Manual Transmission T56 | T5 | MN12 | Clutches | Hydraulics | Shifters
View Poll Results: Mcleod or Quick Time Bell Housing
Mcleod
15
38.46%
Quick Time
24
61.54%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

POLL:Mcleod or Quick Time Bell Housing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 01:53 PM
  #1  
CaMaRo67RS355's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (75)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 0
From: Rock Hill, South Carolina
Exclamation POLL:Mcleod or Quick Time Bell Housing

thanks for the help guys i received my quick time yesterday now i just gotta find the time to install it and my spec 3+ and billet steel flywheel, new gm slave, tick master, and arp hardware

Last edited by CaMaRo67RS355; Feb 14, 2009 at 11:41 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #2  
Gen414's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 0
From: Pearland, TX
Default

I picked up teh Mcleod SFI Modular bell from a member here, LOVE it. Fitment is spot on, thick, but not too heavy, and quality machining. I like it
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #3  
VIPRETR2's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Default

McLeod beacuase it has a motor plate to protect the engine.

Larry
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #4  
BADD SS's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 1
From: Baldwin, NY
Default

Just ordered a quick time, it is ALOT lighter.... There were troubles with both, on had holes in the wrong place (QT) and the other had several fitment issue's(Mcleod) I figure if both had, have, or may have problems, being it's a drag car im going for the lightest one...
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 06:24 PM
  #5  
quiet_storm98's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 20
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by VIPRETR2
McLeod beacuase it has a motor plate to protect the engine.

Larry
so the quicktime one doesn't?? If not then i may get a mcleod
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 06:27 PM
  #6  
LS199CAMAROZ28's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Va
Default

Originally Posted by VIPRETR2
McLeod beacuase it has a motor plate to protect the engine.

Larry
Quick Time also has a steel motor plate.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #7  
VIPRETR2's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LS199CAMAROZ28
Quick Time also has a steel motor plate.
I know they originally came with an aluminum plate and the current steel plate looks to be just a spacer that provides no protection whatsoever.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/10918937-post10.html

I could be wrong though.

Larry
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #8  
LSGunZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Now tell me this, which unit is lighter?

also how much weight is this going to add? I will have to purchase one of these as well and I have to see what I can do, to take weight off, if this adds weight...
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #9  
RAMPANT's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 27
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by LSGunZ28
Now tell me this, which unit is lighter?

also how much weight is this going to add? I will have to purchase one of these as well and I have to see what I can do, to take weight off, if this adds weight...

The QT is 13lbs lighter I had both here and weighed them back to back. If memory serve me correct the QT was 27 lbs with the aluminum front plate.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 06:59 PM
  #10  
CaMaRo67RS355's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (75)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 0
From: Rock Hill, South Carolina
Default

come on guys just vote
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 08:04 PM
  #11  
LSGunZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by RAMPANT
The QT is 13lbs lighter I had both here and weighed them back to back. If memory serve me correct the QT was 27 lbs with the aluminum front plate.
Thats decent, I wonder how much stock weighs

and both are SFI certified Bellhousings, right?

Im planning on running under 10.99s in the 1/4...
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 09:56 PM
  #12  
LSGunZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by CaMaRo67RS355
come on guys just vote
I wont vote yet, because I too am looking for one, and dont know which one is better... But since Quick time is lighter, that would get my vote..
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 11:56 PM
  #13  
CaMaRo67RS355's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (75)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 0
From: Rock Hill, South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by LSGunZ28
I wont vote yet, because I too am looking for one, and dont know which one is better... But since Quick time is lighter, that would get my vote..
in my research so far thats true but the plates that guard the back of the engine with the mcleod it is steel and the quicktime aluminum. steel wont give and aluminum will with ease plus the aluminum plate is thin and the mcleod steel is pretty thick.

now with that all im wondering is how will both protect if something goes wrong...
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 10:48 PM
  #14  
LSGunZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by CaMaRo67RS355
in my research so far thats true but the plates that guard the back of the engine with the mcleod it is steel and the quicktime aluminum. steel wont give and aluminum will with ease plus the aluminum plate is thin and the mcleod steel is pretty thick.

now with that all im wondering is how will both protect if something goes wrong...
Although I have a brand new motor, its sad to say. I dont think its worth the extra weight to ave the motor, if my flywheel were to somehow damage it...

But if this, too is referring to saving my legs, then it would be worth it...

But I think this part is for the engine..

Why couldnt they use Titanium for weight savings and strength?!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #15  
BADD SS's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 1
From: Baldwin, NY
Default

Originally Posted by LSGunZ28
Although I have a brand new motor, its sad to say. I dont think its worth the extra weight to ave the motor, if my flywheel were to somehow damage it...

But if this, too is referring to saving my legs, then it would be worth it...

But I think this part is for the engine..

Why couldnt they use Titanium for weight savings and strength?!
Cost, a 12"x 12" piece of .090 titanium is about $100
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #16  
WS6TransAm01's Avatar
CARTEK Racing
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Default

I have the Quick Time one, fit w/o a problem.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #17  
chi3f's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

i went with the quick time. Both are sfi rated, quick time is lighter, and it seems like all the McLeod's had fitment issues. As far as the motor plate, i'm not saying it doesn't matter to me but the big reason to have a sfi approved bellhousing is personal protection. The motor getting trashed wouldn't make me happy, but i would take that over personal damage.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #18  
LSGunZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by chi3f
i went with the quick time. Both are sfi rated, quick time is lighter, and it seems like all the McLeod's had fitment issues. As far as the motor plate, i'm not saying it doesn't matter to me but the big reason to have a sfi approved bellhousing is personal protection. The motor getting trashed wouldn't make me happy, but i would take that over personal damage.
seriously...

I may go with the quicktime, when I go ahead and get my clutch, and even better that its not gonna have fitment issues..
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:50 PM
  #19  
LSGunZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BADD SS
Cost, a 12"x 12" piece of .090 titanium is about $100
and well worth it, IMO besides theyre gonna use a longer, but thinner piece to go around... its worth it, if its $100 more for weight savings
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #20  
BADD SS's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 1
From: Baldwin, NY
Default

Originally Posted by LSGunZ28
and well worth it, IMO besides theyre gonna use a longer, but thinner piece to go around... its worth it, if its $100 more for weight savings
Well, it would require more than that, and titanium isnt as strong as you think, its strong and light, but there are steels much stronger... at the same thickness, just alot heavier...IMO, it would take at Least a $150-175 piece to cover it.. As mentioned before, I could care less about the motor, as long as my feet are still there if the clutch lets go....
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.