Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

400 HP internally stock no Power adder?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2004, 12:57 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bullshit. Bad dyno operator.
DenzSS is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 02:09 PM
  #22  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
WAHUSKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is a pretty healthy setup. The Kooks are just about the best for power, & the water pump & LSX are both good for up to 10hp, and the flywheel might trick a few more out of it by rpm-ing faster. But 400rwhp is a LOT from a stock motor. Maybe if this were true also:

LS6 block (25% OF 02's got them), 1.8 rocker arms (according to "the rules" this still qualifies as stock internals), MAF ends & ported TB....no cats, a cutout, etc. Oh Hell, just say bolt everything you can think of on it, and then MAYBE! But it would have to be a perfect match of parts. And it would have to happen in Texas.
WAHUSKER is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 02:13 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Sorry, an HONEST 400 ft/lbs of TQ internally stock on a dynojet ain't happening.
Colonel is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 03:48 PM
  #24  
On The Tree
 
98tata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default from what i seen

Originally Posted by Colonel
Sorry, an HONEST 400 ft/lbs of TQ internally stock on a dynojet ain't happening.
from what i seen on the car the mods looked to be kooks 1 7/8 long tubes with a true custom mandrel bent 4 inch exhaust with a single 4 inch borla muffler and turn down, it has a big mass air and lid with no filter and a lsx intake with a electric w.p and no a/c belt and an edit tune and the car was low on gas if that matters those car usally make around 320 stock and add a set of kooks long tubes 1 7/8 with a custom cat back 4 inch id say you would get around 350 to 360 hp and the lid and maf combo im sure is good for 10 right so theres 370 or so and then the elect w.p gained i think 5 to 10 so theres 375 to 380 then you add the lsx intake there another 10 to 20 from what i have seen on here plus a good tune for all these mods that seems like it would make close to 400 to me i could be wrong i am not a ls1 master but?
sounds to me like he knows edit pretty good too. i know on a certin vette that did like 300 to the wheels then got a 1 7/8 headers and exhaust and a tune for the combo and pulled out 350 or so hp, and have seen it do it on only those mods but like i said who knows?
and yes i might get flammed for this reply but what do i care.
98tata is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 03:49 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
 
98tata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default colonel didnt mean to quote you

i hit the wrong reply, pardon me
98tata is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 04:00 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You just can't add up the gains like that. If you hit 350rwhp internally stock you have done a good job. Anything else is BS or a bad/deceptive dyno operator.

HP gains are not linear. You can only go so far before you have eliminated all significant external bottlenecks.
DenzSS is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 04:07 PM
  #27  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DenzSS
You just can't add up the gains like that. If you hit 350rwhp internally stock you have done a good job. Anything else is BS or a bad/deceptive dyno operator.

HP gains are not linear. You can only go so far before you have eliminated all significant external bottlenecks.
jrp is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 04:07 PM
  #28  
On The Tree
 
98tata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and thats a reasonable reply in some terms sounds to be correct, but how with the car on the dyno and being used all day can he get the numbers to change in his favor im curious? i mean cause most cars there did alil lower than there dynos not to long ago? and also i thought dynojet is the standard for most hp number because you cant munipulate the numbers? right or wrong? and if the car went to a diffrent dyno place with a diffrent operator and still on a dynojet would that make a diff. if it did the same numbers?
98tata is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 06:18 PM
  #29  
TECH Resident
 
H82BBad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chattanooga,Tn
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

people are not saying he got the numbers to change. They are saying that the car is not stock on the internals!
H82BBad is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 07:15 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

People lie all the time. What I, and others, have said is correct.

Keeping it conservative and giving a M6/10-bolt combination a 10% drivetrain loss equates a 440fwhp internally stock motor. That gives us a 1.27hp/ci efficiency. Considering many head/cam cars do not reach that level, a stock internal motor in no way may accomplish that feat.

1.25hp/ci is considered to be a good, well built motor. Internal work has been done. The stock compression ratio, cylinder head charactics, and cam profile dictate that 400rwhp from an internally stock motor is IMPOSSIBLE. I've seen and/or dyno'd around 100 LS1s and LS6s. 350rwhp is a very high mark that only a handful will meet. I've seen it, but it is incredibly rare.
DenzSS is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 08:34 PM
  #31  
Launching!
 
Cmarsh93z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have 750-800 Ls1edit files in my computer, so I have done my fair share of dynoing I have NEVER seen a stock F-body dyno ANYWHERE near 400rwhp. I have had 2 cars, both 02's...that have full boltson, duals, ect....tuned to perfection, make 366-370rwhp. I can't see another 30 rwhp in there, anywhere!

Chris
AMS RACING
Cmarsh93z is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 09:04 PM
  #32  
Staging Lane
 
Spindoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think Silver Slayer was looking for fact, not opinion.

I am the tuner and the dyno operator. I can assure you there was no funny business. Anyone who doesn't believe it can put your money where your mouth is.
Spindoctor is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 10:04 PM
  #33  
TECH Enthusiast
 
1ORANGEWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spindoctor
I think Silver Slayer was looking for fact, not opinion.

I am the tuner and the dyno operator. I can assure you there was no funny business. Anyone who doesn't believe it can put your money where your mouth is.

There are a lot replies to his post from reputable tunners that state what they know from their experience in their day to day workings with the LS1. I'm sure that you have your own experiences working in your shop. So from what they've delt with it fact. I personally don't see how it could be 401/400 through a stock enternals motor with bolt-ons considering some h/c cars don't reach those numbers. Maybe the car mentioned was a freak to start with, and with your "X" package it made 401/400 some of them just said it was rare. If the "X" package is as good as you say it is and its on the cutting edge your going to have to endure a little :BS before you get the praise. If its that good you will have lots of business in the future. I think the thing here is repeatability. I know no two car are alike but if you can duplicate the numbers with your package on other cars it might be more believable. Maybe you should put your money where your mouth is!
1ORANGEWS6 is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 10:09 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
 
H82BBad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chattanooga,Tn
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how about that xxx package? Have you ever done one yet? 560 rwhp in a hyd cam 427 stroker?
H82BBad is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 10:58 PM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
 
1ORANGEWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hmmm... from reading your sig I would think that you would be Brent. Who are you asking those questions to?
1ORANGEWS6 is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:03 PM
  #36  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Unusual T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ft worth tx
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Total bs and nothing more. Someone can't operate a dyno correctly. I did 368/378 stock internal. 400rwhp is not possible with stock internals ROFL!
Unusual T/A is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:44 PM
  #37  
TECH Resident
 
H82BBad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chattanooga,Tn
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1ORANGEWS6
Hmmm... from reading your sig I would think that you would be Brent. Who are you asking those questions to?
the dr.
H82BBad is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:47 PM
  #38  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spindoctor
I think Silver Slayer was looking for fact, not opinion.

I am the tuner and the dyno operator. I can assure you there was no funny business. Anyone who doesn't believe it can put your money where your mouth is.
You're not fooling anyone who's been around the block a time or two. You can't get that kind of TQ internally stock. It just won't flow that kind of air even with ALL external restrictions removed.

Money where my mouth is? Sure..but how? Do I doubt that the car can come to ANOTHER unbiased dynojet and lay down over 400/400? No. Do I believe it internally stock (in my book that means LS1 cam, untouched LS1 heads, and never having had the valve covers off) and NA? Not on your life. I was pulling 11.5s internally stock 4 years ago when most of the rest of the best were still in the 12s. And I've put down 359 RWHP with an internally stock '02 A4 LS1. I KNOW all the tricks and I know what these engines are capable and 400/400 ain't it.

Electric water pumps and LSx intakes don't add that much to a bolt-on car for those of you who are buying this. All the rest of the mods are pretty standard, IMO.
Colonel is offline  
Old 04-13-2004, 12:09 AM
  #39  
Staging Lane
 
Spindoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unusual T/A
Total bs and nothing more. Someone can't operate a dyno correctly. I did 368/378 stock internal. 400rwhp is not possible with stock internals ROFL!
Wanna Bet?
Spindoctor is offline  
Old 04-13-2004, 12:26 AM
  #40  
TECH Resident
 
16nrollininaws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Land of rocks and boredom
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The whole thing about factory "freaks" being factored into this equation, I still dont really see a way to get those numbers. Your car has something, whether you admit it/know it that is getting you those numbers, whether it be the actual Dyno or a mod. I say you take it to a reputable dyno and have some witnesses from this board go along if you are as confident as you seem.
16nrollininaws6 is offline  


Quick Reply: 400 HP internally stock no Power adder?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 PM.