NA C6z Build
#481
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
I was able to get some data last night. On the fence with the results.
As far as the fueling numbers go, it continued to pull about 3% after 7400rpms up to 87-8800.
100-130 dragy numbers where pretty much the same as the previous setup with the high ram. Thats about 6400 to 8700rpm.
Mid-range is still crazy strong.
I have some theories on why the results are the way they are. But the only way to know for sure is to put it on a dyno.
As far as the fueling numbers go, it continued to pull about 3% after 7400rpms up to 87-8800.
100-130 dragy numbers where pretty much the same as the previous setup with the high ram. Thats about 6400 to 8700rpm.
Mid-range is still crazy strong.
I have some theories on why the results are the way they are. But the only way to know for sure is to put it on a dyno.
Andrew
The following users liked this post:
jayyyw (03-10-2024)
#482
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
It’s certainly possible. Only way to know for certain is to try.
#483
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
The car will perform different when you put a hood on it. Those exposed TB’s at high speed see turbulence and act funny. Air will totally act different at the TB entrance when you get a hood on it and will affect performance for the better at speed.
Edit….There’s basically a vacuum effect happening at high speed over the TB’s…opposite of what you want.
Edit….There’s basically a vacuum effect happening at high speed over the TB’s…opposite of what you want.
Last edited by Che70velle; 03-10-2024 at 09:53 PM.
#485
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
The hi ram was being fed by a giant front duct right? Ram air vs open TBs perpendicular to airflow.
Results after the hood will be interesting, but until you feed it sealed air I'm not sure you'll get your fuel numbers back.
Do you have a MAP sensor in the intake? Were they reading any differently at speed?
I think the highway is your best dyno tbh you're dealing with some very dynamic conditions like Chevelle pointed out - you have acceleration #'s and fuel flow numbers. Assuming weather conditions aren't drastically different you should have a pretty good sense what is happening.
Results after the hood will be interesting, but until you feed it sealed air I'm not sure you'll get your fuel numbers back.
Do you have a MAP sensor in the intake? Were they reading any differently at speed?
I think the highway is your best dyno tbh you're dealing with some very dynamic conditions like Chevelle pointed out - you have acceleration #'s and fuel flow numbers. Assuming weather conditions aren't drastically different you should have a pretty good sense what is happening.
#486
TECH Enthusiast
The car will perform different when you put a hood on it. Those exposed TB’s at high speed see turbulence and act funny. Air will totally act different at the TB entrance when you get a hood on it and will affect performance for the better at speed.
Edit….There’s basically a vacuum effect happening at high speed over the TB’s…opposite of what you want.
Edit….There’s basically a vacuum effect happening at high speed over the TB’s…opposite of what you want.
You could try a forward facing hat or maybe a large filter element that covers both TBs. I could see how an air filter element slowing down the air could possibly help it transition down into the manifold. Maybe even block off the back side of the filter (the part closest to the driver) so that the area of low pressure from the drag it creates can't suck any air away from the engine.
The following users liked this post:
jayyyw (03-13-2024)
#488
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
The hi ram was being fed by a giant front duct right? Ram air vs open TBs perpendicular to airflow.
Results after the hood will be interesting, but until you feed it sealed air I'm not sure you'll get your fuel numbers back.
Do you have a MAP sensor in the intake? Were they reading any differently at speed?
I think the highway is your best dyno tbh you're dealing with some very dynamic conditions like Chevelle pointed out - you have acceleration #'s and fuel flow numbers. Assuming weather conditions aren't drastically different you should have a pretty good sense what is happening.
Results after the hood will be interesting, but until you feed it sealed air I'm not sure you'll get your fuel numbers back.
Do you have a MAP sensor in the intake? Were they reading any differently at speed?
I think the highway is your best dyno tbh you're dealing with some very dynamic conditions like Chevelle pointed out - you have acceleration #'s and fuel flow numbers. Assuming weather conditions aren't drastically different you should have a pretty good sense what is happening.
Temperature was roughly the same. In the mid to upper 40s. Not on the same road, tho.
Hoping to get it on the dyno soon. I also removed all the spacers to see if that makes any kind of change.
#489
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
The following users liked this post:
DualQuadDave (03-13-2024)
#490
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Yes, there is a map sensor in the intake. It's at the very back and very bottom. The hi ram was a few inches higher, at the back of the manifold, as well. I was seeing 98-99kpa, compared to about 101-102kpa with the hi ram.
Temperature was roughly the same. In the mid to upper 40s. Not on the same road, tho.
Hoping to get it on the dyno soon. I also removed all the spacers to see if that makes any kind of change.
Temperature was roughly the same. In the mid to upper 40s. Not on the same road, tho.
Hoping to get it on the dyno soon. I also removed all the spacers to see if that makes any kind of change.
Andrew
The following users liked this post:
jayyyw (03-13-2024)
#491
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
I believe that's one of the parameters Holley logs? I can compare in the morning.
The following users liked this post:
jayyyw (03-13-2024)
#493
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Baro the other night was 100-101kpa and MAP was 98-99kpa
The following 2 users liked this post by jayyyw:
Project GatTagO (03-14-2024), spanks13 (03-14-2024)
The following users liked this post:
jayyyw (03-14-2024)
#496
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
More testing is needed to find the right combination that will allow this intake to shine. I like it, either way. It's definitely going to stay.
options I am looking at:
Once I get the new hood, something like this
big air cleaner assembly
or getting a new, stock hood and making a cleaner cut, then getting a lexan "mailbox" and attach it to the stock hood
or just go with how I was planning to feed the TBs with the previous air intake under the new hood
options I am looking at:
Once I get the new hood, something like this
big air cleaner assembly
or getting a new, stock hood and making a cleaner cut, then getting a lexan "mailbox" and attach it to the stock hood
or just go with how I was planning to feed the TBs with the previous air intake under the new hood
The following 3 users liked this post by jayyyw:
#498
I'd go mailbox with something that could be block off the opening when you're not around.
You don't want someone who is jealous of your car to drop something into the intake.
You don't want someone who is jealous of your car to drop something into the intake.
#499
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Yup, that's one thing that worries me. Lots of people that don't know how to not touch things that are not theirs.
The following 4 users liked this post by jayyyw:
#500
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
If your just driving the car on weekends or even less, I wouldn’t worry about the filters. Put a hood on the car that covers the TB’s by a couple inches if possible, and enjoy it. As you stated in a previous post, don’t drive in the desert and your golden. It’s not the type of build that your expecting to go 250k miles. It’s a race build that’s street driven, so rebuilds are on the maintenance list for sure. Plus you’ll make a few more ponies without filters. Now…if your gonna build something to direct air toward the TB’s, then you’ll want filters, but that’s different.
The following 3 users liked this post by Che70velle: