Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1970 GTO Version 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2021 | 06:59 AM
  #221  
will69camaro's Avatar
Sex On Wheels
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo1367
Andrew,
During your lifter preload session, would you mind giving a detailed explanation of what and why you’re doing it w/ pics?

If I keep my LY6, I foresee myself having to do a cam swap( shortly after it’s road worthy). Plus I’m sure it will help out a lot of people.

I’m sure I missed it somewhere, but what lifters are you going to run?thanks,
jim
I don’t think he pulled the heads so whatever lifter came in the motor.

Great question asking if he can detail the lifter preload as I too would like to learn more on that process.
The following 2 users liked this post by will69camaro:
2ToeRacing (07-15-2023), Project GatTagO (04-29-2021)
Old 04-29-2021 | 09:11 AM
  #222  
Jimbo1367's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,927
Likes: 607
Default

That’s right. I forgot he has a low mileage motor. He may not replace them. I just assumed he would.
The following users liked this post:
Project GatTagO (04-29-2021)
Old 04-29-2021 | 09:46 AM
  #223  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

The lifters are stock, whatever came in a 2008 L92. Presumably they are the same as LS7 lifters, which are basically the same lifters that are used in most Gen 4 engines.

Andrew
The following 3 users liked this post by Project GatTagO:
2ToeRacing (07-15-2023), G Atsma (04-29-2021), will69camaro (04-29-2021)
Old 04-29-2021 | 10:43 AM
  #224  
-TheBandit-'s Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 84
From: Instagram @chevyhotrodder
Default

Originally Posted by will69camaro
Great question asking if he can detail the lifter preload as I too would like to learn more on that process.
If it helps, I wrote an explanation of pushroad length / preload check in post 641 of my build thread here.
The following 2 users liked this post by -TheBandit-:
Project GatTagO (04-29-2021), Rick Dorion (01-31-2023)
Old 04-29-2021 | 10:50 AM
  #225  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

Originally Posted by -TheBandit-
If it helps, I wrote an explanation of pushroad length / preload check in post 641 of my build thread here.
Clint,

That's a great write-up! I don't have an adjustable push rod checker, but I do have two lengths of pushrods. So the plan is to check preload with both and see which one gets me into a better range.

It might be time to dig out the balancer that came with my Holley mid-mount, because I am pretty sure it has degree markings all the way around. I don't plan on pinning the balancer, but it will be helpful to have markings when rotating the engine in the firing order, not that figuring out 90 degree increments is that hard...LOL

Andrew
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (04-30-2021)
Old 04-29-2021 | 11:21 AM
  #226  
-TheBandit-'s Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 84
From: Instagram @chevyhotrodder
Default

Let me know if you want me to send you mine to borrow. In case you're not aware, pushrods aren't sized by the end-to-end length; they are sized by a gauge length with a fixed diameter (0.140") datum reference.
Old 04-29-2021 | 11:26 AM
  #227  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 21,513
Likes: 3,277
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by Project GatTagO
Clint,
That's a great write-up! I don't have an adjustable push rod checker, but I do have two lengths of pushrods. So the plan is to check preload with both and see which one gets me into a better range.
Andrew
On this subject, I was a bit surprised that in Summit's reply to my pushrod question, they suggested 7.425 pushrods for an otherwise totally stock configuration, and (normally "stock" size) 7.400 for my setup w/ .040 HG and .020 milled heads. LS7 lifters must like more preload? Your statement above made me think you may end up with a longer-than-"normal" pushrod.
Old 04-30-2021 | 09:54 AM
  #228  
Summitracing's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 1,251
From: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Default

G,

Keep in mind we referenced using the Ghost cam in an otherwise stock LM7. We recommended a 7.425" pushrod due to the .600"/.575" lift of the Ghost cam versus .457"/.466" of the stock LM7 cam. Then drop to a 7.400" when shaving .020" off the heads and going with .040" head gaskets.

Regarding lifter pre-load. With our LS7 spec lifters we recommend .050"-.075" pre-load. Our site might show .050"-.100" but we actually like that a little tighter at .050"-.075". We're having the site fixed to reflect this info.

