LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Question for you LT1 guys.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2008, 03:59 PM
  #1  
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
TrickFlowTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Question for you LT1 guys.

Hypothetically speaking here, if Trick Flow where to come out with a "NEW" LT1 head, what features would you guys like to see?
__________________
http://www.trickflow.com/emain.asp
Click Above for Product Information
Old 03-10-2008, 04:06 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
kahunaking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just ordered your LT1 assembled heads a couple weeks back and the only thing I would really ask for would be a 54cc chamber so that I dont have to run a domed piston for high compression.
Old 03-10-2008, 04:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
ThoR294's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

we need a new intake.
Old 03-10-2008, 04:15 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Revelation Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rialto CA
Posts: 4,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LS type ports, and ability to run dual springs out of the box.
Old 03-10-2008, 04:18 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
kierstyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I guess most people would like to see an aftermarket head that would bolt-on without knocking down the compression for once! I would like to see that and one that would flow like some of the stock ported heads out there but still have enough meat to be ported futher if needed. If thats possible you could offer a cnc'd version also.
Old 03-10-2008, 04:48 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
blackz6sp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kierstyn
I guess most people would like to see an aftermarket head that would bolt-on without knocking down the compression for once! I would like to see that and one that would flow like some of the stock ported heads out there but still have enough meat to be ported futher if needed. If thats possible you could offer a cnc'd version also.
/\ X2!!
Old 03-10-2008, 04:55 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 740
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kierstyn
I guess most people would like to see an aftermarket head that would bolt-on without knocking down the compression for once! I would like to see that and one that would flow like some of the stock ported heads out there but still have enough meat to be ported futher if needed. If thats possible you could offer a cnc'd version also.
x2 to that. if you could do it using LS style header ports (so you could use LS1 headers perhaps??) that would work to. Either way, heads are where the LT1 < LS1, you guys can change that

Id just like to see a nice aluminum head that flows well, and if anything UPs the compression slightly without having to do ANY work. 11:1 on a stock bottom end would be nice. Just ready to go out of the box.
Old 03-10-2008, 04:56 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blackz6sp
/\ X2!!
x3!!!
Old 03-10-2008, 05:01 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
gold98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah new intake to go with, smaller chambers, and cnc
Old 03-10-2008, 05:17 PM
  #10  
Launching!
 
The Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

54cc chambers (a must), intake runners in the 210 range, possibly slightly larger D-port exhausts, valves/springs that will handle an HR in the .600+ lift range, 2.02 Int/1.60 Ext valves.

An improved design EFI port-matched bolt-on intake, LT style "without" SBC water passages.

Next we need and aftermarket LTX block that can be bored and stroked to 430 CID.

WD
Old 03-10-2008, 05:29 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
MEAN LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jacksonville,FL
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

54cc chambers and upgraded ports would be nice.
Old 03-10-2008, 06:07 PM
  #12  
Teching In
 
TheBlackZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Engineer
54cc chambers (a must), intake runners in the 210 range, possibly slightly larger D-port exhausts, valves/springs that will handle an HR in the .600+ lift range, 2.02 Int/1.60 Ext valves.

An improved design EFI port-matched bolt-on intake, LT style "without" SBC water passages.

Next we need and aftermarket LTX block that can be bored and stroked to 430 CID.

WD
I 110% agree with him. nothing could be better said sir.......
Old 03-10-2008, 07:35 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
buffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^ +2 to the above.
Old 03-10-2008, 07:57 PM
  #14  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Biggin'89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: kc
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeliusZ28
x2 to that. if you could do it using LS style header ports (so you could use LS1 headers perhaps??) that would work to. Either way, heads are where the LT1 < LS1, you guys can change that

Id just like to see a nice aluminum head that flows well, and if anything UPs the compression slightly without having to do ANY work. 11:1 on a stock bottom end would be nice. Just ready to go out of the box.
The only problem is the spacing on the lsx heads, its not 1 2 1 like ours, they are evenly spaced. So then not only would you need the heads and intake but you would need a custom cam that would swap the position of the intake and exhaust to match the lsx heads. So the way I see it not many people would jump at that b/c of all the componets involved in the swap
Old 03-10-2008, 08:28 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

54cc as said, dual spring-ability as said, biggest valves you can stick in while keeping the low cc (2.00 1.58ish? 1.60 ideally), bigger exhaust cfm since exhaust flow is a bit of an issue I hear on our LT1s (I don't know though).
Old 03-10-2008, 09:15 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
Pro_built7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Engineer
54cc chambers (a must), intake runners in the 210 range, possibly slightly larger D-port exhausts, valves/springs that will handle an HR in the .600+ lift range, 2.02 Int/1.60 Ext valves.

An improved design EFI port-matched bolt-on intake, LT style "without" SBC water passages.

Next we need and aftermarket LTX block that can be bored and stroked to 430 CID.

WD


YES !


X 10


no seriously, I don't understand why the aftermarket has dropped the LT1, I mean if only someone were to comeout with some wicked heads, and a better intake !!!!!!!!!!!!! they would make some serious coin. I'd be in for sure.

but no... its all LS now......
Old 03-10-2008, 10:35 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 740
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by The Engineer
54cc chambers (a must), intake runners in the 210 range, possibly slightly larger D-port exhausts, valves/springs that will handle an HR in the .600+ lift range, 2.02 Int/1.60 Ext valves.

An improved design EFI port-matched bolt-on intake, LT style "without" SBC water passages.

Next we need and aftermarket LTX block that can be bored and stroked to 430 CID.

WD
+3

Originally Posted by Biggin'89
The only problem is the spacing on the lsx heads, its not 1 2 1 like ours, they are evenly spaced. So then not only would you need the heads and intake but you would need a custom cam that would swap the position of the intake and exhaust to match the lsx heads. So the way I see it not many people would jump at that b/c of all the componets involved in the swap
huh??? I dont see what re-routing exhaust ports has anything to do with the cam? LS1 head ports look like | | | | whereas SBC are /\/\ You could evenly space exhaust ports without changing the intake. If the intake port spacing was changed, i guess i could see all that. but you make a good point. Im not engineer. I couldnt tell you if it would be optimal or not. I would actually rather have a traditional style for the interest of affordability anyway... more or less just thinking out loud.
Old 03-10-2008, 10:41 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Yea, it's not fair the LSX guys get stuff like the 454cid option (and bigger I think on other combos)

http://www.worldcastings.com/prods_p...0_001_more.htm
Old 03-10-2008, 10:54 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
gold98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeliusZ28
+3



huh??? I dont see what re-routing exhaust ports has anything to do with the cam? LS1 head ports look like | | | | whereas SBC are /\/\ You could evenly space exhaust ports without changing the intake. If the intake port spacing was changed, i guess i could see all that. but you make a good point. Im not engineer. I couldnt tell you if it would be optimal or not. I would actually rather have a traditional style for the interest of affordability anyway... more or less just thinking out loud.
stop and think about what the hell you are saying, if you move the exhaust ports you have to move the exhaust valves, now they are on top of where the intake valves need to be, so you have to put them where the exhaust was, so the intake has to go to the intake valve so has to be compleatly differant now.....now that everything is in differant spot, how they gonna work? the cam lobes have to line up with the corresponding valves, so unless you had a single pattern cam you would now need a custom grind.
Old 03-10-2008, 10:58 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 740
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

guess that didnt occur to me. LS1 springs looked to be in the same spot, guess i just never looked at them side by side. mah bad rocko.

Also there are heads out there that run rockers on an angle

either way. stupid idea. let it be lol


Quick Reply: Question for you LT1 guys.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.