Road Racing Road Course | Autocross

Cam and gears question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2006, 10:06 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Castrellon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Cam and gears question

Got a 2001 Z06. Weaker 385 horse vs the 405 and now 505 hp versions.
Want to up grade a cam and gears to match it. What'd y'all recomend.
I did some drag racing before. I know it doesn't take that much RPM or peaky numbers to corner. Back in the days with a street/strip car on a three-fitty, we'd run a 292/306 .488/.510 on a 114 with 4.10's out back with a 28" inch tall tire on the street and 26" slicks on the track.
I'm new to this cornering thing. Help a humble newbie out please. Love to talk theory and then practice it. Want to get into SCCA or other type of road corse racing.
I'm a heavy duty mechanic, so I plan on doing all the work myself. Already have a OZ 700 clutch going in. Going with the billit steel flywheel. Was thinking about some 3.73's or 3.90's. Got Pirelli P Zero's at all four corners.
Found this at LGM
G2 224 224 .580 .580 114
G5 224 230 .581 .572 114
MTI
C2 224 224 .581 .581 112
G1 228 232 .588 .575 113
X1 230 227 .591 .571 112
R1 232 236 .575 .578 114
Z1 236 236 .585 .585 112
Figured that last one is getting up there in lift. Wanted to stay bellow .600". Still going to run double springs and shaft mounted roller fullcrum rockers. Do they make guide plates for these motors? I remember on the old ones they had RPM stablitty kits that had guide plates and other tricks.

Last edited by Castrellon; 11-28-2006 at 10:29 PM.
Old 12-03-2006, 12:10 AM
  #2  
Teching In
iTrader: (14)
 
roadracetransam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Castrellon
Got a 2001 Z06. Weaker 385 horse vs the 405 and now 505 hp versions.
Want to up grade a cam and gears to match it. What'd y'all recomend.
I did some drag racing before. I know it doesn't take that much RPM or peaky numbers to corner. Back in the days with a street/strip car on a three-fitty, we'd run a 292/306 .488/.510 on a 114 with 4.10's out back with a 28" inch tall tire on the street and 26" slicks on the track.
I'm new to this cornering thing. Help a humble newbie out please. Love to talk theory and then practice it. Want to get into SCCA or other type of road corse racing.
I'm a heavy duty mechanic, so I plan on doing all the work myself. Already have a OZ 700 clutch going in. Going with the billit steel flywheel. Was thinking about some 3.73's or 3.90's. Got Pirelli P Zero's at all four corners.
Found this at LGM
G2 224 224 .580 .580 114
G5 224 230 .581 .572 114
MTI
C2 224 224 .581 .581 112
G1 228 232 .588 .575 113
X1 230 227 .591 .571 112
R1 232 236 .575 .578 114
Z1 236 236 .585 .585 112
Figured that last one is getting up there in lift. Wanted to stay bellow .600". Still going to run double springs and shaft mounted roller fullcrum rockers. Do they make guide plates for these motors? I remember on the old ones they had RPM stablitty kits that had guide plates and other tricks.
I can't help on the cam selection Q, but about road racing, I would make it out to a track before changing the car around. Your current motor might suprise you! Anyway getting started in RR the bigest improvement you will make will be from working on the driver. Also look into NASA (national auto sport association) they have a good program that can get you on track.
Old 12-03-2006, 12:36 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Glenn98ZM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i was told by a smart road racer who is also a pro, that you want to use as much gear as you can put in that will allow you to run 4th gear all the way down the fastest straight. basically, run what you can get away w/ that will allow you to not shift to 5th. but, i wouldn't go below a 3:42 gear. i wouldn't go above a 3:73 either.
Old 12-03-2006, 09:58 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Keep in mind that with the stock Z06 tranny, its like he already has 3.90's, so I would stick with that. Since the clutch is going it, it would be a good idea to go with an aluminum flywheel as itll help with the rev matching. I would also add a shift light. Other than that, your ready to roll as is.
Old 12-05-2006, 08:52 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Castrellon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DONAIMIAN
Keep in mind that with the stock Z06 tranny, its like he already has 3.90's, so I would stick with that. Since the clutch is going it, it would be a good idea to go with an aluminum flywheel as itll help with the rev matching. I would also add a shift light. Other than that, your ready to roll as is.
I was going to get a textrailia OZ 700 with an 8lb Al FW, but that's been "phased out". So, I opted for the billet steel which is like 18lbs. What's the dual mass stocker come in at, 30lbs? Possibly 12lbs less. Will that be a huge difference when rev matching or down shifting?
I've driven semi's at work and have to rev match, no synchros in a twin countershaft trans. These are all twin plate, dual mass set ups. Read that lighter FWs make for easier rev matching. Why? Less mass, quicker rev, less time on the throttle? This assumption correct?
Also, will I get more engine brake out of it than the stocker? Next best thing would be to talk Jacobs engine brakes into making a kit for my LS6. That would be fun. down shift and then Brapapapapapapapapapap!
Old 12-06-2006, 07:22 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'd suggest racing the car on a stock cam at least once. figure out where you need the power most, then do a cam. If you have stock manifolds, some of the off-the shelf grinds may not be ideal as they work best on a car with headers. In fact you may want to headers first.
Old 12-06-2006, 09:40 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Castrellon
I was going to get a textrailia OZ 700 with an 8lb Al FW, but that's been "phased out". So, I opted for the billet steel which is like 18lbs. What's the dual mass stocker come in at, 30lbs? Possibly 12lbs less. Will that be a huge difference when rev matching or down shifting?
I've driven semi's at work and have to rev match, no synchros in a twin countershaft trans. These are all twin plate, dual mass set ups. Read that lighter FWs make for easier rev matching. Why? Less mass, quicker rev, less time on the throttle? This assumption correct?
Also, will I get more engine brake out of it than the stocker? Next best thing would be to talk Jacobs engine brakes into making a kit for my LS6. That would be fun. down shift and then Brapapapapapapapapapap!
I didnt know that the stocker was dual mass. Anyways, I do know that the normal iorn flywheel is around 24lbs and the Al flywheel cuts that in half (assuming your using the fidanza aluminum fly, but the textrailia is even less at 8 for a loss of 16lbs) Any time you remove a significant amount of rotating weight from the car chances are it will be a noticable gain. With the flywheel, youll notice the engine revs faster and falls back to idle faster simply because of the less weight deal. You prolly wont notice anymore engine brake than stock, but thats not needed considering the car is already so light and with the right pad and tire set up you can most likley get your 60-0 distances close to 100ft. The onlyway I can think of increase engine braking is to increase the compression ratio. To me the addition of a jake brake would just be extra weight. Hope this helps and if you have any other questions let me know.
Old 12-06-2006, 10:31 PM
  #8  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I got into lapping on roadcourses almost 2 years ago. I've gone from a car with 560 crank hp ('02 SS) to a weaksause in comparison 232 hp RX8 (with a Stage II WRX in between). When I had the SS, I was fascinated with specifying a cam good for the roadcourse. I had a MUST GET RR CAM!!! Mentality. What I didn't realize was that I needed LESS horsepower to lap successfully as a novice!

