adamantium

iTrader: (3)

Proof? Didn't i shut you up already like 3 times before?

SI LS1 F-body record faster than 4.6 4v record
LS1 Cam only f-body record car faster than cam only 4.6 4v
H/C LS1 f-body record faster than H/C 4v record.

Just shows how much superior the LS1 f-body is over the 4.6 4v mod for mod.


inb4youbring up irrelevant power adder records.

MACHXLR8

I would have NEVER pictured you to own a Mustang! Is this really true or are you joking? You bust on Mustangs more than anyone on LS1Tech.

automach1

It is simple concept to grasp as of right now the 4.6 4v is faster then ls anything. There are many out there that have tried pushing the lsx to its limits but have failed to match what the 4v has done. I think the ls is a great motor but as far as all out builds especially on stock parts. The 4v reigns superior time and time again.

automach1

So let me get this straight power adders are not fair because the 4v design reigns supreme in all out builds

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

adamantium

iTrader: (3)

No because if you want to talk about how superior an engine is you talk NA.

Adding a turbo to the equation just gets the attention off of how sh.itty the engine is without one.

You said mod for mod right? Mod for mod NA the 4.6 4v gets trashed.

automach1

The fact that a lsx even with the aftermarket support they have can not even get close to what a stock cubed 4v has done on stock parts speaks volumes to the 4v superiority.

Razor01Z28

So let me get this straight, you actually think that the stock parts in that sissy little 4.6 can withstand the 2,300 HP or w/e that that engine was pushing? 52 psi boost, do you have any idea how much god damn pressure that is? Please share whatever it is that you're smoking, son. I wanna get high too!

Read everything that assasinator wrote, corky.

adamantium

iTrader: (3)

Now its the aftermarket support thats the reason why? Boohoo

I just showed you 3 aspects where the LS1 f-body is superior. Period.

The problem is with your agrument is look how far you have to go just for the 4v 4.6 to be inch out the LSx platform in ONE aspect that doesn't even matter.

How many of you guys will own 30000 hp tube chassis cars and drive them on the street?

automach1

So let me get this straight. A motor that has been looked over many times and Is confirmed to have said parts. Does not have said parts now just because you think it doesn't?

automach1

Lern2read the lsx even with the aftermarket support via billet blocks, after market heads intakes etc.. Is still slower then a stock block, heads, crank 4.6 4v. Anybody with a brain would realize the better motor at that point. It is not inched out It is leaps and bounds better. How many people are going to have 2600lb h/c ls1s with 12:1 compression and race gas. It goes both ways.

adamantium

iTrader: (3)

Again how many times do you drive your tubed chassis 20000HP race car on the street?

Your talking like if we were all seriously interested in all out competitive drag racing.

News flash it took you a **** load of weight reduction and parts just to get your mach 1 to MPH like a full weight semi bolt on f-body.

**** my buddy went 1 mph less than you with a lid and ported TB, and muffler delete on his all stock 02 SS on stock wheels and street tires.

His car went 107 all stock, look what it took to get stopsigns car to trap 108.

Idc what the all out competitive racers are doing, that aint me. Does that mean we should be doing what the top fuel dragsters are doing to our dailys because they are even faster then that modular?

NO.

92cobranotch

iTrader: (9)

yes its his. its termi swaped with t56.

Heater

LoL, and it's 4.6 powered


I still haven't figured out why he bought it, unless Notch gave him a smoking deal and he's going to flip it for profit.

adamantium

iTrader: (3)

lol your left overs

automach1

News flash I never once said anything about the streets. All I said was in all out builds the 4v reigns supreme with stock parts. Thus killing hihos dumbass argument about the 4.6 4v 4v being turds.

As far as my mach it went 112 at close to a 3500lb raceweight in a auto making less then 300 to the wheels. With a stock unported intake mani, exhaust mani, t/b, etc..... This same car was side by side in a roll race with a ms3, full exhaust, lid fbody making 385 sae and beat a h/c gto from a roll and dig.

92cobranotch

iTrader: (9)

price was fair, heater i left you a nice pic on ur fb wall lol

adamantium

iTrader: (3)

Dude you can keep that one unicorn of tube chassis car record ****. So what everytime you lose on the street to an LSx car your going to say "yeah but theres this one modular thats the fastest x in the x class". Who cares about that?

Personally, i LIKE the 4.6 4vs there sweet. I was actually trying to convince my friend to get an 01 cobra, he ended up getting a formula like my car for less than half the price of the cobra. I understand where hio is coming from though. He's talking about NA.

I used to have a honda the modular **** is really efficient.

92cobranotch

iTrader: (9)

turds N/A

automach1

Every car runs different if you want to compare joe vs moe **** on the street/track then we will be here all night. As far as all out builds it is set in stone. As of now 4v reigns supreme.