The real deal, LS3 vs COYOTE
07-02-2016, 10:13 PM
#122
07-02-2016, 10:14 PM
#123
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's nothing to argue. There are plenty of SLB LS3 cars making 800-900 whp with FI.
I know you like to try and rial up the fanboys but it's really simple - If a motor makes more NA, it's going to make more under pressure. There's no denying this. To say otherwise simply shows you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
I know you like to try and rial up the fanboys but it's really simple - If a motor makes more NA, it's going to make more under pressure. There's no denying this. To say otherwise simply shows you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
07-02-2016, 10:15 PM
#124
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's nothing to argue. There are plenty of SLB LS3 cars making 800-900 whp with FI.
I know you like to try and rial up the fanboys but it's really simple - If a motor makes more NA, it's going to make more under pressure. There's no denying this. To say otherwise simply shows you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
I know you like to try and rial up the fanboys but it's really simple - If a motor makes more NA, it's going to make more under pressure. There's no denying this. To say otherwise simply shows you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
07-02-2016, 10:20 PM
#126
07-02-2016, 10:24 PM
#127
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm as baffled as you guys are. I figured if the ls3 was superior as Mappins said it was with FI compared to the 5.0 there would be more ls3 cars running 8's SLB and SBE than coyote cars.
Where dey at doe?
07-02-2016, 10:28 PM
#128
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also think alot of people who build Ls based engines figure if they are gonna run FI why not build it with a bigger displacement and a built bottem end since its alot cheaper, and the coyote is limited in displacement...
07-02-2016, 10:33 PM
#129
LS3 is superior. Mustang trans gearing is superior.
07-02-2016, 10:36 PM
#130
Arguing to argue. Easier to just lurk, shake your head at them (either side really) and just laugh.
07-02-2016, 10:42 PM
#134
You keep going back and forth from Coyote to car. Make up your ******* point. If you want to talk about 1/4 times refer to the car, if you wanna talk about a superior motor bring up horsepower.
The mustang has superior gearing, allowing its car to gain a better ET.
The mustang has superior gearing, allowing its car to gain a better ET.
07-02-2016, 10:47 PM
#136
07-02-2016, 10:50 PM
#138
There's nothing to argue. There are plenty of SLB LS3 cars making 800-900 whp with FI.
I know you like to try and rial up the fanboys but it's really simple - If a motor makes more NA, it's going to make more under pressure. There's no denying this. To say otherwise simply shows you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
I know you like to try and rial up the fanboys but it's really simple - If a motor makes more NA, it's going to make more under pressure. There's no denying this. To say otherwise simply shows you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
07-02-2016, 10:51 PM
#139
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No point in trying to have an honest conversation in this place anymore. You show the fanboys something and their argument changes to suite their narrative. First it was that the Coyote makes more power with FI, which can easily be dispelled to "Well it runs 8/9 sec 1/4 SLB, stock etc." So because the main argument was shot down, let's deviate to something with tons of variables to try and prove"superiority"
Arguing to argue. Easier to just lurk, shake your head at them (either side really) and just laugh.
Arguing to argue. Easier to just lurk, shake your head at them (either side really) and just laugh.
07-02-2016, 10:53 PM
#140
No.
No.