Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Air Filter for Turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2018, 03:48 PM
  #201  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
70c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default



Well guys I got a bigger filter on the turbo. I go back to the tuner next Friday. I'll do a run with the old filter and the new to see if there is any difference. Maybe ill do a pull with no filter as well.
Old 04-04-2018, 03:50 PM
  #202  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,600
Received 1,743 Likes on 1,301 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 70c10


Well guys I got a bigger filter on the turbo. I go back to the tuner next Friday. I'll do a run with the old filter and the new to see if there is any difference. Maybe ill do a pull with no filter as well.
Nice! If it's a restriction surely a 2-3x bigger filter should help.
Old 04-04-2018, 03:58 PM
  #203  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
70c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm wondering if I could potentially see more boost by switching out the bigger filter. I can tell you at idle my Wideband reads differently.
Old 04-04-2018, 04:06 PM
  #204  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

You could easily went for a much larger base to taper down, or one with an offset hole slightly and larger filter body.

Either way as long as that is a reputable brand it should be fine.

If your wideband is reading different at idle, whatever you had before must have been diabolically **** or the engine just needs tuned properly.
Old 04-04-2018, 04:08 PM
  #205  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 80/TA/LT1
Wow, I came here to see what filter I should run on my 7875. Unfortunately I read all ten pages hoping to find an answer. Now I have a belly ache in my head, and I am much dumber than I was before, fml......
it's incredibly simple.

Fit the biggest good quality filter you can in the space you have available.

As you can measure that, you are the best person to decide what fits.
Old 04-04-2018, 04:08 PM
  #206  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
roastin240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 70c10
Thats the most filters I have ever seen in 1 location under 1 hood
Old 04-04-2018, 04:14 PM
  #207  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
80/TA/LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 479
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

To the op what brand filter is that? Also, it appears you are running your catch can to the filter base. If so could you please post pics of how you tapped it into the filter, as well as the rest of your hose routing? Thx a lot
Old 04-04-2018, 04:20 PM
  #208  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
70c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
You could easily went for a much larger base to taper down, or one with an offset hole slightly and larger filter body.

Either way as long as that is a reputable brand it should be fine.

If your wideband is reading different at idle, whatever you had before must have been diabolically **** or the engine just needs tuned properly.
It is the AFE pro dry S. The picture is deceiving, there isn't as much room as it looks.
Old 04-04-2018, 04:27 PM
  #209  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Kyle.t91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Received 39 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

i know when i was running a small filter like you had on there i hurt boost by 3 or 4 lbs. it fell off one day and i didnt know it and the truck had waaayy more power. i have a larger filter on there now along with a 90 elbow off a cummins truck since the filter was too large to fit.
Old 04-08-2018, 09:50 PM
  #210  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

This guy picked up 60rwhp and 1.5psi on his blower by ditching the filter. I am not sure on the details of is filter setup.

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...=519233&page=3
Old 04-09-2018, 06:45 AM
  #211  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,600
Received 1,743 Likes on 1,301 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RealQuick
This guy picked up 60rwhp and 1.5psi on his blower by ditching the filter. I am not sure on the details of is filter setup.

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...=519233&page=3
Makes me feel slightly more sane that there are other examples of people pulling the filter and picking up power.
Old 04-09-2018, 10:52 AM
  #212  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...l#post19848560

19 PSI last weekend on a stock bottom end 5.3 on 93 octane no meth. Still running no issues and the plugs and oil look great. Been running over a year as a DAILY DRIVER.
Hey I love details. Lets play the details game. If you wish to discuss this at length I will show you exactly dyno graphs/video dyno runs of engines running 25psi on pump fuels. NP for a dyno pass on a cold engine.

I never said it was impossible to do 20 or 25psi on 93 octane. I run 2L and 3L all the time at 22psi on 93 for example.

I said it wouldn't last as a daily driver setting, for the simple reason that the number of watts produced is mathematically incompatible with gasoline at any reasonable compression ratio for a daily driver using stock engine components.

For example, take your 20psi on 93 setup and put it on a load dyno at WOT for 45 seconds, the way a boat would run, hold it at say 5k rpm for a minute or so. Can you guess what would happen? Without superior method of cooling (like H2O injection or water cooled exhaust manifolds) it will have a meltdown in short order due to the number of watts being produced at that power level.