Anyhow, once you get around to getting a cam in there for lapping, my research yielded something in the 228 through 234 range in duration (traditional split), about .57x lift, on a 110-112 lsa using either a Cam Motion lobe or a Comp XE lobe.

228/230
232/234

Were good ranges.

Last edited by SouthFL.02.SS; 12-06-2006 at 11:05 PM.
Old 12-07-2006, 08:30 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Castrellon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
I'd suggest racing the car on a stock cam at least once. figure out where you need the power most, then do a cam. If you have stock manifolds, some of the off-the shelf grinds may not be ideal as they work best on a car with headers. In fact you may want to headers first.
Well, guess I should tell ya what I got in my hoopty then:
LGM Longtube pros with the X, vortex CAI, bridge and coupling, muffler by-pass tubes. In a perfect world, theoretically speaking, about 427 at the flywheel.
Old 12-07-2006, 08:40 PM
  #10  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Castrellon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DONAIMIAN
I didnt know that the stocker was dual mass. Anyways, I do know that the normal iorn flywheel is around 24lbs and the Al flywheel cuts that in half (assuming your using the fidanza aluminum fly, but the textrailia is even less at 8 for a loss of 16lbs) Any time you remove a significant amount of rotating weight from the car chances are it will be a noticable gain. With the flywheel, youll notice the engine revs faster and falls back to idle faster simply because of the less weight deal. You prolly wont notice anymore engine brake than stock, but thats not needed considering the car is already so light and with the right pad and tire set up you can most likley get your 60-0 distances close to 100ft. The onlyway I can think of increase engine braking is to increase the compression ratio. To me the addition of a jake brake would just be extra weight. Hope this helps and if you have any other questions let me know.
Not sure. Didn't look at it too close as I had already orderd the new clutch. What does a dual mass look like vs a single mass? Wieghted tabs 180º apart?
Had a friend weigh it, 23.5lbs. Wow, I beat the hell out of that thing if I burned off .5lb of material. Friction is about 6.5 and PP was about 22lbs.
About 60lbs total.
I guess I'll take the hoopty to the local track at the first play day and see what she does stock.
Old 12-09-2006, 03:37 AM
  #11  
roy
TECH Resident
 
roy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mehlingen, Germany
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just an FYI
The stocker C5 flywheel is not dual mass.
Old 12-09-2006, 04:27 AM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Castrellon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How would I know one if I saw one? What's the tell-tale sign?
By the way, sent a PM to Lou and he said for what I want (solo, drag, street) the G5x3 was the best all around cam. He also recomends for all world performance 3.73 or 3.90. Don't go 4.10 unless I'm planning to road race at 7kRPM. I'm thinking conservitive 3.73's.
Wanted to put this up just for kicks to.
First C6R bought by some German dude, now selling for $750K USD
Attached Thumbnails Cam and gears question-c6r001.gif  

