
Which mounts do you recommend for 64 cutlass with 5.3 truck engine and FEAD with 4L60 trans?
The forward-bias brackets would be may recommendation. You'll have to swap out the pulley on your power steering pump with one from a early 90's V6 F-body to be able to use the truck FEAD...I can get the pulley part number for you if you need it.
Old 08-18-2016, 07:05 PM
  #227  
Teching In
 
prohandze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ellenwood GA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toddoky
The forward-bias brackets would be may recommendation. You'll have to swap out the pulley on your power steering pump with one from a early 90's V6 F-body to be able to use the truck FEAD...I can get the pulley part number for you if you need it.
yes sir that would be greatly appreciated
Old 08-18-2016, 09:00 PM
  #228  
Staging Lane
 
442scotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 90
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 5.3 in my 65 Cutlass located in the stock location which is rear bias I believe ? I don't think I have more than 1 inch clearance between my Holley 302-2 pan and the crossmember. I was wishing I had gone with the forward positioning but I don't think it would have fit..

You might want to check the crossmember fitment... Rockytopper has a 65 Cutlass and he might be able to comment on this
Old 08-18-2016, 09:19 PM
  #229  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 442scotty
I have a 5.3 in my 65 Cutlass located in the stock location which is rear bias I believe ? I don't think I have more than 1 inch clearance between my Holley 302-2 pan and the crossmember. I was wishing I had gone with the forward positioning but I don't think it would have fit..

You might want to check the crossmember fitment... Rockytopper has a 65 Cutlass and he might be able to comment on this
The new Hooker forward bias, or rear biased engine brackets are compatible for installation with the Holley 302-2 pan...the pan gets close to the engine crossmember with the forward bias brackets, but it does indeed clear.
Old 08-19-2016, 03:00 PM
  #230  
Teching In
 
65LS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rock Hill, S.C.
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Todd, I'm new on here and this may have been asked already but is the new cross member available for the 65 Chevelle? Front bias mounts - correct
Old 08-19-2016, 03:32 PM
  #231  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65LS3
Todd, I'm new on here and this may have been asked already but is the new cross member available for the 65 Chevelle? Front bias mounts - correct
Yes, there is a specific Hooker transmission crossmember ffor the 64-67 A-body applications that is going to be released and available shortly. The components are in our distribution facility and waiting to be boxed up. The crossmember will work with the forward bias and rear bias Hooker engine brackets.

Todd
Old 08-20-2016, 11:12 AM
  #232  
Teching In
 
65LS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rock Hill, S.C.
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Todd....I will be running a 4L70 trans and I thought I saw a post on here that thought a forward bias mount was best. Would that be your choice?
Thanks!
Old 08-20-2016, 11:26 AM
  #233  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65LS3
Todd....I will be running a 4L70 trans and I thought I saw a post on here that thought a forward bias mount was best. Would that be your choice?
Thanks!
Yes, the Hooker forward bias brackets combined with the Holley 302-2 oil pan would be the best option if you want to ensure you achieve clearance between your inner tie-rod ends and oil pan, and achieve desirable U-joint working angles without having to perform any cutting on your tunnel.
Old 08-20-2016, 04:57 PM
  #234  
Teching In
 
65LS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rock Hill, S.C.
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks so much Todd!! Just waiting on the crossmember to get on the shelf.
Old 08-21-2016, 09:16 AM
  #235  
Teching In
 
brad900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Todd,
I see the trans cross member has adapter plates that go inside the frame rail. Does the cross member go inside the frame or just sit on the ends of the adapter plates? The reason I ask is that I'm going to box my frame and if it just sits on the ends of the adapter plates I could box around those.

Thanks
Brad
Old 08-21-2016, 10:35 AM
  #236  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brad900
Todd,
I see the trans cross member has adapter plates that go inside the frame rail. Does the cross member go inside the frame or just sit on the ends of the adapter plates? The reason I ask is that I'm going to box my frame and if it just sits on the ends of the adapter plates I could box around those.

Thanks
Brad
The crossmember ends do extend beyond the inner edges of the frame rails when installed.
Old 08-30-2016, 11:26 AM
  #237  
Teching In
 
65LS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rock Hill, S.C.
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 64 to 67 A Body

Has the cross member from Hooker been released for the 64 - 67 chevelle ?
Old 08-30-2016, 12:04 PM
  #238  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65LS3
Has the cross member from Hooker been released for the 64 - 67 chevelle ?
No, they have not hit the shelf yet. The last report I got through our purchasing department about their having been delivered from our vendor was incorrect; I've been given an updated status report that says they will be shipped to our facility this week.
Old 08-30-2016, 01:13 PM
  #239  
On The Tree
 
old66tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Are you including 2 bungs in each collector? You can't really run a wide band without running both narrow bands for tuning purposes unless you are running open loop all of the time. Otherwise, the tuner will have to weld into the header or into the exhaust pipe to have the tuning bung in the exhaust

Originally Posted by Toddoky
Yes, there is an O2 bung located on each collector. They are oriented outward towards the frame rails to clear all varieties transmission linkage that may be used. They are also indexed past 10 degrees horizontal to ensure reliable wide band operation.
Old 08-30-2016, 02:07 PM
  #240  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by old66tiger
Are you including 2 bungs in each collector? You can't really run a wide band without running both narrow bands for tuning purposes unless you are running open loop all of the time. Otherwise, the tuner will have to weld into the header or into the exhaust pipe to have the tuning bung in the exhaust
No, one bung per side is included. It's almost always easier to find a location for a horizontal bung that will work suitably for narrow band sensors and that is fairly easy to weld in the car. Because of that, I concentrate on finding a location that that will tolerate an upward angled O2 position that would be more difficult to weld in the car. As you've pointed out, you'll have to provide additional bungs if you want to employ wide-band operation, but the task should be easier with this configuration. If someone isn't using wide bands, then the bungs will work just fine with narrow band sensors and work to keep them higher tucked and better protected from road hazards.


Quick Reply: Hooker 1964-67 A-body LS swap system preview thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.