Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Anyone using a single BW S369SXE ?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2016, 08:55 AM
  #41  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,150
Received 1,433 Likes on 903 Posts

Default

Given that Precision and Turbonetics are owned by the same company now, I suspect there will be quite a lot of overlap in design in their product lines.

Andrew
Old 12-14-2016, 11:18 AM
  #42  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

It will certainly be interesting to see if their lineups change or new models are introduced.

Turbonetics warranty on Precision units would be a good thing lol
Old 12-14-2016, 11:40 AM
  #43  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc
It's a hell of a lot better match than the tc76 junk everyone puts on
That's what I was thinking... 68/78mm vs a 73/80mm turbine. And the 69mm wheel is rated at 105 lb/min.


Originally Posted by hellbents10
I had a hard time with one over 550rwhp on a 5.3. It would not make more then 12psi or so.
Curious... doesn't really make sense. Wastegate pinned?


Originally Posted by oscs
Yeah not real sure how a SX369 can't make more than 550whp... I've had S366's do that and more.
Originally Posted by oscs
Exactly. If you can't make 550whp with a SX369 you're not doing it right.
That's what I'm thinking, guys easily make 1400+ with twin 369's on 408/416ci, how can it not make even 650 on a 325ci?


Originally Posted by DBRODS
I swapped from a pair of Turbonetics Tseries Billet 7568s with .81AR to the Borg SXE 369s with 73mm turbine and 88AR. Power was down 200hp and spool went to crap. The netics would be all in at 4600rpm and the borgs werent all in till 6200. I swapped cams and changed stators a few times. I finally put the Turbonetics back on and power/spool was back. I later swapped to a pair of precisions and picked up over the netics. You couldn't pay me to try any of the SXE369s ever again. Testing was done up to 26psi. This was all done about 10 months ago.

Originally Posted by DBRODS
Its in a 4200# truck, no track times on the new setup. Its not legal for the track. With the netics its been low 10s at 143mph on 15psi with traction issues.
So twin 7568's made 800whp at 15psi (judging weight vs trap), but you're saying 6973's couldn't make 600whp at any psi? Something seems amiss since others are making well north of 1200 on the 6973's at mid 20's boost.
Old 12-14-2016, 12:13 PM
  #44  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Don't remember the whole setup, maybe he had a small exh. housing. Switched to a good old S375 deal and picked up 12-13mph in a truck with the same wastegate spring though.
Old 12-14-2016, 03:09 PM
  #45  
On The Tree
 
94heritage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Over on performance trucks theres a guy that did a kb racing single kit with the 369 sxe and on 7 lbs of boost it did 470 to the tire. I would think it would be a kick *** instant power little turbo that could do north of 650 tire with the boost turned up.
Old 12-14-2016, 03:23 PM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have seen LiL John and Jose from forced inductions say that some of those new s300s are garbage. I think they said some of the exhaust wheels just don't work. Hopefully one of them will respond.
Old 12-14-2016, 03:27 PM
  #47  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,150
Received 1,433 Likes on 903 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 94heritage
Over on performance trucks theres a guy that did a kb racing single kit with the 369 sxe and on 7 lbs of boost it did 470 to the tire. I would think it would be a kick *** instant power little turbo that could do north of 650 tire with the boost turned up.
Old 12-14-2016, 03:48 PM
  #48  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,150
Received 1,433 Likes on 903 Posts

Default

Different truck, but same kit and turbo. Seems to boost very quickly.


Old 12-14-2016, 09:48 PM
  #49  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
DBRODS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
So twin 7568's made 800whp at 15psi (judging weight vs trap), but you're saying 6973's couldn't make 600whp at any psi? Something seems amiss since others are making well north of 1200 on the 6973's at mid 20's boost.
They made over 600. They were down almost 200hp compared to the Turbonetics 7568s at 26-28psi. Here are a few pics of why I'm positive they wont make the power. The compressor covers aern't machined enough to allow the volume of air needed. They will make the psi number but not move the volume. Here some pics from when I was playing musical turbos.












Old 12-14-2016, 09:58 PM
  #50  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
DBRODS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Also had a guy from Cali that experienced the same issues I did. He swapped from a pair of ON3 76mm that made 1180whp at 28psi. The SXE 369s with 73mm turbines wouldn't make more than 970whp at the same 28psi setting. He went back to the ON3s.
Old 12-14-2016, 10:07 PM
  #51  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,150
Received 1,433 Likes on 903 Posts

Default

I believe your experience. Can anyone provide a more technical answer? These look so promising on paper and I'm sure that BW doesn't pull compressor maps out of thin air, so they must flow. I was hoping to use one on a built 5.3L and run 20 psi, but now I'm having doubts.

