Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Ran a GT500 last night..nice car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2008, 02:17 PM
  #61  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 04Terminator
Seems to be a trend. The new Dodge Challenger SRT8 weighs 4140 at a MSRP of $38,000. I hope GM can keep the new camaro a little less portly.
g8 curb weight is also 4100 lbs

all these new cars are starting to make the gt500 just a little bit lighter, especially considering its got a heavy *** blower and DOHC
Old 03-25-2008, 02:22 PM
  #62  
TECH Enthusiast
 
BLACK2001SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PewterScreaminMach
Fixed.

haha na I'll even take your fat wife/gf for a spin haha KIDDING...... or am I?
Old 03-25-2008, 02:29 PM
  #63  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
z28voodoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cleveland Tn
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by COD02SS
What attitude? It's called my opinion. Am i not allowed to post that?
no...
Old 03-25-2008, 02:29 PM
  #64  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
matsarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 04Terminator
I don't think you are correct. MMFF got 12.2 out of the GT500 stock. I don't think a car that weighs as much with 123 less BHP is going to run a 12.2even with sticky tires. The 07 427R runs 13.0 on stock tires and to my knowledge is not available with an auto.

You have a link to that MMFF article?
most of the 1/4 times I've seen on the 427R have been in the 13.0-13.3 range. It's a couple of tenths slower then a GT500.
Old 03-25-2008, 02:34 PM
  #65  
9 Second Club
 
04Terminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Coast
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 88blackgt
g8 curb weight is also 4100 lbs

all these new cars are starting to make the gt500 just a little bit lighter, especially considering its got a heavy *** blower and DOHC
Yea, the camaro will share the Holden chassis with the g8. Between 3800 and 4100 is the rumor. Depends if GM has an SS version if it will compete with the SRT8 or the GT500. Certainly one would think the LS7 or LS9 would be in the SS.
Old 03-25-2008, 02:37 PM
  #66  
9 Second Club
 
04Terminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Coast
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by matsarge
most of the 1/4 times I've seen on the 427R have been in the 13.0-13.3 range. It's a couple of tenths slower then a GT500.
That is my experience as well. Takes a great driver to get a 13.0-13.2 in a 427R and a great driver to get a 12.5-12.7 in a Gt500.
Old 03-25-2008, 02:46 PM
  #67  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
matsarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 04Terminator
Seems to be a trend. The new Dodge Challenger SRT8 weighs 4140 at a MSRP of $38,000. I hope GM can keep the new camaro a little less portly.
I hope so too. I'm not sure what car makers are trying to accomplish, but thinking you can just throw a big motor w/ good looking HP numbers into a car that's a bloated pig and have it work well just isn't reasonable. Yes, it may go fast in a straight line but as soon as you hit a corner you're screwed. Porsche and GM (in terms of the Corvette) are about the only one who keep increasing HP while trying to keep the car at the same weight. Here's some good numbers:

Base curb weight on a 1996 C4 Corvette - 3,298 lbs. /300-330HP
Base curb weight on a 2003 C5 Corvette - 3,248 lbs. /350HP
Base curb weight on a 2007 C6 Corvette - 3,179 lbs. /400HP
Base curb weight on a 2007 Z06 Corvette - 3,132 lbs. /505HP

Base curb weight on a 1996 Mustang GT - 3,275 lbs. /215HP
Base curb weight on a 2003 Mustang GT - 3,275 lbs. /260HP
Base curb weight on a 2007 Mustang GT - 3,575 lbs. /300HP
Base curb weight on a 2007 Shelby GT500 - 3,920 lbs. /500HP

So over the last 12+ years, while everything else seems to be turning into a bloated pig, the Corvette is dropping weight while increasing HP and improving the handling, road feel, interior, etc.

BMW just royally screwed the new M3 for that reason. Yes, it's got 414HP now but it also now weighs like 3,600-3,700 lbs. and has lost most of the agility and other things that made it great.

Last edited by matsarge; 03-25-2008 at 02:54 PM.
Old 03-25-2008, 02:52 PM
  #68  
TECH Enthusiast
 
BLACK2001SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm confused because I've seen track #'s for stock C6 at 12.5 the Z06 i 11.8 what is this 13 secound crap?
Old 03-25-2008, 02:57 PM
  #69  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
matsarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLACK2001SS
I'm confused because I've seen track #'s for stock C6 at 12.5 the Z06 i 11.8 what is this 13 secound crap?
maybe someone fell asleep for a second..., in the hands of a half decent driver a stock LS2/3 C6 Vette should run mid 12's all day long on just the stock run-flats. A really good driver can get that closer to 12 flat.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:00 PM
  #70  
TECH Enthusiast
 
