2007 GT500 640 hp vs 2013 ZL1 670hp
#382
I'm not calling bullshit on your post or anything, but explain this 12 second difference at gingerman in favor of the GT...I'm just sayin'.
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews...r/viewall.html
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews...r/viewall.html
#384
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the Ford GT stats
0–60 mph (0–96 km/h): 3.5 seconds,[9] 3.7 seconds,[10] 3.8 seconds[11]
0–100 mph (0–160 km/h): 7.4 seconds[11]
0–150 mph (0–241 km/h): 16.9 seconds[12]
Standing 1/4 mile (402 m): 11.2 seconds @ 131.2 mph (211.1 km/h),[11] 11.7 seconds @ 126.2 mph (203.1 km/h),[13] 11.88 seconds @ 124.31 mph (200.06 km/h)[14]
Top speed: electronically limited to 205 mph (330 km/h)[15]
Engine 5.4 L Supercharged Modular V8
Transmission 6-speed manual
Dimensions
Wheelbase 106.7 in (2,710 mm)
Length 182.8 in (4,640 mm)
Width 76.9 in (1,950 mm)
Height 44.3 in (1,130 mm)
Curb weight 3,351 lb (1,520 kg)[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_GT
The ZL1 stats
580-horsepower ZL1's 3.8 seconds to 60mph.
Camaro at 12.1 seconds and 117.4 mph 1/4 mile
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._shelby_gt500/
Nurburgring Lap Times
7:40.6 Ford GT Markus Draper Octane Magazine[citation needed]
7:41.27 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 (2012) GM test driver Aaron Link October 2011 GM conducted test (10/2011)
7:37.4 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 (2014) Adam Dean October 2013 General Motors conducted test,[36] semi-wet conditions, video confirmed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...eife_lap_times
Everyone likes to bring up that ring so no excuses HIO.
But to help your argument HIO
http://nurburgringlaptimes.com/lap-t...times-top-100/
0–60 mph (0–96 km/h): 3.5 seconds,[9] 3.7 seconds,[10] 3.8 seconds[11]
0–100 mph (0–160 km/h): 7.4 seconds[11]
0–150 mph (0–241 km/h): 16.9 seconds[12]
Standing 1/4 mile (402 m): 11.2 seconds @ 131.2 mph (211.1 km/h),[11] 11.7 seconds @ 126.2 mph (203.1 km/h),[13] 11.88 seconds @ 124.31 mph (200.06 km/h)[14]
Top speed: electronically limited to 205 mph (330 km/h)[15]
Engine 5.4 L Supercharged Modular V8
Transmission 6-speed manual
Dimensions
Wheelbase 106.7 in (2,710 mm)
Length 182.8 in (4,640 mm)
Width 76.9 in (1,950 mm)
Height 44.3 in (1,130 mm)
Curb weight 3,351 lb (1,520 kg)[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_GT
The ZL1 stats
580-horsepower ZL1's 3.8 seconds to 60mph.
Camaro at 12.1 seconds and 117.4 mph 1/4 mile
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._shelby_gt500/
Nurburgring Lap Times
7:40.6 Ford GT Markus Draper Octane Magazine[citation needed]
7:41.27 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 (2012) GM test driver Aaron Link October 2011 GM conducted test (10/2011)
7:37.4 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 (2014) Adam Dean October 2013 General Motors conducted test,[36] semi-wet conditions, video confirmed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...eife_lap_times
Everyone likes to bring up that ring so no excuses HIO.
But to help your argument HIO
http://nurburgringlaptimes.com/lap-t...times-top-100/
#385
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
I'm not calling bullshit on your post or anything, but explain this 12 second difference at gingerman in favor of the GT...I'm just sayin'. http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews...r/viewall.html
In
3....2.....1
#387
Unless you're Hio! Then there's always a way around it! I just can't, for the life of me, despite the times he posted, absorb that a ZL1 runs in any way better than a Ford GT. I mean, the Ford GT is quicker than a Z06, which would mean what folks...
#389
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol I would like it if Dodge or Chevy built a Mid engine super car. Dodge would have the upper hand on Chevy IMO Considering Fiat owns Chrysler and Fiat also owns Ferrari so the SRT team could get with them pretty easily and bounce ideas and designs back and forth However this would more than likely never happen because both Dodge and Chevy have there Iconic cars that they would never out do AKA the Corvette and the Viper.
#392
#395
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had to fix, although Lawhead got a good laugh out of it.
Last edited by "MAC"; 12-17-2013 at 01:25 PM. Reason: didnt look right
#396
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Sounds like fun lol i havent been back to the track since my upgrades but my car is very fun to drive on the street and sense my dad is gonna upgrade his 69 Camaro some more then ima have to do the same to my car. Only bad thing is he has the money to blow me I don't so itll take some time till I can start upgrading again but always open to ideas tho.
#398
#399
That's what has happened since they don't like the results of the straight line comparisons.
The argument changes to show the git'r'dun Camaro coming out on top.
You better believe if the ZL1 was faster in a straight line, it'd be splashed in someone's face any time a GT500 was mentioned.
...and LMAO at HiO saying a 5th gen has better visibility, not even being a dick with the short thing but it must be height related...I sat in a 5th gen and felt like I was in a box with slits for rear windows.
The argument changes to show the git'r'dun Camaro coming out on top.
You better believe if the ZL1 was faster in a straight line, it'd be splashed in someone's face any time a GT500 was mentioned.
...and LMAO at HiO saying a 5th gen has better visibility, not even being a dick with the short thing but it must be height related...I sat in a 5th gen and felt like I was in a box with slits for rear windows.
#400
I like the zl1, but they should have stepped it up with the 2014 car. They knew what the gt500 is capable of. I'll take the zl1 over any 07-12 gt500, but the 13 gt500 is just a monster, and that's what I'd want. I also like the rawness of the solid axle. More or a muscle car.