Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

1142 rwhp 1147 rwtq budget 347 w/ GT-88

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2011, 07:27 PM
  #41  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,972
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Effin' sick dude, congrats! What are you doing for fastening on the heads? Just ARP studs, no pushing water at that boost? I would really look into some adjustable rockers, AFR's are notorious for screwing up valve guides with stock rockers. I had 4 in each head that had to be replaced, buddy had more, and another local car is starting to burn oil too. Sick setup, I'd like to check it out personally at TX2K11 if that's cool.
Old 01-16-2011, 08:16 PM
  #42  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Great power!! Bad *** car! Congrats
Old 01-16-2011, 08:23 PM
  #43  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
AutomagicLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shawnee,KS
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 'Trust'
Effin' sick dude, congrats! What are you doing for fastening on the heads? Just ARP studs, no pushing water at that boost? I would really look into some adjustable rockers, AFR's are notorious for screwing up valve guides with stock rockers. I had 4 in each head that had to be replaced, buddy had more, and another local car is starting to burn oil too. Sick setup, I'd like to check it out personally at TX2K11 if that's cool.
Sounds good man hit me up when we get down there. THe car has Just ARP studs and LS9 gaskets. I am on stock rockers and will probably keep it that way for awhile. I had a set of comp pro mag rockers on my n/a setup and they fucked some **** up...caused serious valve float at high rpms
Old 01-16-2011, 08:33 PM
  #44  
Teching In
 
giovannysg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Queretarock!!, Mexico
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

damn! that was impressive congrats for getting the numbers you wanted
Old 01-16-2011, 08:47 PM
  #45  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
js2fst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: K.C.
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Killer build
Old 01-16-2011, 08:51 PM
  #46  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (17)
 
02LS1ram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lehigh Valley ,PA
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

wow crazy dyno vid, id love to go for a ride in that thing
Old 01-16-2011, 09:01 PM
  #47  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
AutomagicLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shawnee,KS
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Rick_Vor
Awesome #'s Curtis. Ubber impressive.

How was the idle/low speed tuning with the 160's?

Any other changes to the fuel system? Weren't you running dual 255's and 8 feed, 6 return?

Rick
Eh the 160's are a little rich on Decel and idle but it doesn't mess with the way the car runs. It was either $800 bucks for a set of injectors and a box or almost $1300 for high impedance injectors..
Old 01-16-2011, 09:18 PM
  #48  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
ries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

damn I wish I had E85 available in my area...great results
Old 01-16-2011, 09:21 PM
  #49  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
BLWN1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,874
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I ll assume GT88 is a T6?
Old 01-16-2011, 09:29 PM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
AutomagicLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shawnee,KS
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BLWN1
I ll assume GT88 is a T6?
yes & 1.08 AR
Old 01-16-2011, 09:39 PM
  #51  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,972
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AutomagicLS1
Eh the 160's are a little rich on Decel and idle but it doesn't mess with the way the car runs. It was either $800 bucks for a set of injectors and a box or almost $1300 for high impedance injectors..
Would you have preferred high impedance over low? Personally, low > high IMO so I'd say you're good. I think the only high impedance injectors I'd try would be ID1000's or ID2000's. Local E85 guys love them. What's your duty cycle on the 160's?
Old 01-16-2011, 09:41 PM
  #52  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
krissoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bonne Terre, MO
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

awesome job. def have some nice #'s
Old 01-16-2011, 10:05 PM
  #53  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
tomz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saline, MI
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MaxxMitchell
I don't see it being real reliable at that power level. I pushed it pretty hard in the tune up to get there. Around 1k rwhp is a pretty decent tune up that I wouldn't hesitate seeing the car on most the time with the 347 or AES 390.
so how much timing did you have into it and peak power if you dont mined me asking
Old 01-17-2011, 02:18 AM
  #54  
Teching In
 
sultan hamdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 347 that could , congrats my frind
Old 01-17-2011, 03:30 AM
  #55  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Rickys S/C Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MOREHEAD KY
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn!
Old 01-17-2011, 04:44 AM
  #56  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
lt1773's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Aluminum block 5.7 L still has ability to cope with that much power lol..
Old 01-17-2011, 08:22 AM
  #57  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1fast bird
He mentioned they were AFR 225's
Wow I am blind! Thanks man.
Old 01-17-2011, 09:48 AM
  #58  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Shawnee KS
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 'Trust'
Would you have preferred high impedance over low? Personally, low > high IMO so I'd say you're good. I think the only high impedance injectors I'd try would be ID1000's or ID2000's. Local E85 guys love them. What's your duty cycle on the 160's?
The regulator was not increasing fuel pressure with boost and with a base pressure of 45 PSI we saw a pretty high IDC. I had the pressure turned down while I worked on getting the car to idle a bit leaner, and get light cruise afrs leaner as well, currently in the 12.0-12.5 range. Ill mess with the tune more in the next week.

As far as doing triple pumps in a plastic tank, its a PITA, I forgot to snag pictures of it.
Old 01-17-2011, 10:10 AM
  #59  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
MillerTime85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default


Last edited by MillerTime85; 01-17-2011 at 08:45 PM.
Old 01-17-2011, 10:39 AM
  #60  
TECH Regular
 
IDRIVEAG8GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Your GF's pants
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OMFG! I read used parts, stock stuff, and 1100RWHP in the same paragraph. WTF! Only in a Pontiac! Thanks for making my car look whimpy.


Quick Reply: 1142 rwhp 1147 rwtq budget 347 w/ GT-88



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.