Last edited by Castrellon; 12-09-2006 at 04:39 AM.
Old 12-09-2006, 07:40 AM
  #13  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

^
I personally wouldn't use an XER lobe (G5X3) on my recreational road course/street/drag car unless maintaining a vigilant eye on what's going on with the valvetrain, and using quality valvetrain components (lifters and rockers in particular).
Old 12-09-2006, 11:33 AM
  #14  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Castrellon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
^
I personally wouldn't use an XER lobe (G5X3) on my recreational road course/street/drag car unless maintaining a vigilant eye on what's going on with the valvetrain, and using quality valvetrain components (lifters and rockers in particular).
Why? Ramp too steep? To much lift? Affraid of coil bind or bad geometry with the rockers? I was going to put some Harland Sharp rockers in it, new cam kit to go with it. Please explain. Now you got me all worried about what I just listed.
Old 12-09-2006, 03:14 PM
  #15  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Castrellon
Why? Ramp too steep? To much lift? Affraid of coil bind or bad geometry with the rockers? I was going to put some Harland Sharp rockers in it, new cam kit to go with it. Please explain. Now you got me all worried about what I just listed.
If going with a Comp XER lobe (yes ramp is steep, yes lift is high on the G5X3), make sure your valvetrain is up to supporting the cam, along with making sure the valvetrain is set up properly. The G5X3 is a great cam, and will outperform (as well as be easier to tune for) a similarly sized Comp XE grind, but if I were using stock lifters and stock rockers, as well as expecting longer spring life cycle and less maintenance in general, I'd use something in an XE grind, or something like this Cam Motion grind: 226/228 .574/.576 112 +4
Old 12-09-2006, 06:39 PM
  #16  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Castrellon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So, you're saying to skip the LG cams and go directly to the source for a 110/112 XE?
I looked at what Lou sells and they are all 112/114 or straight 114.
Won't this bleed off too much compression?
Also you said to run it +4 instead of straight up. Couldn't I just run a G5X1 +4, which is like the G5 I listed at the top but a split 112/114 but 224/232 and keep my compression? I've got static 10.5 to 1. If I go to 110, that's going to be more like 9.8:1 or <. Is that enough to have so much duration 226/228?

Last edited by Castrellon; 12-11-2006 at 06:15 PM.
Old 12-10-2006, 11:09 AM
  #17  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I think you already know this, given the terms you're using, but using 110 thru 112 LSA and advancing helps keep the powerband to the left, which is important when going with larger duration. If you stay with a smaller duration, you can use less advance (look at Patrick G's latest cam).
The Cam Motion spec I listed was something they custom tailored for me as a roadcourse/street/strip cam. It was for an F-bod, so, maybe you could go a bit larger (say, 228/230), given your car will weigh less.
In the end, it seems you're pretty knowledgeable and savvy around an engine, so perhaps using a G5X3 will be fine, as it seems like you're very able to check and maintain your valvetrain.
Old 12-10-2006, 02:21 PM
  #18  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Castrellon
So, you're saying to skip the LG cams and go directly to the source for a 110/112 XE?
I looked at what Lou sells and they are all 112/114 or straight 114.
Won't this bleed of to much compression?
Also you said to run it +4 instead of straight up. Couldn't I just run a G5X1 +4, which is like the G5 I listed at the top but a split 112/114 but 224/232 and keep my compression? I've got static 10.5 to 1. If I go to 110, that's going to be more like 9.8:1 or <. Is that enough to have so much duration 226/228?
Also, remember, the G5X3 is much larger than the LG cams you're mentioning.
A G5X3 checks in more or less at: 234/242 duration, with .60x lift.
Old 12-11-2006, 06:27 PM
  #19  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Castrellon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess, I'll have to ask Lou what the specs are for that cam at .006" since that's what my instructors tought me to go off of at tech school. This method tends to reveal a lil' more about the ramp. I figure this lobe is more like a trapazoid or square than an elipitcal shape.
Old 12-13-2006, 04:58 PM
  #20  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Castrellon
I guess, I'll have to ask Lou what the specs are for that cam at .006" since that's what my instructors tought me to go off of at tech school. This method tends to reveal a lil' more about the ramp. I figure this lobe is more like a trapazoid or square than an elipitcal shape.
Here's a G5X2 Cam Card (smaller cam, same lobe profile):
http://ourworld.cs.com/jrp98ls1/g5x2.jpg

XER checks in at 49 @ (.006 -.050)


Quick Reply: Cam and gears question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 AM.