Fastest N/A, Cam Only, all LS engines
#162
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BS3 sucks. I'd rather have a stock computer lol.
You know what it takes. You probably also know how it feels when people try and discredit.
Last edited by vetteboy2k; 10-29-2014 at 10:50 AM.
#165
He wants you to believe his car ran "Cam Only."
Of course with an untouched LS6 long block, untouched LS6 heads with stock valves, stock valve job, stock computer, no cylinder to cylinder tuning, stock M6 without being faceplated, "gasoline", stock unmachined pistons, stock rod bolts, etc.....
"Cam Only"
Of course with an untouched LS6 long block, untouched LS6 heads with stock valves, stock valve job, stock computer, no cylinder to cylinder tuning, stock M6 without being faceplated, "gasoline", stock unmachined pistons, stock rod bolts, etc.....
"Cam Only"
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...l#post10624588
"All times must be on stock heads, crank, rods and pistons."
#166
8 Second Club
iTrader: (76)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Based on this, it seems the car fits.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...l#post10624588
"All times must be on stock heads, crank, rods and pistons."
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...l#post10624588
"All times must be on stock heads, crank, rods and pistons."
#167
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But I'm confident we can get the car to run the same times without flycutting pistons or bs3. In fact I would prefer a smaller/ lower peaking cam which would put me more in the powerband.
I cut a 1.464 on that 9.80 pass. If I ever figure out the launch it's gonna go much quicker. So what's next to complain about?
And my car is not even tuned much. I can tell you mu AFR is in the low 12's
I don't have a 4000 stall converter or a trans brake. My buddy cut a 1.22 60' with a 4000 stall converter in a street car with bone stock suspension.
So I have to overcome those disadvantages.
I can't fit a 30" tire or get a gear ratio greater than 4.10 so ever more of a disadvantage.
And try launching on a c5 rear..........
We can go on and on.
Bot now, at least, you have true facts from the horse's mouth and not some hear say.
We all spend a lot of time and effort to do what we do. I always give credit to people who run fast times because I know how much work goes into it.
People have different opinions of what's cam only. I get that and accept it. I posted in here, without much faith that the list is still alive, because we fit rules stated in this thread.
I don't make the rules or care what they are. I make sure I fit the rules and post my results. And again, it's just some silly internet stuff anyway.
If you ever want to know the truth about stuff then call me directly.
#168
I took some time to search out this company after reading their "going out of business thread" and stumbled across this thread.
These douschebags talked all kinds of crap in this thread and fell Over 3 tenths short of this record.....
Now it's apparent that they ripped quite a few people off AND they can't back up their trash talking.
Hopefully in the future people search out ALL posts from Advertisers and NOT just threads they're selling themselves in.
Just reading how they conduct themselves in this thread would've shown how unprofessional they were.
Although I have to laugh at their failures, I feel for those effected financially from them.
BTW....I never realized someone had gone this quick "Cam Only" with an LS1 and that nobody has even come close to challenging it in the past 2 years.
Nice job to the OP and those involved.
These douschebags talked all kinds of crap in this thread and fell Over 3 tenths short of this record.....
Now it's apparent that they ripped quite a few people off AND they can't back up their trash talking.
Hopefully in the future people search out ALL posts from Advertisers and NOT just threads they're selling themselves in.
Just reading how they conduct themselves in this thread would've shown how unprofessional they were.
Although I have to laugh at their failures, I feel for those effected financially from them.
BTW....I never realized someone had gone this quick "Cam Only" with an LS1 and that nobody has even come close to challenging it in the past 2 years.
Nice job to the OP and those involved.
Show me where YOUR 9.32 @ 148 is here.....
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...-n-any-cu.html
Destroked LS7 with a restricted stock computer and another motor for this spring sounds Incredibly familiar with someone elses car.
Complete coincidece right?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...-n-any-cu.html
Destroked LS7 with a restricted stock computer and another motor for this spring sounds Incredibly familiar with someone elses car.
Complete coincidece right?
He wants you to believe his car ran "Cam Only."
Of course with an untouched LS6 long block, untouched LS6 heads with stock valves, stock valve job, stock computer, no cylinder to cylinder tuning, stock M6 without being faceplated, "gasoline", stock unmachined pistons, stock rod bolts, etc.....
"Cam Only"
Of course with an untouched LS6 long block, untouched LS6 heads with stock valves, stock valve job, stock computer, no cylinder to cylinder tuning, stock M6 without being faceplated, "gasoline", stock unmachined pistons, stock rod bolts, etc.....
"Cam Only"
#169
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And stock valve springs.
But it doesn't matter. You ran fast for what you had and so did we and other similar cars.
The launch is holding us back. The performance is not dependent on flycut, bs3, or valvetrain.
