Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

What Would it takefor a 650rwhp LSX Motor>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2007, 08:47 PM
  #1  
dug
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default What Would it takefor a 650rwhp LSX Motor>

Im thinking 4.2" bore with 4.5" stroke would be a good foundation. 498 cubes. Then what?
Old 10-14-2007, 08:55 PM
  #2  
dug
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

how about a enough hp for stab n steer to 9 seconds? all motor no bottle
'
'
'
Old 10-14-2007, 09:46 PM
  #3  
dug
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

650rwhp through an unlocked auto
Old 10-14-2007, 09:50 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dug
Im thinking 4.2" bore with 4.5" stroke would be a good foundation. 498 cubes. Then what?
4.185 bore x 4.125 stroke....454ci

Canted Valve ETP heads and a sheet metal intake, with 11.3:1 cr and .650 lift cam.

There's your 650 RWHP with an A4 and a daily driver.

You ain't gonna do it with LS7 heads and intake and on pump gas.

Doing a 498ci would be foolish IMO, it'll be a ticking time bomb living on the edge and leave no room for a rebuild.

****Is that the banjo player from Deliverance in you avatar?****


.
Old 10-14-2007, 09:55 PM
  #5  
dug
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There's your 650 RWHP with an A4 and a daily driver.

you make it sound like an insignificant accomplishment.
Old 10-14-2007, 09:56 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Mr.MartyStone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Screwston, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't think he mentioned anything about pump gas. Call a reputable builder and discuss your goals, I'm sure they can get a lot closer than this message board can.
Old 10-14-2007, 09:58 PM
  #7  
dug
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I know, I know. 500rwhp is a realistic goal for a 402. THink whats possible with a 480+ cube lsx
Old 10-14-2007, 09:59 PM
  #8  
dug
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

600rwhp would be awesome. no turbo lag or nothing. just stomp on the gas.
Old 10-14-2007, 10:06 PM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dug

you make it sound like an insignificant accomplishment.
Really?

You asked, I told you. Who cares how significant it is or isn't.


.
Old 10-14-2007, 10:08 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.MartyStone
I don't think he mentioned anything about pump gas.
No, but I did.

650 RWHP could be possible with LS7 stuff, but not on pump gas and with a helluva cam.
Old 10-14-2007, 10:10 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dug
600rwhp would be awesome. no turbo lag or nothing. just stomp on the gas.
I'm selling my short deck LSX and waiting for the tall deck so I can have my builder to a 481ci. 650 RWHP is gonna be a breeze. I'd have a 650 RWHP 454ci LSX in my car already but I think it'll be worth the wait for the tall deck.


.
Old 10-14-2007, 10:12 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
ls1muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Shouldnt be much longer till that is the norm with 454's. The beginning phases are at 600-625 rwhp.
Old 10-14-2007, 11:33 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm shooting for 650 with ported ls7 heads and intake on a 454ci lsx. Cam is going to be a monster though probably in the high .600's on the lift. There's 620's comming from a 454 already on pump gas with a mild cam... and that's with gen III technology topend. I'll be at 12.5:1 running 100. I dont see 650 through the tires being unobtainable.
Old 10-14-2007, 11:46 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
I'm selling my short deck LSX and waiting for the tall deck so I can have my builder to a 481ci. 650 RWHP is gonna be a breeze. I'd have a 650 RWHP 454ci LSX in my car already but I think it'll be worth the wait for the tall deck.


.

I'll believe it when I see it.

You change your mind more then your underwear, lol.. and I quote

"I'm from the Lauderdale area too, I'll have a 454 TT on the road before years end. NRE will be building the entire car. It will be huge.

Of course its worth it"

That was less then two months ago, Quicken! So what's it gonna be? 454 TT, 454 high compression, big cam, or 481 tall deck lsx? haha. =p

Last edited by jermzz; 10-15-2007 at 09:12 AM.
Old 10-15-2007, 02:07 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by jermzz
I'll believe it when I see it.

