Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Bolt on 5.0, beats 4th gen 427 stroker camaro SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2014, 07:45 PM
  #581  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Truth hurts...


Weight, physical size and power/torque?
If you are building an engine which is more important, weight/size or displacement? Would you not want the smaller/lighter engine regardless of displacement?
evan Irun14.2s here is the 302 in same config. The ls is a tiny tiny bit bigger than 302. It is what it is 4.6 is dimensionally a monster. But I don't see what it matters other that weight bias. The displacement is what counts.
92cobranotch is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:47 PM
  #582  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
OVA1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Like I told him, whether intentional (which I wouldn't put past him) or not, having all the pulleys, the power steering reservoir, and the alternator on the mod motor does make it look larger than it would were it just a bare longblock with the crank pulley like the LS7 is sitting. I understand that the LS7 had been there a while and the 4.6 had just come out of the car, but that doesn't change how the picture looks.
Yeah... I hear what you're saying Irene. But, Damn brother... look at that thing! It's a monster.

Look at the size of those crazy *** heads... which has to happen when ya stick a couple of cams in there, but THAT looks to me where the size issue is coming from.

It ain't Hio's fault that Ford decided to quadruple down on cams and put 'em in the heads.
OVA1 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:48 PM
  #583  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
OVA1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
evan Irun14.2s here is the 302 in same config. The ls is a tiny tiny bit bigger than 302. It is what it is 4.6 is dimensionally a monster. But I don't see what it matters other that weight bias. The displacement is what counts.
Yep!!!
OVA1 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:50 PM
  #584  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh I know how big they are in comparison to each other, I've pulled/helped pull both motors out of mine and my friend's cars. But they are working on getting the 4V packaging more efficient, hence why the new 5.0 is noticeably smaller than the DOHC 4.6. And now the weight between the LS3 and 5.0 is virtually identical. So they are getting a lot closer in physical dimensions.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:52 PM
  #585  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by islander033

I have no problems agreeing with that ^^^ as long as displacement is included in the formula.

Y'all are gonna be some cryin *** babies once GM converts to DOHC. lol
Im not look what ford is doing and look at what chevy is doing with their new dohc gas sipping engine. I think GM is doing just fine with the simple push rod engine the Corvette still gives other cars in higher classes a run for its money hell the 13gt500 does as well...
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:52 PM
  #586  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Oh I know how big they are in comparison to each other, I've pulled/helped pull both motors out of mine and my friend's cars. But they are working on getting the 4V packaging more efficient, hence why the new 5.0 is noticeably smaller than the DOHC 4.6. And now the weight between the LS3 and 5.0 is virtually identical. So they are getting a lot closer in physical dimensions.
hio said that bs the other day. I dont see it. Yea the valve covers look smaller. And the intake but still looks huge to me.
92cobranotch is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:56 PM
  #587  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
hio said that bs the other day. I dont see it. Yea the valve covers look smaller. And the intake but still looks huge to me.
substantially smaller

evangto87 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:59 PM
  #588  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Oh I know how big they are in comparison to each other, I've pulled/helped pull both motors out of mine and my friend's cars. But they are working on getting the 4V packaging more efficient, hence why the new 5.0 is noticeably smaller than the DOHC 4.6. And now the weight between the LS3 and 5.0 is virtually identical. So they are getting a lot closer in physical dimensions.
Correct.
Originally Posted by "MAC"
Im not look what ford is doing and look at what chevy is doing with their new dohc gas sipping engine. I think GM is doing just fine with the simple push rod engine the Corvette still gives other cars in higher classes a run for its money hell the 13gt500 does as well...
You'll see.
Originally Posted by evangto87
substantially smaller

Yep.
islander033 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:00 PM
  #589  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Any pics in a fox or 99-04? Im more familiar with thier bays. In those you can barely get the vc off a 4v 4.6. (Drivers side)
92cobranotch is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:02 PM
  #590  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lol islander please don't jinx GM
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:12 PM
  #591  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
Any pics in a fox or 99-04? Im more familiar with thier bays. In those you can barely get the vc off a 4v 4.6. (Drivers side)


The Coyote engine is 2" narrower than the DOHC 4.6.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:31 PM
  #592  
On The Tree
 
Heater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
kevin, you were picking his car apart. Aside from heat and wipers your car is closer than alot of ppls. You pick his apart when yours has senseless **** removed.I mean how much is it really gonna slow you down to have wipers and heat. < 1. Ive stuck up for you before with him. But why pick his apart if you have similar **** going on? And its hard to pick a race car apart for being a race car. You asked me if I thought it was a street car. And I described how its not. Like I said its closer than many others.


The difference is, I've never claimed it was a street car, let alone my DD.
Heater is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:32 PM
  #593  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I can see it now!
92cobranotch is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:34 PM
  #594  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
If they're both going into cars where they will fit with no problem, the physical dimensions don't mean nearly as much as you make it seem. If I was picking an engine to swap into a car with limited engine bay space (S2000, FD RX7, etc), then of course I would probably do some sort of LSx engine. But whining about the mod motor being physically larger is a silly argument when we're talking about how efficiently an engine coverts the air/fuel being injected into horsepower.
This has got to be like the 10th time we've gone over this. Please read carefully and do not use this lame excuse again.
You can mount the smaller engine lower in the chassis for a lower COG, and closer to the middle for better weight distribution.

Originally Posted by islander033
I have no problems agreeing with that ^^^ as long as displacement is included in the formula.
Not needed though.
Y'all are gonna be some cryin *** babies once GM converts to DOHC. lol
Doubt that will happen.
GM's been there, done that and have decided to go with the smaller, lighter and cheaper OHV setup. There have been a few write ups from GM engineers on the topic, ultimately they are able to make an overall lighter and smaller car (which in turn then performs better in every way) because of it.
JD_AMG is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:35 PM
  #595  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Heater
The difference is, I've never claimed it was a street car, let alone my DD.
that's probly because you don't dd it. He does. Yours is probably not on pump either is it? Reason I ask is because you said your opinion of street car is more strict than his.
92cobranotch is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:37 PM
  #596  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
This has got to be like the 10th time we've gone over this. Please read carefully and do not use this lame excuse again.
You can mount the smaller engine lower in the chassis for a lower COG, and closer to the middle for better weight distribution.


Not needed though.

Doubt that will happen.
GM's been there, done that and have decided to go with the smaller, lighter and cheaper OHV setup. There have been a few write ups from GM engineers on the topic, ultimately they are able to make an overall lighter and smaller car (which in turn then performs better in every way) because of it.
You must not be too familiar with the years 2010+
evangto87 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:38 PM
  #597  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
...Doubt that will happen.
GM's been there, done that and have decided to go with the smaller, lighter and cheaper OHV setup. There have been a few write ups from GM engineers on the topic, ultimately they are able to make an overall lighter and smaller car (which in turn then performs better in every way) because of it.
Splain why the ZL1 with less HP has a GG tax but the GT500 with more HP don't.


This is going to be one of the driving factors for GM to go DOHC.
islander033 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:38 PM
  #598  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Buddies coyote stock fox


evangto87 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:38 PM
  #599  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens


The Coyote engine is 2" narrower than the DOHC 4.6.
Still pretty big though, compared to a HEMI BB:

Look at that width!
JD_AMG is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:42 PM
  #600  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
...
Look at that width!
The ladies love girth, brah! lol
islander033 is offline  


Quick Reply: Bolt on 5.0, beats 4th gen 427 stroker camaro SS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.