Irunelevens

Nobody is talking about road courses.

Poppacapp

The fbodies have always seems to have a better chassis setup than the fox platform. the s197 is a vast improvement. I was talking about your general cruise night on the strip, or dragstrip stuff.

Puck

iTrader: (17)

Drag racing wasn't any better for the Stang, unless you are only talking the first two years of that decade.

Heater

80's --->Mustang

90's---->F-body

2000's-->Mustang

20teens-?

ZNix

iTrader: (1)

Buicks ruled the 80's.. But then again, I might be a little biased .

ThoR294

iTrader: (6)

2000 is negotiable... LS1s beat mustangs for over half of that decade

Heater

Negative Ghost Rider

ThoR294

iTrader: (6)

I'm not counting cobras. im talking GTs vs. Trans AMs

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

I'm talking about performance.....all forms. The road coarse greatly exploited the lack of overall performance by the fox body's.
For sure on the chassis. My camaro rides so much better than the notch, even with 550lb springs on the front.
Nobody is talking about Buick
Right up until 2011 the ls1 laid the smack down on all the n/a mustang stuff. To be honest I can get a bolt-on ls1 to run with or out run the Cobra's.

ThoR294

iTrader: (6)

When I was stock and my buddies 05 GT was stock I beat him unless I spun. so I am pretty confident LS1s had a lockdown on the rest of the years

OVA1

iTrader: (12)

Well, The General Surrendered the field in '02, freeing up the Mustang to pretty much own EIGHT YEARS of that decades production…

But I picked up my '96Z in '05, with 150k on her, rode hard and put up wet EVERYDAY for 9 years… and I didn't see ANY Mustang Tail lights… All those miles and otherwise stock except for the K&N CAI, the '05 Mustang GT was a non-starter, same with the 06.

Once I rebuilt her, cammed up, geared up and finished out the balance of the bolt-ons, the stock blown Mustangs didn't do much better.

So, WTH are ya talkin' about?

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Nobodys talking about lt1's either.


As much bashing as they get you might as well kick the ford guys in the nuts with a post like that.....lol

OVA1

iTrader: (12)

No? So are you saying that what IS being said, is that to sustain the claim: 'Mustangs ruled the 00s', one would necessarily need to remove the LT1s from the 90s, from the equation?

LOL! Ok… I'd call that just about right. Not sure how that helps the opposing argument, but it works for me.

Heater

8 years of no production=8 years of no Camero's


Can't win if you don't make the car.

ThoR294

iTrader: (6)

There were never any Camero's. There were CamAros and Firebirds .

My beef with that arguement is that mustangs were still slower

Raoul-Duke

iTrader: (6)

You're a ***.

8ty8 LS1

iTrader: (3)

agreed mustangs "ruled 2003-2009" when compared to a camaro since they weren't being produced. however, my stock 2000 z28 a4 put the hurting on a bunch of 05+ mustangs. the mustangs ruled that time period by default, not because of performance.

Heater

Is that the best you got?

OVA1

iTrader: (12)

Nonsense ... The production vehicles from the 90s still owned Ford's production and still does.

Bring that pile down here and I'll be happy to demonstrate.

Heater

Your LT1 nonsense makes whatever you say invalid.