Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ATI Damper benefit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2015, 09:33 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
crash41301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 160
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default ATI Damper benefit?

I see lots of builds with aftermarket dampers on the engine. I'm curious, what benefits could I expect to see if I purchased a stock sized ATI damper for my LS1? It is a mass reduction and thus similar to a light flywheel?

I'm tempted to buy one because "its pretty" and "everyone else has one" but in my mind that's kind of not a good use of money, so trying to figure out "why does everyone seem to have one" ?
Old 10-31-2015, 09:36 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

It's an actual dampener unlike most under drive pulleys. Better for the longevity of your motor.
Old 10-31-2015, 09:59 PM
  #3  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes on 1,146 Posts
Default

I found the ATI did a better job damping vibrations than the stock damper
Old 11-01-2015, 12:15 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
crash41301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 160
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
I found the ATI did a better job damping vibrations than the stock damper
Can you quantify how you can tell that? I read that in their marketing speak but dont fully realize what that might mean short of "well it sounds better for the internals and everything else, but Ive no idea how Id know if its true or not"
Old 11-01-2015, 02:05 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (10)
 
lilaaron233333's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: West Covina CA
Posts: 95
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't put my thoughts of one in text for you but ATI dampers are the ****. Just get one lol

Last edited by lilaaron233333; 11-01-2015 at 02:07 AM. Reason: .
Old 11-01-2015, 07:54 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

You notice the smoother revs for sure. I always use ATI now. ATI or stay stock, imo.
Old 11-01-2015, 09:29 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The balancer absorbs harmonic vibrations reducing stresses just about everywhere in the engine. On the low end there is little benefit but the higher the RPM the more beneficial it becomes.

Innovators West makes a great piece as well. I've had both and would use either one.

Still bugs me that CCW stopped making their wheels with the much better coatings like the ones in your pic. I've got the SP500's and I'm thinking about stripping them and going polished.
Old 11-01-2015, 09:52 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default ATI Damper benefit?

The ATI superdamper tunes the crankshaft's torsional resonant frequency to well past 7500 rpm.

The stock damper tunes it to barely past 5000 rpm.

The stock damper also is prone to come apart with repeated high rpm usage.

The ATI damper cannot come apart unless you unbolt its screws.
Old 11-01-2015, 09:57 AM
  #9  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes on 1,146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by crash41301
Can you quantify how you can tell that? I read that in their marketing speak but dont fully realize what that might mean short of "well it sounds better for the internals and everything else, but Ive no idea how Id know if its true or not"
This is the best I can do. I had the wrong ATI damper when I first built, so I had to use the stock damper. Then I got the right ATI damper and installed it. I noticed fewer vibrations in the cabin and I heard less metallic rattle noises on cold start. So it's a pretty direct comparison before and after. At higher RPM, definitely smoother spinning
Old 11-01-2015, 12:16 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exidous
The balancer absorbs harmonic vibrations reducing stresses just about everywhere in the engine. On the low end there is little benefit but the higher the RPM the more beneficial it becomes.

Innovators West makes a great piece as well. I've had both and would use either one.

Still bugs me that CCW stopped making their wheels with the much better coatings like the ones in your pic. I've got the SP500's and I'm thinking about stripping them and going polished.
Originally Posted by joecar
The ATI superdamper tunes the crankshaft's torsional resonant frequency to well past 7500 rpm.

The stock damper tunes it to barely past 5000 rpm.

The stock damper also is prone to come apart with repeated high rpm usage.

The ATI damper cannot come apart unless you unbolt its screws.
Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
This is the best I can do. I had the wrong ATI damper when I first built, so I had to use the stock damper. Then I got the right ATI damper and installed it. I noticed fewer vibrations in the cabin and I heard less metallic rattle noises on cold start. So it's a pretty direct comparison before and after. At higher RPM, definitely smoother spinning
ALL very true.
I can tell you from tearing apart roundy round engines every winter that the fellas who purchase quality harmonic balancers will have bearings that look new and are often re usable for another season or two.
Higher order harmonics from elevated rpms are really kept in check and the torsional distortion that a crankshaft casting/forging sees is dramatically reduced.
Old 11-01-2015, 12:22 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
BOLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mundelein,Illinois
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If your car is stock and a daily driver, you're find with the stock balancer. If not, get an ATI damper.
Old 11-01-2015, 05:36 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
93Z2871805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Here are a few reasons why people have them:

http://www.onallcylinders.com/2014/0...monic-dampers/
Old 11-01-2015, 08:36 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I think all engines, even stock daily drivers, can benefit from a better damper.
Old 11-02-2015, 05:38 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
99 ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Desmoines iowa
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I was told it won't do much with out cam ?
Old 11-02-2015, 06:38 PM
  #15  
gpr
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
gpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 93Z2871805
Here are a few reasons why people have them:

http://www.onallcylinders.com/2014/0...monic-dampers/
That is an interesting read. It sounds like they tested specifically on an LS engine, and unless you rev your engine over 6500rpm that all the dampeners allowed for a maximum of .6 degrees of crank flex.
Old 11-02-2015, 08:46 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default ATI Damper benefit?

Originally Posted by 99 ss
I was told it won't do much with out cam ?
The crank still winds/unwinds regardless of the cam.
Old 11-02-2015, 08:52 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default ATI Damper benefit?

Originally Posted by gpr
... and unless you rev your engine over 6500rpm that all the dampeners allowed for a maximum of .6 degrees of crank flex.
They did not "allow for" upto 0.6* of flex, they *limited* the flex to 0.6* or less.

...

From 3,112 to approximately 6,500 rpm, all of the dampers limited crankshaft twist to no more than 0.6 degrees. Above 6,500 rpm, things got interesting. Crankshaft twist increased by a considerable margin with three of the dampers. At 7,893 rpm, one damper allowed a considerable 2.0 degrees of crank twist. The second had 1.7 degrees of twist, and the third had approximately 1.25 degrees of twist. The last damper—made by ATI—allowed just 0.28 degrees of crankshaft twist.

...



Quick Reply: ATI Damper benefit?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.