BLACK2001SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah that and the fastest ET I've seen for a stock gt500 was 12.9
Old 03-25-2008, 03:05 PM
  #71  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
matsarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLACK2001SS
Yeah that and the fastest ET I've seen for a stock gt500 was 12.9
I've seen 12.7-12.8 times w/ 115-116 traps which would put it about .2 -.3 behind an LS3 Corvette with about the same trap speed. Traction is definitely an issue with those cars.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:10 PM
  #72  
TECH Enthusiast
 
BLACK2001SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the looks of the GT500 but not more than the vett and preformance wise the vett kick the crap out of most everything and the Z06 is a super car then their is the ZR1 need I say anymore.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:15 PM
  #73  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well the GT500 and Corvette aren't meant to compete, regardless of how car magazines and dealerships like to paint them as "rivals." Completely different cars, for completely different experiences.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:25 PM
  #74  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
matsarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Well the GT500 and Corvette aren't meant to compete, regardless of how car magazines and dealerships like to paint them as "rivals." Completely different cars, for completely different experiences.
I agree, car mags have to sell copies and what better way to do that then paint the Mustang and Corvette as rivals. In a straight line they run similiar times and too many people are too focused on that aspect. On a track, they are two different things. I'm pretty sure when Ford built the GT500 they weren't looking at the Corvette and going "how do we smoke them in any arena??". The Corvette is built to be a top of the line performance car on the road, in a straight line, or on a track. To be honest, it rides better on the highway then my wife's 330i and it gets better gas mileage.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:26 PM
  #75  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah, I can't wait to drive the Millenium Yellow/black 6spd C5 that my mom is picking up today
Old 03-25-2008, 03:30 PM
  #76  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
matsarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Yeah, I can't wait to drive the Millenium Yellow/black 6spd C5 that my mom is picking up today
Sweet, have fun with that. The C5's ride good as well, but I've had many C5's owners tell me that the C6 is even better from a road feel/manner standpoint. GM did a nice job of improving the car from one model run to the next. If you haven't driven one before you really own it to yourself to do so, especially an 08.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:30 PM
  #77  
9 Second Club
 
04Terminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Coast
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BLACK2001SS
Yeah that and the fastest ET I've seen for a stock gt500 was 12.9
Average drivers at best. I've seen 12.5 personally. MMFF with Evan Smith got 12.2. The car is a gear and tires away from 11.70.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:35 PM
  #78  
9 Second Club
 
04Terminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Coast
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by matsarge
I hope so too. I'm not sure what car makers are trying to accomplish, but thinking you can just throw a big motor w/ good looking HP numbers into a car that's a bloated pig and have it work well just isn't reasonable. Yes, it may go fast in a straight line but as soon as you hit a corner you're screwed. Porsche and GM (in terms of the Corvette) are about the only one who keep increasing HP while trying to keep the car at the same weight. Here's some good numbers:

Base curb weight on a 1996 C4 Corvette - 3,298 lbs. /300-330HP
Base curb weight on a 2003 C5 Corvette - 3,248 lbs. /350HP
Base curb weight on a 2007 C6 Corvette - 3,179 lbs. /400HP
Base curb weight on a 2007 Z06 Corvette - 3,132 lbs. /505HP

Base curb weight on a 1996 Mustang GT - 3,275 lbs. /215HP
Base curb weight on a 2003 Mustang GT - 3,275 lbs. /260HP
Base curb weight on a 2007 Mustang GT - 3,575 lbs. /300HP
Base curb weight on a 2007 Shelby GT500 - 3,920 lbs. /500HP

So over the last 12+ years, while everything else seems to be turning into a bloated pig, the Corvette is dropping weight while increasing HP and improving the handling, road feel, interior, etc.

BMW just royally screwed the new M3 for that reason. Yes, it's got 414HP now but it also now weighs like 3,600-3,700 lbs. and has lost most of the agility and other things that made it great.

Safety ratings. The vette has very strong but light materials (expensive) used in a physically small car. Unfortunately I am of the opinion that we are seeing the new 'muscle car era' come to an end due to oil prices and a slowing economy. A 4000 pound SS version of the 2010 camaro may never make it to a showroom. I hope i'm wrong.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:39 PM
  #79  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
matsarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 04Terminator
Safety ratings. The vette has very strong but light materials (expensive) used in a physically small car. Unfortunately I am of the opinion that we are seeing the new 'muscle car era' come to an end due to oil prices and a slowing economy. A 4000 pound SS version of the 2010 camaro may never make it to a showroom. I hope i'm wrong.
I hope you're wrong too but I don't think it will be as bad as everyone believe. Truth is normally somewhere in the middle of 2 stories.
Old 03-25-2008, 03:40 PM
  #80  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by matsarge
Sweet, have fun with that. The C5's ride good as well, but I've had many C5's owners tell me that the C6 is even better from a road feel/manner standpoint. GM did a nice job of improving the car from one model run to the next. If you haven't driven one before you really own it to yourself to do so, especially an 08.
Yeah I've driven a handful of C5s and a ton of C4s (used to have one as a daily driver back in high school), but never a C6 . Gonna have to fix that



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 AM.