Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Odarabla's infinite BS thread for the foreskinned (AKA Smack Down)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2013, 12:01 PM
  #21821  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by audacious nick
Nah bro, if you keep throwing timing at it, you'll always make more power. Just ask Automach
Where did I say this was the case?
automach1 is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:06 PM
  #21822  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by willizm
It's called diminishing returns. At some point adding timing is just going to plateau on adding power.
I understand that. I was just testing out the famed theory behind 1 million hp in the tune of the 5.0. My car initially gained 6whp from a tune... making it more aggressive did nothing. Same with the ls cars. Ive never seen more then 10whp come out of a tune.

But for some reason, everytime a new motor comes out, they always seem to gain a million hp from a tune lol. Later one reality sets in. I want to see what a C7 gains from a tune on the dyno. From stock to dyno tune. Call it mythbusters lol.

(boosted applications are different, im talking NA)
evangto87 is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:07 PM
  #21823  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by audacious nick
Nah bro, if you keep throwing timing at it, you'll always make more power. Just ask Automach
Proof?


willizm is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:13 PM
  #21824  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
I understand that. I was just testing out the famed theory behind 1 million hp in the tune of the 5.0. My car initially gained 6whp from a tune... making it more aggressive did nothing. Same with the ls cars. Ive never seen more then 10whp come out of a tune.

But for some reason, everytime a new motor comes out, they always seem to gain a million hp from a tune lol. Later one reality sets in. I want to see what a C7 gains from a tune on the dyno. From stock to dyno tune. Call it mythbusters lol.

(boosted applications are different, im talking NA)
True, but there are a few more factors at play though. If you take a motor from factory that is tuned to run on 87octane and tune it for 93 octane (timing/afr) and remove all the torque management crap it's going to gain quite a bit of power even on an NA platform. Not as much of a gain would be had if tuning for 87 octane. That fuel change is often not discussed as being the big differentiator in a tune only dyno comparison, but usually that accounts for most of the change. With all that said I'm not sure what octane the new lt1 requires but since it's di it's probably 91/93 oct
willizm is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:22 PM
  #21825  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

however i havent seen a "performance" engine that is tuned for 87 octane in quite some time. My GTO and Boss are both factory recommended for 91 octane. So hypothetically speaking.. if a car is running 87 octane on the dyno. Say it makes 350whp. Then you add 93 octane and make 360whp. That tells me the car is factory tuned on a higher octane that will switch to low timing tables the second it sees any ping. In this particular case, this is what Ive seen for the passed 10 years. Factory cars making more power on 93 octane VS 87 octane. If it was the other way around, 93 octane would have 0 benefit over 87 with the stock tune. See my point?

Last edited by evangto87; 11-03-2013 at 12:30 PM.
evangto87 is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:30 PM
  #21826  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Well transmission is out... pretty painless on a lift... Last time I changed the clutch it was on jack stands. Night and day.
S8ER95Z is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:33 PM
  #21827  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The problem is that the ignition and burn rate characteristics are different from 93 octane to 87 octane. If the motor is not accounting for that change then it will appear to make less power or no power on the higher octane fuel if the PCM is tuned for 87 octane. However if those tables are adjusted for the 93 octane burn characteristics you may find quite a bit more power than could be made on 87octane. How much though is up to the platforms. Many times though it's a multitude of things such as torque management that limit the output the platform could put out to retain better fuel economy, reliability or drivability.
willizm is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:37 PM
  #21828  
ASSuming On The Tree
 
audacious nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by willizm
Proof?


33 degrees of timing, everywhere!
audacious nick is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:38 PM
  #21829  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 189 Likes on 134 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

octane is for compression. not for timing.
big hammer is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:38 PM
  #21830  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by audacious nick
33 degrees of timing, everywhere!
I run 378* of timing. Get on my level breh!

willizm is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:40 PM
  #21831  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by willizm
The problem is that the ignition and burn rate characteristics are different from 93 octane to 87 octane. If the motor is not accounting for that change then it will appear to make less power or no power on the higher octane fuel if the PCM is tuned for 87 octane. However if those tables are adjusted for the 93 octane burn characteristics you may find quite a bit more power than could be made on 87octane. How much though is up to the platforms. Many times though it's a multitude of things such as torque management that limit the output the platform could put out to retain better fuel economy, reliability or drivability.
True. However, on a simpler level, from the dozens of different stock cars Ive seen dynoed and then be tuned....10whp is a rough realistic expectation. So far the C7 is gaining around 30whp from a tune only. Id like to see that in person. Just like 5.0s pick up 25whp from stock to the worlds greatest tune.... yea Ive never seen more then 15. The boss picks up even less since there tunes are bit less forgiving in stock form.
evangto87 is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:42 PM
  #21832  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 189 Likes on 134 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
True. However, on a simpler level, from the dozens of different stock cars Ive seen dynoed and then be tuned....10whp is a rough realistic expectation. So far the C7 is gaining around 30whp from a tune only. Id like to see that in person. Just like 5.0s pick up 25whp from stock to the worlds greatest tune.... yea Ive never seen more then 15. The boss picks up even less since there tunes are bit less forgiving in stock form.
if you drive a gen v you'll see why--- they have a low rev limiter. imo the extra hp comes on at a higher rpm than the factory rev limiter. just what I think from screwing around with the gen 5 truck engines.
big hammer is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:50 PM
  #21833  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
And i dont like the grand sports. I dont get it... essentially a grand sport is a z06 body on an ls3 car. But... it doesnt do it for me.
When the Grand Sport first came out, I wasn't a huge fan of the gills.

