What i noticed after switching from Patriot Stg2 to TF235 in my 408
#1
What i noticed after switching from Patriot Stg2 to TF235 in my 408
After i switched from Patriot stage 2 heads to Trickflow 235 with the same CC i noticed the following while tuning the car on street :
1- The MAP increased while idling by 4 kpa
2- The car need nearly 10% extra fuel in the top end due increase of air flow
3- The MAP now is reading 97 kpa @ WOT which mean my unported FAST90/90 setup is buttle nick now maybe its time to update to ported 102 setup
i hoop to have cash soon 1400$
4- Noticed 1.2 sec improve in acceleration from 60-125 MPH
5- The car is not accepting more than 26 degree of timing after 6000 RPM ( before was 28 )
still working on the tune and hoop to put it on dyno soon to see how much it will put
1- The MAP increased while idling by 4 kpa
2- The car need nearly 10% extra fuel in the top end due increase of air flow
3- The MAP now is reading 97 kpa @ WOT which mean my unported FAST90/90 setup is buttle nick now maybe its time to update to ported 102 setup
i hoop to have cash soon 1400$
4- Noticed 1.2 sec improve in acceleration from 60-125 MPH
5- The car is not accepting more than 26 degree of timing after 6000 RPM ( before was 28 )
still working on the tune and hoop to put it on dyno soon to see how much it will put
#4
After i switched from Patriot stage 2 heads to Trickflow 235 with the same CC i noticed the following while tuning the car on street :
1- The MAP increased while idling by 4 kpa
2- The car need nearly 10% extra fuel in the top end due increase of air flow
3- The MAP now is reading 97 kpa @ WOT which mean my unported FAST90/90 setup is buttle nick now maybe its time to update to ported 102 setup
i hoop to have cash soon 1400$
4- Noticed 1.2 sec improve in acceleration from 60-125 MPH
5- The car is not accepting more than 26 degree of timing after 6000 RPM ( before was 28 )
still working on the tune and hoop to put it on dyno soon to see how much it will put
1- The MAP increased while idling by 4 kpa
2- The car need nearly 10% extra fuel in the top end due increase of air flow
3- The MAP now is reading 97 kpa @ WOT which mean my unported FAST90/90 setup is buttle nick now maybe its time to update to ported 102 setup
i hoop to have cash soon 1400$
4- Noticed 1.2 sec improve in acceleration from 60-125 MPH
5- The car is not accepting more than 26 degree of timing after 6000 RPM ( before was 28 )
still working on the tune and hoop to put it on dyno soon to see how much it will put
Nothing here really surprises me....Any rwhp #'s and what tranny???
#5
Trending Topics
#8
when you say same CC, are you referring to combustion chamber cc?
if so, what would cause it to take less timing? i thought after market heads had better quench pads, and thus could take more timing at the same compression.
i have also heard that the increased airflow is requiring less timing to make the same combustion chamber pressure, and thus you can make more power with less timing on better heads.
im not too well schooled so i figured i would ask for some clarification
if so, what would cause it to take less timing? i thought after market heads had better quench pads, and thus could take more timing at the same compression.
i have also heard that the increased airflow is requiring less timing to make the same combustion chamber pressure, and thus you can make more power with less timing on better heads.
im not too well schooled so i figured i would ask for some clarification
#9
when you say same CC, are you referring to combustion chamber cc?
if so, what would cause it to take less timing? i thought after market heads had better quench pads, and thus could take more timing at the same compression.
i have also heard that the increased airflow is requiring less timing to make the same combustion chamber pressure, and thus you can make more power with less timing on better heads.
im not too well schooled so i figured i would ask for some clarification
if so, what would cause it to take less timing? i thought after market heads had better quench pads, and thus could take more timing at the same compression.
i have also heard that the increased airflow is requiring less timing to make the same combustion chamber pressure, and thus you can make more power with less timing on better heads.
im not too well schooled so i figured i would ask for some clarification
regarding timing maybe it need a real tuner to judge this point
it will be tuned by one reputable tuner maybe after one week and we will see
#10
I have the TFS 220's. Ryan said my car picked up nothing at 28* so he backed it down to 26* I have seen this on AFR heads too but the OEM cathedrals seem to make best power with a little more usually 28*...