Completely different thing, fooling around on the street, vs holding a steady state RPM with gasoline at 22psi for a minute straight.
Old 04-09-2018, 11:20 AM
  #213  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,600
Received 1,743 Likes on 1,301 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kingtal0n
Hey I love details. Lets play the details game. If you wish to discuss this at length I will show you exactly dyno graphs/video dyno runs of engines running 25psi on pump fuels. NP for a dyno pass on a cold engine.

I never said it was impossible to do 20 or 25psi on 93 octane. I run 2L and 3L all the time at 22psi on 93 for example.

I said it wouldn't last as a daily driver setting, for the simple reason that the number of watts produced is mathematically incompatible with gasoline at any reasonable compression ratio for a daily driver using stock engine components.

For example, take your 20psi on 93 setup and put it on a load dyno at WOT for 45 seconds, the way a boat would run, hold it at say 5k rpm for a minute or so. Can you guess what would happen? Without superior method of cooling (like H2O injection or water cooled exhaust manifolds) it will have a meltdown in short order due to the number of watts being produced at that power level.

Completely different thing, fooling around on the street, vs holding a steady state RPM with gasoline at 22psi for a minute straight.
Why are you referencing a boat when we're talking about a daily driver? Why are you referencing dyno pulls? More irrelevant info? Ok, got it. In case you have trouble following, we are talking about automobiles driven on the street as well as the drag strip, not boats and dyno queens. Your claim is that it will not last as a daily driver, except everyone in this thread has examples of them lasting. These are street cars driven hard regularly. My example is literally their only form of transportation. I'm sorry if this is difficult for you to grasp, but maybe you should change your tuning style, then you can do it to
Old 04-09-2018, 12:13 PM
  #214  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Its called safety factor. How do you know the driver isn't going to overwhelm the OEM systems? Lots of people buy brand new vette Z06's or whatever, take them to the track and still manage to break things and complain about it. Related to the output in Watts.

Drag racing passes are over and there is "cooldown" time necessary for many combinations, due to the number of Watts involved.

Even a factory engine at 0psi under the worst climate conditions, isn't that far from trouble. Stuff like a Low octane map exists for flexibility in these situations, even with just 0psi atmospheric pressure can be a challenge. This is because factory will raise compression ratio trying to conserve fuel against the nature of that fuel to cause damage when conditions are at their worst. Nevermind the 7psi or 9psi of boost you want to add on top of that worst possible condition that the unaware driver who's car you just tuned is doing to it (or 19psi, yeah right).


In any situation where there is X minutes or seconds to meltdown, then No steady state possible. Then this is TYPICAL of high power drag racing setup. You make a single "PASS" and then cooldown is a ROUTINE everyday common experience. A well known idea, nothing new here. Get it yet? The number of WATTS is very high, so the single "pass" becomes a thing, there is no steady state possible.

And that is absolutely fine for a daily driver, which is essentially a light to light drag race car combined with some manner of distance-ability, if you know what you are doing and how to avoid catastrophic situations.

But we are not in the business of driving people's cars after we tune them. We tune the car, then hand the driver the key and say "go for it". You hand that kind of power over to 200 or 500 random people and 1 of them or more is going to hold the pedal down in 5th or 6th gear for ten simultaneous highway drag races to 160mph in overdrive. Because why not? That is essentially what I like to do as well with my own daily, WOT on the highway then back to cruise speed then WOT again is the ultimate stress test for my car, do that for 400 miles, race every cloud in the sky I can see in Florida's daytime ambient. I could not imagine doing that with 19psi of boost on a stock 5.3L engine without water injection, sorry. I am sure it would happen a couple times, maybe even a couple months. But it would not be reliable.


I would never let that happen to somebody. So either I warn them explicitly about the dangers and possible ways to overcome potential over heating, make sure when I hand them the key that this is what you can do with the engine, and this is what you don't want to do with it unless you have to, and here are the precautions you will take if you wanted to, I will email you a list.
Old 04-09-2018, 12:51 PM
  #215  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,600
Received 1,743 Likes on 1,301 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kingtal0n
Its called safety factor. How do you know the driver isn't going to overwhelm the OEM systems? Lots of people buy brand new vette Z06's or whatever, take them to the track and still manage to break things and complain about it. Related to the output in Watts.

Drag racing passes are over and there is "cooldown" time necessary for many combinations, due to the number of Watts involved.

