Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Mach at the track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2013, 01:57 PM
  #1121  
TECH Apprentice
 
NoHope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
that dash board just shouts ..... "street car"
lack of a dashboard. lol

I'm not really participating. trying to stir the pot some, I think I broke the stirrer though.
NoHope is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 02:15 PM
  #1122  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,937
Received 429 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Only idiots port stock manifolds. Smart people spend a few hundred bucks on real headers.
Originally Posted by Redfire 03
How exactly are you doing more by porting stock manifolds? Your logic is fucked up dude.
Lol...you stupid ***.....I'm the idiot but you just spent $300 on junk headers that could've went toward good ones like notch did. No wonder you got the results you did.

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Were not you the one that was talking about every little bit helps? Bet you gave Notch that speech too.
Yep every little bit helps......do you think there is enough little bits in that heep of yours to keep up? Go ahead port your exhaust mani's....nothing stopping you but the **** spewing out of your mouth.
Originally Posted by Bitemark46
Why are you so hell bent on tires? A mod is a mod. Who gives a **** what it is. Its a mod. Big deal.

You don't see sprinters running in Coleman hiking boots do you? Or tennis pros playing with diving flippers. Get over it.
Slicks are for drag cars......last I checked this is the street car section.

Originally Posted by automach1
Why would I be butt hurt over a motor like the ls6 that is not as capable as a 4.6 4v? Ok so you have a H/C/I Camaro.
Yours didn't.....lmao
Originally Posted by Razor01Z28
LOL, you truly are a dumb ***.
x2
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 02:18 PM
  #1123  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,937
Received 429 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
WHO GIVES A ****????????

Your pos runs like a turd and there are plenty of LS1s and LS6s that would **** all over you. So what does it matter about some 5 second car that you will never own? Stick to racing your own ****. Not some guy you have never met. and make your own thread to **** up.
Finally something you and I agree on......so what's our problem again????
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 02:23 PM
  #1124  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,937
Received 429 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
And theres nothing Ford about that 6.08 at 240mph modular pass....hell not even the car lol
for real
Originally Posted by Razor01Z28
Autocock talks like he helped build these cars himself.
right......he's a hell of a wrench.....just look how impressive his cars are.......
Originally Posted by automach1
From the old b headed combo that has went faster then any ls1/6.

What makes John's power and speed so impressive is the small displacement and stock source for major portions of his engine program. Displacement is 282 ci--call it a stock 4.6 liters--using a stock aluminum Cobra block; stock old-style, "B" dual-port, Four-Valve cylinder heads, as found in a '95 Lincoln; and a stock 4.6 Cobra crankshaft. Twin Garrett turbochargers supply a mind-bending 52 pounds of boost on top of an over 11:1 static compression ratio on gasoline!

Source: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...d/viewall.html

TROOF BOMBS IN THIS BITCH
52lbs of boost.....and your dumb enough to think the stock **** is holding together. Most stock modulars lose their guts @ about 8-10lbs of boost.
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 02:33 PM
  #1125  
Launching!
 
Redfire 03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Lol...you stupid ***.....I'm the idiot but you just spent $300 on junk headers that could've went toward good ones like notch did. No wonder you got the results you did.


Yep every little bit helps......do you think there is enough little bits in that heep of yours to keep up? Go ahead port your exhaust mani's....nothing stopping you but the **** spewing out of your mouth.


Slicks are for drag cars......last I checked this is the street car section.


Yours didn't.....lmao

x2
Keep porting those stock manifolds man. Remember, more with less!

You will forever be LS1tech's biggest idiot. No one will EVER take that title away from you.
Redfire 03 is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 02:52 PM
  #1126  
Banned
 
Razor01Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
for real

right......he's a hell of a wrench.....just look how impressive his cars are.......


52lbs of boost.....and your dumb enough to think the stock **** is holding together. Most stock modulars lose their guts @ about 8-10lbs of boost.
Every time I read one of autocock's posts I feel like my head is going to explode and lose its guts from 52 lbs of boost.
Razor01Z28 is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 02:59 PM
  #1127  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Where does this 12.06 # come from?
************......i'm now ricer quoting things that haven't happened just like adamanium.
assasinator is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:03 PM
  #1128  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
for real

right......he's a hell of a wrench.....just look how impressive his cars are.......