With one of our .550" lift truck cams, you'd probably be at that 7.400" length with un-milled heads and stock head gaskets. Then with .020" off the heads and .040" head gaskets you'd probably be looking at a 7.375" pushrod.

As always, there are variables. That's why we recommend getting a pushrod length checker before purchasing pushrods
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following 2 users liked this post by Summitracing:
2ToeRacing (07-15-2023), G Atsma (04-30-2021)
Old 04-30-2021 | 10:17 AM
  #229  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 21,513
Likes: 3,277
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by Summitracing
G,

Keep in mind we referenced using the Ghost cam in an otherwise stock LM7. We recommended a 7.425" pushrod due to the .600"/.575" lift of the Ghost cam versus .457"/.466" of the stock LM7 cam. Then drop to a 7.400" when shaving .020" off the heads and going with .040" head gaskets.

Regarding lifter pre-load. With our LS7 spec lifters we recommend .050"-.075" pre-load. Our site might show .050"-.100" but we actually like that a little tighter at .050"-.075". We're having the site fixed to reflect this info.

With one of our .550" lift truck cams, you'd probably be at that 7.400" length with un-milled heads and stock head gaskets. Then with .020" off the heads and .040" head gaskets you'd probably be looking at a 7.375" pushrod.

As always, there are variables. That's why we recommend getting a pushrod length checker before purchasing pushrods
OK, that does make sense as far as what I would need. But why would a higher lift cam need longer pushrods, UNLESS said cam has a smaller than stock base circle?
Old 04-30-2021 | 10:46 AM
  #230  
Summitracing's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 1,251
From: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Default

Yup, you got it G! We'll add to this to clear up any confusion. Anytime we add lift we must take away from the base circle. The nose of the lobe will almost always be .010" under the cam journal OD. The base circle reduction is what adds net lift. This causes the lifter to ride lower in the bore when on the base circle. The end result is the need for a longer pushrod with everything else being the same.
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (04-30-2021)
Old 04-30-2021 | 02:10 PM
  #231  
Jimbo1367's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,927
Likes: 607
Default

SummitRacing,
I did not know this. (No surprise there LOL). -thanks for clearing it up

Andrew,
Sorry to muck up your thread. When does the Terminator X Max get installed?

thank ,
jim
The following users liked this post:
Summitracing (05-03-2021)
Old 04-30-2021 | 04:50 PM
  #232  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 21,513
Likes: 3,277
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo1367
SummitRacing,
I did not know this. (No surprise there LOL). -thanks for clearing it up

Andrew,
Sorry to muck up your thread. When does the Terminator X Max get installed?

thank ,
jim
Same here! Thank you Summit! And thank you Andrew for allowing a few indulgences!
The following users liked this post:
Summitracing (05-03-2021)
Old 05-01-2021 | 12:04 PM
  #233  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

Yesterday I sorted out the push rod situation.

I started the check preload on #1 cylinder and things didn't add up, because as I tightened the rocker bolt the valves started to open...

Then I remembered that something similar was happening when I did the cam install on the Cougar. A little more digging around and consulting a buddy that knows more about this than I do, and it all started to make sense.

So in fact, when the cam and crank are lined up dot to dot, this is #1 cylinder on the overlap stroke. My buddy confirmed this. Since #1 is on overlap, this means that #6 is on the compression stroke.

Here you can clearly see that the #1 lifters are not on the base circle.





Here is a comparison between the old 7.400" pushrods on the right and the Summit 7.425" pushrods on the left. The tips appear to be a little smaller on the Summit pushrods, so I think their effective length falls somewhere between 7.400" and 7.425". None of this really matters because what I am after is 1.5 turns from zero lash to full torque spec on the rocker bolts.



I made some marks on the balancer bolt for reference. I really should have done this before I installed the front cover.



In any case, I started with #6, and the Summit Racing 11/32 7.425" pushrods ended up giving me the best preload.



