New cams from Tick Performance
What kind of power do you think you could get out of a stock compression 5.3 with the SNS stage 1?
Any power goals with the towing series of cams you mentioned?
I have an 07 (smaller body), with the low compression 5.3, and have been looking at cams. I have 4:10's, built trans, 3200 stall, long tubes, and cal tracs on my truck right now. If you guys are able to come up with a cam to put a truck set up like that (on ET streets) into the 12's and 13 flat on hot days........you guys will be sitting on a gold mine.....as long as the heads stay on the truck, amd it's just a cam swap the average Joe like me will have an awesome set up that they can still use as pick up truck.
With guys going to the bigger 228/228 cams and up they loose the average TQ for more peak......and have to run larger stalls.....sometimes not an option for a few guys. Some guys spend so much cash on heads to bump the compression up that they might as well have put a 6.0L in it......so a cam thats affordable to toss in and make power for 12's on the stock heads would make a few people think twice about where they are spending thier money.......I dig the stock headed LS2 you posted up!
Do you guys think designing a truck specific cam that increases the dynamic compression would be able to make more average TQ than the two grinds we've been using?
Thanks for taking the time to answer everyone's questions! I dig the Military discount, and the way you mention it on your website......LOL.......you don't see too many people saying thank you anymore, let alone a discount with a smile......
Since the first person asked me about a truck line of camshafts, I've been using data from customers that have agreed to the testing for a new line of truck cams. I've tried single pattern camshafts, traditional split and even reverse grind camshafts to see which made more torque in each application. The results are interesting to say the least, but my N/A cams will still retain a traditional split design with their @.050" valve events.
Most want to tow with better fuel mileage and power, the other's want maximum E.T. and power for what they have. Expect three camshafts to add to the existing TorqueMax camshaft line, but for truck and SUV applications. I feel like I've gathered enough data from several customers to now complete a line of truck/suv torque minded camshafts.
Look for something soon on this.
Since the first person asked me about a truck line of camshafts, I've been using data from customers that have agreed to the testing for a new line of truck cams. I've tried single pattern camshafts, traditional split and even reverse grind camshafts to see which made more torque in each application. The results are interesting to say the least, but my N/A cams will still retain a traditional split design with their @.050" valve events.
Most want to tow with better fuel mileage and power, the other's want maximum E.T. and power for what they have. Expect three camshafts to add to the existing TorqueMax camshaft line, but for truck and SUV applications. I feel like I've gathered enough data from several customers to now complete a line of truck/suv torque minded camshafts.
Look for something soon on this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8My2CpUaWwQ
I cannot remember off the top of my head if the majority of those 5.3's were flat top piston motors or not.
How about down low? I'm glad you like it!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Be prepared to be heart broken by that dyno LOL!
p.s have yet to send my brothers info
p.s have yet to send my brothers info
.050"-.060" ideally. .080" is acceptable, but I shoot for .050"-.060" if possible.
I have a forged 347 with ls3 small bore (as cast, but milled .030) heads, ported ls3 intake, and ls7 Exhaust manifolds. The 231/239 cam in there feels a bit too big, it really has nothing below 4500.
This car is getting a blower eventually, but I will be running N/A for a while until I have the funds to do that right.
How do you think your stage 1 ls3 blower camshaft would work in my setup? The 222/240 version. That has negative overlap, which is something I am looking for. Not looking for maximum N/A power here, but something that will work well N/A but even better when the blower goes on.
On a side note, car ran in the best air yet, 1100', 1.60 60' and 11.76 at 113.9mph. (Street heat stage 2)
For next year I would like to see 11.7 in the heat, 11.50 in air like tonight.
Last edited by ironmanLS1; Sep 14, 2013 at 08:21 PM.
I have a forged 347 with ls3 small bore (as cast, but milled .030) heads, ported ls3 intake, and ls7 Exhaust manifolds. The 231/239 cam in there feels a bit too big, it really has nothing below 4500.
This car is getting a blower eventually, but I will be running N/A for a while until I have the funds to do that right.
How do you think your stage 1 ls3 blower camshaft would work in my setup? The 222/240 version. That has negative overlap, which is something I am looking for. Not looking for maximum N/A power here, but something that will work well N/A but even better when the blower goes on.
I would recommend my 223/234 .610"/.612" 111+4 camshaft I use in a lot of G8's and 5th Gen's for guys that want low end torque and a camshaft that still pulls to 6600rpm.
I think you will be much happier with the nearly 10 degrees less intake duration that my camshaft has over your current camshaft. What is the current ICL of your 231/239 camshaft?
Compare it to my 222/234 on a 107icl which gives us a 38.5@.050" ABDC closing event. I would be willing to bet your intake closing event is nearly 6-8 degrees later than mine. With a long runner OEM style intake, the torque difference could be very large.
Cylinder pressure is your friend when it comes to making torque.
On a side note, car ran in the best air yet, 1100', 1.60 60' and 11.76 at 113.9mph. (Street heat stage 2)
For next year I would like to see 11.7 in the heat, 11.50 in air like tonight.
That E.T. is very nice though! You've done a great job chipping away at it and a 11.7 for a street driven car is very impressive! If we could get you a 115-117mph trap speed you'd be in the 11.4's easily.
I would recommend my 223/234 .610"/.612" 111+4 camshaft I use in a lot of G8's and 5th Gen's for guys that want low end torque and a camshaft that still pulls to 6600rpm.
I think you will be much happier with the nearly 10 degrees less intake duration that my camshaft has over your current camshaft. What is the current ICL of your 231/239 camshaft?
Compare it to my 222/234 on a 107icl which gives us a 38.5@.050" ABDC closing event. I would be willing to bet your intake closing event is nearly 6-8 degrees later than mine. With a long runner OEM style intake, the torque difference could be very large.
Cylinder pressure is your friend when it comes to making torque.