Even a factory engine at 0psi under the worst climate conditions, isn't that far from trouble. Stuff like a Low octane map exists for flexibility in these situations, even with just 0psi atmospheric pressure can be a challenge. This is because factory will raise compression ratio trying to conserve fuel against the nature of that fuel to cause damage when conditions are at their worst. Nevermind the 7psi or 9psi of boost you want to add on top of that worst possible condition that the unaware driver who's car you just tuned is doing to it (or 19psi, yeah right).


In any situation where there is X minutes or seconds to meltdown, then No steady state possible. Then this is TYPICAL of high power drag racing setup. You make a single "PASS" and then cooldown is a ROUTINE everyday common experience. A well known idea, nothing new here. Get it yet? The number of WATTS is very high, so the single "pass" becomes a thing, there is no steady state possible.

And that is absolutely fine for a daily driver, which is essentially a light to light drag race car combined with some manner of distance-ability, if you know what you are doing and how to avoid catastrophic situations.

But we are not in the business of driving people's cars after we tune them. We tune the car, then hand the driver the key and say "go for it". You hand that kind of power over to 200 or 500 random people and 1 of them or more is going to hold the pedal down in 5th or 6th gear for ten simultaneous highway drag races to 160mph in overdrive. Because why not? That is essentially what I like to do as well with my own daily, WOT on the highway then back to cruise speed then WOT again is the ultimate stress test for my car, do that for 400 miles, race every cloud in the sky I can see in Florida's daytime ambient. I could not imagine doing that with 19psi of boost on a stock 5.3L engine without water injection, sorry. I am sure it would happen a couple times, maybe even a couple months. But it would not be reliable.


I would never let that happen to somebody. So either I warn them explicitly about the dangers and possible ways to overcome potential over heating, make sure when I hand them the key that this is what you can do with the engine, and this is what you don't want to do with it unless you have to, and here are the precautions you will take if you wanted to, I will email you a list.
If a person builds a highly modded street car and decides they want to banzai the highway in 6th gear to 160 they're an idiot and I have no issues with it blowing up. Part of building/owning a vehicle like this is having some common sense, or learn the hard way. Glad to see you finally admit that a street car that drag races can survive and be reliable at those boost levels though. Thanks for finally admitting your other statements were misleading/wrong
Old 04-09-2018, 01:59 PM
  #216  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

There is no misleading statement, I merely review what I had already said.

Pls go find a single misleading statement I will gladly delete my account and never post again. Just find one. You are assuming things, again.
Old 04-09-2018, 02:04 PM
  #217  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Kyle.t91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 527
Received 39 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

this thread is super helpful
Old 04-09-2018, 02:06 PM
  #218  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,600
Received 1,743 Likes on 1,301 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kingtal0n
There is no misleading statement, I merely review what I had already said.

Pls go find a single misleading statement I will gladly delete my account and never post again. Just find one. You are assuming things, again.


Originally Posted by kingtal0n
There is nobody using 93 and 12+ psi of boost on any stock LS engine (for long) for a reason......
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...l#post19848560
I already did...post 195. Please delete your account now. Thanks.
Old 04-09-2018, 02:18 PM
  #219  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
LLLosingit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,837
Received 475 Likes on 354 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...l#post19848560
I already did...post 195. Please delete your account now. Thanks.
He won't he will continue to twist things to fit his agenda, His screen name should be thread killer!
Old 04-09-2018, 02:22 PM
  #220  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...l#post19848560
I already did...post 195. Please delete your account now. Thanks.
It says, accurately, for long. As in X minutes that we just talked about. You find me an engine that you can hold down the gas for that long (X minutes looking for a steady state) and it will explode. therefore, nobody will have it for that long (X minutes).

obviously if you build a daily driver, make one dyno pass at 600rwhp and 22psi, then let it sit in the garage for 10 years, you could say "I have a 600rwhp 93 octane 22psi car running fine for 10 years". The length of time in terms of ownership, or years is irrelivant. Knowing this, you must take another perspective.

Miles doesn't work for the same reason. I can drive it 9999999 miles using less than 20% throttle position after my 600rwhp dyno pass the same way I could park it in the garage.

So miles being irrelivant, we go to minutes of WOT.

How many minutes of WOT can it take? 1? 2? 5? You won't have it for long, it won't be very many minutes. There is no other way to describe the time frame for when it explodes than to point out the lack of steady state and how this leads to unreliability in the hands of noobs.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 AM.