Andrew
Old 12-14-2016, 10:13 PM
  #52  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,955
Received 729 Likes on 534 Posts

Default

Do you know what kind of pressure ratios you were running? Seems like the SXE line is designed to run at much higher ratios that the older line. Seems more suited to a small engine and a ton of pressure VS a large engine and a ton of Flow. They only flow 105lb/min at like 3:1 pressure ratios. Stick that turbo on a 2 liter and it will sing at 50 psi .
Old 12-14-2016, 10:30 PM
  #53  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
DBRODS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Do you know what kind of pressure ratios you were running? Seems like the SXE line is designed to run at much higher ratios that the older line. Seems more suited to a small engine and a ton of pressure VS a large engine and a ton of Flow. They only flow 105lb/min at like 3:1 pressure ratios. Stick that turbo on a 2 liter and it will sing at 50 psi .
The one thing I don't monitor is back pressure. I do know that the Turbonetics above 28psi would take 3-4more psi on the dome to make another 1psi of boost. The SXE 369s at 28psi where still at a 1psi on the dome made another 1psi of boost. The Precision 6766s are still at 1psi on the dome to make 1psi of boost at 34psi.
Old 12-15-2016, 03:22 AM
  #54  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Interesting stuff.

how deep/wide were the channel on each cover? BW do claim the sxe cover is a better than the older units. its hard to imagine them dropping a ball.

anyone have any details on Steve Morris provolute mods?
Old 12-15-2016, 06:26 AM
  #55  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
alocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Project GatTagO
I believe your experience. Can anyone provide a more technical answer? These look so promising on paper and I'm sure that BW doesn't pull compressor maps out of thin air, so they must flow. I was hoping to use one on a built 5.3L and run 20 psi, but now I'm having doubts.

Andrew
I agree, the maps look great but the pictures of the cover are interesting. The height in the gap is just as important as the width but it looks restrictive even compared to the standard S366. You would think the twin SXE's would at least make power.

Just for fun here is the spool characteristic of my 6.0 S475 compared to the truck above. I brake torqued it about the same amount of time and rolled into it.

Old 12-15-2016, 06:53 AM
  #56  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DBRODS
They made over 600. They were down almost 200hp compared to the Turbonetics 7568s at 26-28psi. Here are a few pics of why I'm positive they wont make the power. The compressor covers aern't machined enough to allow the volume of air needed. They will make the psi number but not move the volume. Here some pics from when I was playing musical turbos.
Gotcha that makes more sense. I think the 75mm compressors simply moved more air then a 69mm at 26-28psi but your 5.3 could still breath easily through two 68mm turbines and didn't realize the gain from going to a larger turbine?

I'm wondering if you kept turning up the boost what would happen? You ran 34psi with the Precisions why not the Borgs?
Old 12-15-2016, 06:55 AM
  #57  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,955
Received 729 Likes on 534 Posts

Default

Do the maps really look that great at the common pressure ratios used on LS engine in a twin config?
Attached Thumbnails Anyone using a single BW S369SXE ?!-69_compmap__.jpg  
Old 12-15-2016, 07:03 AM
  #58  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

The cover on my 364FMW, which even uses the smaller cover as per 362



I'm sure the compressor wheels themselves are very good...but perhaps it is the cover that is letting them down.

Steve Morris modifies Procharger volutes which is supposed to release a good bit of power, and from videos of the work it looks like the work is concentrated in the outer areas mentioned here.
Old 12-15-2016, 07:19 AM
  #59  
TECH Fanatic
 
svslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pittsboro, IN
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Do the maps really look that great at the common pressure ratios used on LS engine in a twin config?
This is likely the root of everyone's issues with them.
Old 12-15-2016, 08:17 AM
  #60  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,150
Received 1,433 Likes on 903 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Do the maps really look that great at the common pressure ratios used on LS engine in a twin config?
Im looking at using a single on a 5.3L and building a torque monster. What concerned me are statements claiming that these turbos don't work at higher boost levels.

Andrew


Quick Reply: Anyone using a single BW S369SXE ?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.