Then I rotated the engine 90 degrees and followed the firing order for all subsequent cylinders. Once I got the technique down for finding zero lash, the preload readings were pretty consistent with 1.5 turns on the intake valves and about 1.6 turns on the exhaust valves.

I am calling that done and sorted.

Andrew
The following 2 users liked this post by Project GatTagO:
2ToeRacing (07-15-2023), Summitracing (05-03-2021)
Old 05-02-2021 | 10:04 AM
  #234  
Jimbo1367's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,927
Likes: 607
Default

So once you have #1 on TDC, you did both valves? Then turn the crank 90* and do the same following the firing order?

thanks,
jim
Old 05-02-2021 | 10:55 AM
  #235  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo1367
So once you have #1 on TDC, you did both valves? Then turn the crank 90* and do the same following the firing order?

thanks,
jim
It's not just TDC, the piston has to be at TDC on the compression stroke, which is when both valves are closed.

The way I had it lined up originally was with #1 at TDC on the overlap stroke, which is why the lifters were not on the cam base circle and why the valves were opening as I tightened down the rockers. I kept the engine in the same location, and simply moved to the #6 cylinder which is at TDC on the compression stroke. Then I picked up the firing order starting from #6.

Andrew
Old 05-02-2021 | 09:15 PM
  #236  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

It feels good to be putting stuff back together instead of taking things apart.

This is a new LS3 style valley cover. I really like the internal baffling to keep oil out of the intake.





These are the tall Holley valve covers in red. These will add a touch of color and the red is almost a perfect match to the color of the car.







Just cleaned up the coils and will probably get some ARP stainless bots for the coils.



Andrew
The following 4 users liked this post by Project GatTagO:
2ToeRacing (07-15-2023), G Atsma (05-02-2021), Summitracing (05-03-2021), will69camaro (05-02-2021)
Old 05-03-2021 | 09:42 PM
  #237  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

Ordered a balancer installed tool the other day and it came this morning. So I was able to install the hub of the ATI balancer that comes with the deluxe Holley mid-mount accessory drive kit.



Then the balancer ring gets bolted to the hub. The ATI balancer is a really nice piece.



I didn't torque the balancer bolt yet, and I am not exactly sure if it is on all the way. This was as far as it would go with the installer tool. Hopefully it is fully seated.



Also got new injector 0-rings...



and new intake manifold gaskets. The old ones were in good shape, but I figured it can't hurt.



The intake manifold cleaned up nicely...



Andrew
The following users liked this post:
Mikes64 (05-04-2021)
Old 05-04-2021 | 11:57 AM
  #238  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

This is the lube that I like to use for injector o-rings.



Also received some ARP stainless header bolts.



Added an Earl's fuel rail adapter. I like this style because it has metal retaining tabs inside and a secondary retention clip.



Looks like Holley revised their injector harness and they are now adding heat shrink labels on the cylinders.



I played around with different routing for the injector harness and I like something like this, on the inside of the rail. I have some different P clamps coming to secure the harness to the studs that hold the fuel rail.



I didn't like how the injectors had about 4 inched of exposed wire, so I used some Tessa harness tape to protect them a little more. Plus this makes the wires blend in.



The coil harness will be retained by the little clips on the rails. I have an assortment of those clips on the way.



Andrew
The following 2 users liked this post by Project GatTagO:
G Atsma (05-04-2021), will69camaro (05-04-2021)
Old 05-04-2021 | 04:37 PM
  #239  
LS1 TJ's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 367
Default

Back in the day that tape I think it was called friction tape?
The following users liked this post:
Project GatTagO (05-05-2021)
Old 05-05-2021 | 12:00 PM
  #240  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

Originally Posted by LS1 TJ
Back in the day that tape I think it was called friction tape?
If you look carefully those rolls are not the same. The one on the right is more like cotton friction tape. The one on the right is thinner and has a soft feel to it. Tessa calls it "Mercedes/BMW/VW harness tape."

Andrew


Quick Reply: 1970 GTO Version 3.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.