Quickest stock internal 2.73 car?
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Buddy ran 7.7@88.. Ls1 Intake and full weight with stock tune.98 trans am
Only mode were
Lid
4000 ptc converter
Pacesetter long tubes
2.5"xpipe with 1 chambers
It probably would have went 12.1s.. ls6 intake, tune, drag rims, better da than the 2500 he ran in and 11s would had been attained easily.
Only mode were
Lid
4000 ptc converter
Pacesetter long tubes
2.5"xpipe with 1 chambers
It probably would have went 12.1s.. ls6 intake, tune, drag rims, better da than the 2500 he ran in and 11s would had been attained easily.
#7
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: STL
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Buddy ran 7.7@88.. Ls1 Intake and full weight with stock tune.98 trans am
Only mode were
Lid
4000 ptc converter
Pacesetter long tubes
2.5"xpipe with 1 chambers
It probably would have went 12.1s.. ls6 intake, tune, drag rims, better da than the 2500 he ran in and 11s would had been attained easily.
Only mode were
Lid
4000 ptc converter
Pacesetter long tubes
2.5"xpipe with 1 chambers
It probably would have went 12.1s.. ls6 intake, tune, drag rims, better da than the 2500 he ran in and 11s would had been attained easily.
Trending Topics
#9
![Thumbs up](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon14.gif)
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)