Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

228/232 110 LSA or 227/233 110 LSA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2011 | 01:35 PM
  #1  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default 228/232 110 LSA or 227/233 110 LSA?

Stock headed 2002 Trans Am WS6, 6 speed, Stainless Works long tube headers, true dual exhaust, lid, LS6 intake.

Am I splitting hairs here or does the extra split of the 227/233 cam benefit the stock heads? Both cams have 10 degrees of overlap. Should there be any advance ground in or not. I want to be able to install the cam "dot to dot", so I wasn't sure if having advance ground in would allow for that or not. Shouldn't really need any or very little advance ground in due to the 110 LSA, right? Any help at all would be great. Thanks guys.
Old 06-17-2011 | 05:09 PM
  #2  
mark21742's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 4
From: PA/MD
Default

Most cams have 2-4 degrees of advance already ground in and can be installed dot to dot, is go for the larger split
Old 06-18-2011 | 01:59 AM
  #3  
99Bluz28's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 11
From: C. V., Kalifornia
Default

If high flow heads aren't in future plans for the car, then get the wider split.
IMO, 2* advance should be good.
Old 06-18-2011 | 02:56 AM
  #4  
98 StealthZ's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

I agree, if heads or head work isnt in the plans get the wider split...
Old 06-19-2011 | 11:59 PM
  #5  
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 15
From: Fredonia,WI
Default

Since your exhaust is really good I'd go 228/232 and don't focus too much
on the degrees of advance but rather the intake closing point. I believe the
sweet spot for the ls engine is 43-45 ABDC.
Old 06-22-2011 | 11:15 AM
  #6  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
If high flow heads aren't in future plans for the car, then get the wider split.
IMO, 2* advance should be good.
Yeah, heads are in the future. So you say go with 2* advance? What about lift? Probably right at or below .600 right?
Old 06-22-2011 | 12:36 PM
  #7  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by A.R. Shale Targa
Since your exhaust is really good I'd go 228/232 and don't focus too much
on the degrees of advance but rather the intake closing point. I believe the
sweet spot for the ls engine is 43-45 ABDC.
That is a more correct answer. Advance is chosen to fine tune the valve events. But part of the trick is to know the corrolation between IVC value, the rest of VEs and the powerband you're trying to produce.

For the 228/232 I like 110 LSA and 109 ICL, IVC 43, IVO/EVC are equidistant from TDC.

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; 06-22-2011 at 12:42 PM.
Old 06-22-2011 | 02:10 PM
  #8  
99Bluz28's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 11
From: C. V., Kalifornia
Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
Yeah, heads are in the future. So you say go with 2* advance? What about lift? Probably right at or below .600 right?
IMO, PREDATOR-Z has a very good understanding of what combinations work best. He did the custom specification for my current cam(227/231 111 lsa+2 with .614"/.617"lift on LSL lobes) and it has worked great!

I'd seriously consider any recommendation he give you.

Send him a pm if you want to go into a lot more detail on your cam specs.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.