The other cam I spec'd out will work better and I could spin to 7000 and make more average power. I could run a near stock valve train (aftermarket springs), have a stronger piston with a little more compression, and put in a stock computer and tune it well.
The car will probably run faster. But those things don't matter. It's not worth changing them out to fit some people's description. I fit the rules in this thread.
But it doesn't matter. You ran fast for what you had and so did we and other similar cars.
The launch is holding us back. The performance is not dependent on flycut, bs3, or valvetrain.
The other cam I spec'd out will work better and I could spin to 7000 and make more average power. I could run a near stock valve train (aftermarket springs), have a stronger piston with a little more compression, and put in a stock computer and tune it well.
The car will probably run faster. But those things don't matter. It's not worth changing them out to fit some people's description. I fit the rules in this thread.
#171
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You really have no clue about my setup or bs3 and how it affects my car. I don't know why you think you do. I don't know you and I'm betting you have never seen my car except on a video loop.
Still not sure why you care so much. I suppose it will only be worse if we go faster?
If a car has bs3 they shouldn't be on the cam only list?
There must be more to the hating.
Last edited by vetteboy2k; 10-29-2014 at 02:51 PM.
#172
8 Second Club
iTrader: (76)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Under your definition you're not cam only either.
You really have no clue about my setup or bs3 and how it affects my car. I don't know why you think you do. I don't know you and I'm betting you have never seen my car except on a video loop.
Still not sure why you care so much. I suppose it will only be worse if we go faster?
If a car has bs3 they shouldn't be on the cam only list?
There must be more to the hating.
You really have no clue about my setup or bs3 and how it affects my car. I don't know why you think you do. I don't know you and I'm betting you have never seen my car except on a video loop.
Still not sure why you care so much. I suppose it will only be worse if we go faster?
If a car has bs3 they shouldn't be on the cam only list?
There must be more to the hating.
My car was Under my def my car was 100% cam only , stock rods stock pistons not fly cut unlike you , stock head gaskets UNLIKE YOU , Stock heads Unlike you , Stock rockers , Not hating one bit your just a look at me bullshit artist
#173
Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That would be a NO
I gaurantee you picked up 20-30 RWHP with your 8 widebands and cyclinder to cylinder tuning from your Big Stuff 3 that you don't like.
You don't have a legit LS6 "Cam Only" engine.
No LS6 came with valve reliefs.
No LS6 came with hardened rod bolts.
Are the valves and valve job stock the way GM sent those heads down the assembly line?
I gaurantee you picked up 20-30 RWHP with your 8 widebands and cyclinder to cylinder tuning from your Big Stuff 3 that you don't like.
You don't have a legit LS6 "Cam Only" engine.
No LS6 came with valve reliefs.
No LS6 came with hardened rod bolts.
Are the valves and valve job stock the way GM sent those heads down the assembly line?
Last edited by firehawk 385; 10-29-2014 at 08:38 PM.
#174
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm surprised that you would act that way, unless someone is feeding you lies and BS, especially after what you have been through yourself online. I just read your thread for the first time. Apparently you had stuff you didn't want people to know. I would never comment on something or someone I didn't know or know about. Someone not too long ago was telling me a bunch of unknown details about a cam only f-body. I was half listening but I'm now thinking maybe it was your car? Regardless I wouldn't repeat what was said out of respect and because It's just not my place.
And I'm not sure what your MO is and why you think you know me or my car. To make comments about me without knowing me is ignorant.
If the hostility is because of a silly internet list then that's just weak. After all there are 2 separate lists for different types of cars.
So you are still the cam-only top dog as long as you don't scroll down the page to Corvettes.
Your record cam-only time slip looks very similar to my (SI) bolt-on only time slip except you had a better 60' by ~.13 and ran in better air.
There's room for everybody. Accept it.
I'll post again in this section if we go faster as cam-only but once the personal insults start I'm done with the debate.
#176
Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Better air? Since when does air quality effect E85 the same as a gasoline burning engine?
You are B/S from your 1st word to your last.
#179
Now that's not nice especially when he was extending an olive branch to you. I'm sure that you were very happy to hear that he moved on from Bolt-Ons. That 10.02 was getting too close for comfort. Oh wait, that BS3 made such a huge difference on that Bolt-On setup. Perhaps you may wish to read a little more on the owner/driver/designer of that particular car and past builds before making statements that are deformation of character. Instead you listen to some inbred from who knows where. (I have friends from WV and the stalker is too ignorant to be from there.) You guys want to make me
#180
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the record, I dont see any reason that BS3 or any other computer would disqualify from this list. EVERYONE on this list has a modified tune, this guy just took it further than most. Does it make more power because of it? **** yeah... if that upsets you, go get a BS3. That being said, the bare heads should be BONE STOCK. Springs, pushrods, lifters, rockers, etc. are all fine with me (and fit the list), but modifying the casting should be considered heads/cam.