sschoeffler

iTrader: (24)

Which one is better and why? They both cost about the same on ebay.

LC1

Pros
Comes with logworks
Accurate
Uses the Bosch Sensor

Cons
Damned ugly bland *** gauge (Only reason I dont want it)
Does not match my gauge setup at all

AEM UEGO

Pros
Good looking gauge
Accurate
Uses the Bosch Sensor

Cons
No Logging Software

Now I am running HP Tuners MPVI Pro so I dont think I need the logworks from the Innovative kit. Both sensors have the input wire for the HP Tuners.
The question I am wondering is is there a specific reason I should go with the LC1 over the AEM Model? Will the Innovative benefit me over the AEM model? Lemme know what you folks think.

yelo04goat

iTrader: (11)

i got the innovate wideband.... i got the G3 gauge it doesnt look bad at all and close to matches the GTO speedo and stuff... also got the G3 boost to match should look good when they go in...

dont know what is better or worse....

Sweet_SS

AEM UGO...best IMO. I had this on my last car and it was very accurate. Just use that input on your HP Tuners and your set.

C5kid

iTrader: (12)

Had nothing but problems w/ my LC1. It was a full 2 points off at times, the final straw was when it would only work for 2-3 mins before reading nothing but 20.8.

slow67

iTrader: (2)

I like the NGK AFX.

Dragframe

iTrader: (14)

lc1 install is much more involved.... aem is a bit simpler. But i do believe the lc1 is a great product..... if they could just get their problems ironed out.

Had the lc1 for a short time and loved it. Had the gauge that looked like most of autometers guages... It broke and they replaced it but i did not want to go through wiring it in again. I bought the fast and wished i never would have stopped using the lc1

Sweet_SS

Also, I can get a AEM UEGO brand new for $170 locally he he

IMPATIENT 1

not bad! i picked mine up from a ebay seller who had alot of em at bout the same price, jus a tad higher.i like that the o2 sensor itself is self calibrating, and cheap to replace! matches my tru-boost controller too

IWGF

iTrader: (6)

I'm running the AEM EUGO and it is spot on accurate. Install was retarded easy as well.

sschoeffler

iTrader: (24)

Looks like the AEM UEGO is the way to go

93camaro_zzz

iTrader: (13)

What options do you have if you just have the regular HPtuners kit, and not the pro version. With the AEM, I have no data logging capabilities then. Correct?

sschoeffler

iTrader: (24)

From what I hear you can fudge the software and hook your widebands data wire through another sensor such as the A/C sensor or the EGR Sensor then set up your values for the wideband under one of those 2 sensor PID locations. There are writeups on how to do it, here is one with pics:

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-s...hp-tuners.html

98Z28CobraKiller

iTrader: (17)

That's my next one.

Texas_WS6

iTrader: (9)

I have run the PLX (****), the NGK AFX and it works perfectly ( I have three now), and I am also using the LC-1 on a project. I did experience some isuess with the LC-1 on the project. Realy I think the AEm, the NGK, and the LC stuff are all pretty much the same quality and reliability.

cracker

iTrader: (1)

Nothing but problems with NUMEROUS Innovate products....Their wideband being the worst.

Switched multiple cars to the AEM and the problems dissipated. Plus we've done numerous test with the AEM's vs. the dyno and they have been spot on.

-W

Tally TransAm

iTrader: (17)

i havent had a single issue with my lc1. all the connections are soldered and grounded correctly and it works great

tomz28

iTrader: (20)

same here, i got a AEM right now

I_Need_Land

iTrader: (12)

i had mega issues with my lc1 as well, gave up after replacing 4 sensors and having them all crap out within 2 months each.

sschoeffler

iTrader: (24)

Looks like the AEM UEGO is winning by a longshot. I placed my order to summit and got it for $160.00

built408

iTrader: (10)

After my last 2 LC-1's crapped out, I'll never buy another one. Ive had good luck with the PLX, NGK, and Autometers.