8.8 vs 9" Parasitic Loss??
#5
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am in the same boat with this question. I am looking at buying a 12 bolt or a 9" really soon. Either one should fit my strength requirement just fine but at my current power levels I would like to keep the loss low. Is a 9" that much worse than any other rear?
Trending Topics
#10
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
The 8.8" is very similar in design to a 12-bolt, and from the link:
That is about as concrete of an answer as you'll find on the subject. Finding someone that has had both and took the time to do a before/after with the same gear ratios, etc. ain't gonna happen.
This strengthens the rearend assembly but at the cost of approximately 2 to 3 percent loss of power to drive the gears compared to a 12-bolt.
#12
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car craft ran the same car with a 12 bolt, dana 60 and then a 9" back to back on the dyno, the 9" came in with 7 less hp and 4 ft/lbs less torque than the 12 bolt. So if a 8.8 is less efficient than a 12 bolt, I imagine it's not much better than a 9".
Heres the link - http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...p/viewall.html
Heres the link - http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...p/viewall.html