Absolutely love the GS now for the fact that I can get an LS3, auto transmission, targa top (big for me - I miss popping the T-tops off of my TA on nice days and going out for a cruise), the looks I want, all for a pretty reasonable price. The stock wheels on some colors need to changed IMO.

Yes, one can get an 08 Z51 for a whole lot cheaper and add the widebody later and other goodies, but the 10+ GS's are still a good performance value for the money in the used market.
Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
Well transmission is out... pretty painless on a lift... Last time I changed the clutch it was on jack stands. Night and day.
Update me, I'm a little late to this party
marc97taws6 is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:56 PM
  #21834  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
True. However, on a simpler level, from the dozens of different stock cars Ive seen dynoed and then be tuned....10whp is a rough realistic expectation. So far the C7 is gaining around 30whp from a tune only. Id like to see that in person. Just like 5.0s pick up 25whp from stock to the worlds greatest tune.... yea Ive never seen more then 15. The boss picks up even less since there tunes are bit less forgiving in stock form.
I'm skeptical on high gains tune only as well, but often enough the factory motors are tuned so conservatively to account for all variances in premium fuel where as a dyno tune on 93 octane from a top tier supplier could make quite a bit of difference. However if that same car goes to a shitty gas station and gets their premium then they may see more KR than on top tier fuels. Gm/ford/etc all account for that variance in their conservative from factory tunes. Not to mention all the drivability, fuel economy tweaks that are put in place to tote the line of economy and performance hence torque management nannies.
willizm is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:56 PM
  #21835  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
I might have to look into this. I am on a 2.4 upper, stock lower combo with a x-pipe and jlt but I am only at 17.5* I knew it was a touch conservative but damn lol it was 18* on the 2.6.
It really depends on the other factors within the tune that your tuner takes care of. 17.5 I would say is conservative in general, but it depends on your particular car. You have to remember also, that mine is a 12' with onboard wideband o2 sensors etc. The computer is able to make a good bit more "on the fly" adjustments as needed compared to the earlier models. And that may be what is at play here with my tune and the advance. I'll post up some details on my tune when I do a datalog. maf #'s, advance, etc. Also, the later models have frequency based maf setup vs. voltage based for the earlier models.
Poppacapp is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:57 PM
  #21836  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Camper
Poppa what are you considering perfect AFR? id assume you are in the high 12's?
perfect a/f to me would be 11.7 range on 93 octane.
Poppacapp is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 01:32 PM
  #21837  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Guitar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,925
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
Well transmission is out... pretty painless on a lift... Last time I changed the clutch it was on jack stands. Night and day.
*******. I just got mine all buttoned up on this cold *** concrete. Waiting on some rtv to put ny shifter back in and test.
Guitar is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 01:34 PM
  #21838  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 189 Likes on 134 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

imma buy a hoist this winter. all I need is that and a new car hauler, and i'll have all the friends in the world.
big hammer is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 01:47 PM
  #21839  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
427zm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
I just get a chubby everytime I see that Z06 in person. Friend of mine (old guy who never races) has an 08 Z06. Full exhaust, ported intake, ported TB, air intake, dyno tune, UD pulley... made 498whp on my dyno. Such an off the charts awesome car. I like the z51 ls3 vette. But to me it just doesnt have what the Z does. And i dont like the grand sports. I dont get it... essentially a grand sport is a z06 body on an ls3 car. But... it doesnt do it for me. I think the aura the z06 carries with it... is just what gets me. The same way the C5Z gets me over an FRC C5. Virtually the same car with more performance to the Z. But its just the package that gets me.
I agree 100%. The C6Z just looks better IMO than either the GS or the ZR.

Originally Posted by audacious nick
Meh, vettes.
Yep, meh. Lol
427zm is offline  
Old 11-03-2013, 01:54 PM
  #21840  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default


Still the coolest 4th gen ever! I dont care that it was at ATCO, or whatever... it is hands down my favorite 4th gen since it made these passes. Its badassery is the sole reason I will always be die hard NA
evangto87 is offline  


Quick Reply: Odarabla's infinite BS thread for the foreskinned (AKA Smack Down)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.