52lbs of boost.....and your dumb enough to think the stock **** is holding together. Most stock modulars lose their guts @ about 8-10lbs of boost.
My cars have always ran well for the mods. Modulars are faster then aftermarket everything ls motors with stock parts.
automach1 is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:04 PM
  #1129  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Razor01Z28
Every time I read one of autocock's posts I feel like my head is going to explode and lose its guts from 52 lbs of boost.
4.6 4v with stock block, heads, and crank > lsx billet aftermatket anything
automach1 is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:14 PM
  #1130  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,937
Received 429 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Keep porting those stock manifolds man. Remember, more with less!

You will forever be LS1tech's biggest idiot. No one will EVER take that title away from you.
That would be you idiot....now why don't you run along and play with yourself.

I've forgot more **** than know.
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:27 PM
  #1131  
On The Tree
 
Heater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LMAO, I can't believe the inferior 4.6 has LS1tech so worked up, just imagine after a few years of the 5.0
Heater is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:34 PM
  #1132  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Razor01Z28
proof?
lol ive chatted with him. .008" overbore MAX. filled block. moderately modded factory heads(ported with stainless intake and STOCK exhaust valves. . "OLD" stock crank with counterweights cut off and heavy metal used to rebalance. most recent as i recall is a billet custom crank.

really the block and heads are modded factory pieces.


he relies on quick revving and hard hitting 60' times. when i spoke to him , he couldn't spool bigger turbos and higher boost levels. his maximum exhaust gas volume is the limiter.


he does have a weight break for running 288 modular.


look fellas, its the turbo chargers, not the make of the engine. it just so happens the stock block and heads are usable.

if you can push 210 pounds per minute you make ~2100hp. the exact same reason a 275 renegade modular runs she same ET's as a 408 LS....they both use exactly the same rules limiting turbocharger....they just do it differently.
assasinator is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:35 PM
  #1133  
Banned
 
Razor01Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
4.6 4v with stock block, heads, and crank > lsx billet aftermatket anything
LOL you make a box of rocks look like a ******* college graduate.
Razor01Z28 is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:37 PM
  #1134  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Razor01Z28
LOL you make a box of rocks look like a ******* college graduate.
So you agree that the 4.6 4v has went faster then lsx anything?
automach1 is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:43 PM
  #1135  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Raoul-Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
So you agree that the 4.6 4v has went faster then lsx anything?
I agree that the 4v 4.6l is a queer *** lil bitch compared to a lsx anything.

4.6l 4v have always been at a disadvantage when it comes to power compared to a ls1.
Raoul-Duke is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:44 PM
  #1136  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raoul-Duke
I agree that the 4v 4.6l is a queer *** lil bitch compared to a lsx anything.

4.6l 4v have always been at a disadvantage when it comes to power compared to a ls1.
So if is such a bitch as you call it then why is the ls so much slower???
automach1 is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:50 PM
  #1137  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Raoul-Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
So if is such a bitch as you call it then why is the ls so much slower???
LOL The Kool-Aid is strong with you
Raoul-Duke is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:54 PM
  #1138  
Banned
 
Razor01Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
So you agree that the 4.6 4v has went faster then lsx anything?
Originally Posted by automach1
So if is such a bitch as you call it then why is the ls so much slower???
Are you really dimwitted enough to think that the number of cubes that an engine has is the only variable when it comes to track times like that? It took that guy 15 YEARS to accomplish what he did. That's probably about 90% of your life time thus far.

You're an even bigger dimwit if you think that anything on that motor was ''stock''.

And if the LS1 is so slow then why does your modified supercharged 5.4 mod motor run slower times than basic bolt on LS1's? HAHAHAHA!!!
Razor01Z28 is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:57 PM
  #1139  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,937
Received 429 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Heater
LMAO, I can't believe the inferior 4.6 has LS1tech so worked up, just imagine after a few years of the 5.0
Hell I don't think most of us is concerned about the 5.0.....I know I'm not. Notch's tag basically spits in their face......lol I never have been concerned about a 4.6, but they are fun to toy with when I'm in my truck.



You wanna know the screwed up part??????

I have the coolest Mustang here



More pics to come.....I've spent about $1500 on this thing lately.
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:58 PM
  #1140  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Raoul-Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Razor01Z28
Are you really dimwitted enough to think that the number of cubes that an engine has is the only variable when it comes to track times like that? It took that guy 15 YEARS to accomplish what he did. That's probably about 90% of your life time thus far.

You're an even bigger dimwit if you think that anything on that motor was ''stock''.

And if the LS1 is so slow then why does your modified supercharged 5.4 mod motor run slower times than basic bolt on LS1's? HAHAHAHA!!!
Boom!
Raoul-Duke is offline  


Quick Reply: Mach at the track



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.