You change your mind more then your underwear.. and I quote

"I'm from the Lauderdale area too, I'll have a 454 TT on the road before years end. NRE will be building the entire car. It will be huge.

Of course its worth it"

That was less then two months ago, Quicken!
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Old 10-15-2007, 02:08 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by dug
Im thinking 4.2" bore with 4.5" stroke would be a good foundation. 498 cubes. Then what?
dont forget about cash-
Old 10-15-2007, 05:17 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by jermzz
I'm shooting for 650 with ported ls7 heads and intake on a 454ci lsx. Cam is going to be a monster though probably in the high .600's on the lift. There's 620's comming from a 454 already on pump gas with a mild cam... and that's with gen III technology topend. I'll be at 12.5:1 running 100. I dont see 650 through the tires being unobtainable.
That 454 from LMR that did 620's had far from a mild cam. Intake lobe on that thing was in the 250's and the exhaust was even bigger. That is BIG. The one from Vengeance was even bigger....
Old 10-15-2007, 08:42 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
That 454 from LMR that did 620's had far from a mild cam. Intake lobe on that thing was in the 250's and the exhaust was even bigger. That is BIG. The one from Vengeance was even bigger....
It's big for a 408, 418, and maybe even a 427 running a gen III head. I'm sure there will be bigger with the 45x + ci engines. I never saw the ACTUAL specs of the cam, but you're right I suppose, it's not exactly small being 25x / 26x. Those TSP heads are flowing high CFM at very high lifts though .650 - .700.

The key always seemed to be a smaller cam with the cathedral port gen III heads, but ls7's use the traditional rectangualr port design. I'm looking forward to seeing how big the cams will end up being on these 45x + ci engines, especially when the tall deck LSX comes out soon.

I know there's gonna be problems running cams this big. They're already having to modify the lifter trays for high lift cams. I know one already came apart from the lifter getting too high in the tray.
Old 10-15-2007, 09:32 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by jermzz
It's big for a 408, 418, and maybe even a 427 running a gen III head. I'm sure there will be bigger with the 45x + ci engines. I never saw the ACTUAL specs of the cam, but you're right I suppose, it's not exactly small being 25x / 26x. Those TSP heads are flowing high CFM at very high lifts though .650 - .700.

The key always seemed to be a smaller cam with the cathedral port gen III heads, but ls7's use the traditional rectangualr port design. I'm looking forward to seeing how big the cams will end up being on these 45x + ci engines, especially when the tall deck LSX comes out soon.

I know there's gonna be problems running cams this big. They're already having to modify the lifter trays for high lift cams. I know one already came apart from the lifter getting too high in the tray.

The thing is with the ls7 type heads, I do not believe there is much reason to go to the huge cams like the gen3 stuff. The heads move enough air that you don't need the crazy huge intake lobe to fill the chamber. I believe in the case of the ls7 heads that less may truly be more.

I know a .38 in the heart is more effective than a .44 in the leg
Old 10-15-2007, 11:48 AM
  #20  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
IFRYRCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
The thing is with the ls7 type heads, I do not believe there is much reason to go to the huge cams like the gen3 stuff. The heads move enough air that you don't need the crazy huge intake lobe to fill the chamber. I believe in the case of the ls7 heads that less may truly be more.

I know a .38 in the heart is more effective than a .44 in the leg
Yeah, but as long as the bigger cams continue to make more power than the smaller ones, people will run them. If we're eventually doing 650RW with a mild cam, somebody will want 700RW with a crazy grind. A .38 to the heart will beat a .44 to the leg, but a .44 to the head will get the job done every time!

The other thing to consider with these new heads is the huge splits in duration in favor of the exhaust side. That's a whole new thing. With the GenIII stuff, some people split their cam grinds, but I've got a feeling that with the new GenIV stuff, EVERYONE will.


Quick Reply: What Would it takefor a 650rwhp LSX Motor>



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.