Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Are Dyno's hard on the motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2006, 12:12 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
fultz1275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Are Dyno's hard on the motor

I have been told that the chassis dyno is hard on the crank, rods, main bearings, etc. However DynoJet claims that their free-wheeling model puts 75% less stress on components. I have a new motor with 2000 miles on it and would like to put it on the chassis dyno to get an accurate bhp, but I am a little gun shy of damaging the motor. Any thoughts-suggestions-things to avoid would be very helpful.
Old 06-06-2006, 12:23 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
ThirdGenLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well first of all you wont get bhp, you'll get rwhp, but anyways you'll be just fine. You wont put anymore stress on the engine then you would on the street
Old 06-06-2006, 01:27 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Alot less friction is present on a dyno, the rollers free spin pretty much. So that alone causes less strain then punching it on the street.
Old 06-07-2006, 11:37 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dynocar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Chassis dynos save engines from being destroyed. A properly operated dyno is less harmful to an engine because many vitals can be monitored such as A/F ratio, fuel pressure, timing etc during testing. Eventually, many experimental tuners find there way to a dyno but often too late, after they have gone thru a few engines. A dyno that puts 75% less stress to an engine is not as affective at such testing as one that correctly simulates actual engine loads.
Old 06-08-2006, 11:43 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
ls1charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

i know i guy thats making over 600 on spray on a stock bottom end thats made like 50-60 dyno pulls and hes never had one prob; youll be just fine.
Old 06-14-2006, 06:52 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
BriancWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Garage
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Free-revving is worse on an engine than going through the rpms with load. Like revving to 6500 through 1st is not as stressful as revving it up to 6500 in N.

Bottom line strap it on the dyno and let her rip, it'll be alright.....
Old 06-14-2006, 11:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BriancWS6
Free-revving is worse on an engine than going through the rpms with load. Like revving to 6500 through 1st is not as stressful as revving it up to 6500 in N.
+1, i was looking to see if anyone posted this or not..
Old 06-15-2006, 01:50 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
steveo346's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Antonio,Tx
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

dyno.....dyno.....dyno.......

just do it!!!
Old 10-05-2007, 07:08 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Cody1112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I blew the mass air flow sensor off mine a dyno.
Old 10-08-2007, 08:10 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
99DWPTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Were the clamps tight??

Originally Posted by Cody1112
I blew the mass air flow sensor off mine a dyno.
Old 10-08-2007, 08:27 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
kyles2000z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cody1112
I blew the mass air flow sensor off mine a dyno.
dont think that has anything to do with the dyno
Old 10-08-2007, 08:49 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A properly operated dyno is less stressful then running it on the street.
Old 10-09-2007, 04:43 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
WMSuperSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've been told by a reputable transmission builder that the dyno is brutal on a tranny, though.
Old 10-09-2007, 06:38 AM
  #14  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Willem @ Fuel Injection Concepts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
A properly operated dyno is less stressful then running it on the street.
Sort of False.. While you can monitor everything easier and all, for higher hp cars the majority will be roasting the tires on the street. On the dyno when you've got a ballast on the rear tires keeping them sticking to the rollers and not spinning you are putting more load on the car than the street ever will.

Get what I'm saying?
Old 10-09-2007, 09:54 AM
  #15  
Staging Lane
 
LS1-Inside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fultz1275
I have been told that the chassis dyno is hard on the crank, rods, main bearings, etc. However DynoJet claims that their free-wheeling model puts 75% less stress on components. I have a new motor with 2000 miles on it and would like to put it on the chassis dyno to get an accurate bhp, but I am a little gun shy of damaging the motor. Any thoughts-suggestions-things to avoid would be very helpful.
Think of it this way... The dyno won't be any more stressful on your engine than putting it in 4th and flooring it up to redline...

Sure there's stress, and load, etc etc... but umm... thats what your engine is designed for...

Don't listen to all the fear mongering...

-Dan
Old 10-09-2007, 10:12 AM
  #16  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
edcmat-l1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cody1112
I blew the mass air flow sensor off mine a dyno.
Old 10-09-2007, 11:22 AM
  #17  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
scottHMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a Dyno is DEFINATELY more stressful than running it on the street. The car is trying to roll some rollers while its strapped to the ground but the suspension is pressing down, so not only does it have to fight its own weight, but the pressure applied by the suspension aswell. AND, a dyno will never have the cooling that a 4th gear pull could ever have.
Old 10-09-2007, 11:29 AM
  #18  
Staging Lane
 
LS1-Inside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scottHMT
a Dyno is DEFINATELY more stressful than running it on the street. The car is trying to roll some rollers while its strapped to the ground but the suspension is pressing down, so not only does it have to fight its own weight, but the pressure applied by the suspension aswell. AND, a dyno will never have the cooling that a 4th gear pull could ever have.
You're absolutely right. You should never put your car on a dyno. The stress is just not worth it...


As for the OP: Remember, Don't listen to all the "Fear Mongering" people babble on about stuff like it's the ultimate engine killer...

...It's a dyno pull... it's a load on an engine... Believe it or not, your engine is designed to work under loads, and a dyno pull is just another kind of load for your engine to handle.

If you don't want to put any stress on your engine. Don't EVER start your car. Because just running your engine is creating stress...

-Dan
Old 10-09-2007, 11:41 AM
  #19  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
edcmat-l1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scottHMT
a Dyno is DEFINATELY more stressful than running it on the street. The car is trying to roll some rollers while its strapped to the ground but the suspension is pressing down, so not only does it have to fight its own weight, but the pressure applied by the suspension aswell. AND, a dyno will never have the cooling that a 4th gear pull could ever have.
Apparently you have ZERO Dyno experience. You dont have the suspension "pressing down" on the rollers. You strap them around the axle tubes on solid rear cars, or the cradles on Vettes. The ONLY time you use the suspension for load is in high hp cars that want to spin the tires. and then you NEED to have the added load. And even so, how is that more stressful than hammering it on the street or track?
Old 10-10-2007, 07:48 PM
  #20  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
scottHMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, maybe i just have crappy dyno operators, because I have hadd cars that ran well on the street and blew headgaskets on the dyno. One of which was my nitrous LS1 =[. Im going to say a dyno is harder on a car than on the street, due low airflow, even if the dyno shop has a fan. It simply cannot recreate the force of air coming through the radiator when the car is in motion.


Quick Reply: Are Dyno's hard on the motor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.