New discoveries for LS1 into Mustangs Swaps
#141
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did a search on the Corral and see terryr is a member there too. There's some info in this link.
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=112183
But I believe even using a Thunderbird clutch assembly, you wouldn't have room on the firewall to mount the master cylinder.
I'm using LS1 F-body Hooker Shorties. They fit perfect except the huge triangle flanges. I'm removing them and having some ball/socket flanges welded on and bolting it to a "stock" aftermarket X pipe.
Apparently 351 longtubes with LS1 flanges work great, though I hear you may need to work the tubes over a little to clear everything.
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=112183
But I believe even using a Thunderbird clutch assembly, you wouldn't have room on the firewall to mount the master cylinder.
Originally Posted by TT_Vert
what are the odds of someone producing an ls1 fox body header? Im not the best weith a welder. In fact my garage wont even support one
Dave
Dave
Apparently 351 longtubes with LS1 flanges work great, though I hear you may need to work the tubes over a little to clear everything.
#143
hmmmmmmmm......
I think the idea terryr is thinking of is to use the t-bird/fox body steering column cover/mount. The clutch master mounts in the hole right next to the steering column. I pretty sure the cover/mount would be easy to adapt to the SN-95 Mustang body style. You will also need the tbird Sc clutch cross-shaft for the pedal to link up to the master push rod. From there you just need to attach the hydraulic line to the LS1 T56 and go fry some rice
Look at the pics again closely.
http://members.shaw.ca/pekpress/HydraulicClutch.html
Look at the pics again closely.
http://members.shaw.ca/pekpress/HydraulicClutch.html
#144
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't really see the need to swap out pedal assemblies with the T-bird.
The F-body master cylinder could easily be adapted to the stock Mustang clutch pedal if there was a proper location and enough room.
It may be that Ford may have planned on using a hydraulic clutch at one time or another in the Fox bodied cars, but once the SN cars were designed, they knew there wouldn't be any type of hydraulic clutch, so they designed the car without a spot for it. Just my theory.
PS...I should be picking my car up from the painters this weekend (hopefully) so I should be able to make some forward progress on this deal. I'll post pics up of the painted car. Should look amazing!
The F-body master cylinder could easily be adapted to the stock Mustang clutch pedal if there was a proper location and enough room.
It may be that Ford may have planned on using a hydraulic clutch at one time or another in the Fox bodied cars, but once the SN cars were designed, they knew there wouldn't be any type of hydraulic clutch, so they designed the car without a spot for it. Just my theory.
PS...I should be picking my car up from the painters this weekend (hopefully) so I should be able to make some forward progress on this deal. I'll post pics up of the painted car. Should look amazing!
#145
Ls1......t56.......
It may be that Ford may have planned on using a hydraulic clutch at one time or another in the Fox bodied cars, but once the SN cars were designed, they knew there wouldn't be any type of hydraulic clutch, so they designed the car without a spot for it. Just my theory.
Well, this would be the reason to adapt the t-bird/fox body steering colmun mount to the SN-95, then there is a spot to munt the clutch master cyl. The t-bird cross shaft is necessary because the master cyl. pushrod pivot point faces towards the bottom and not the top like factory SN95 cross shaft.
Well, this would be the reason to adapt the t-bird/fox body steering colmun mount to the SN-95, then there is a spot to munt the clutch master cyl. The t-bird cross shaft is necessary because the master cyl. pushrod pivot point faces towards the bottom and not the top like factory SN95 cross shaft.
#149
abomination?????????????
what an abomination...
As 30th TA 0219 said,
what a jackass statement...STFU n00b
Now, back to our regularly scheduled kick-*** project!
Now, back to our regularly scheduled kick-*** project!
#150
02z28evlm04........................
Something else for you, if you don't like what were up to, don't read the posts! This is a conversions/hybrids thread, so it doesn't matter if someone puts an LS1 into a Yugo or Hyundai, Gremlin or Pacer, Kia or Mitsubishi, etc.
Why don't you just go back to your Ricer froum and dream about driving something different.
Why don't you just go back to your Ricer froum and dream about driving something different.
#151
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jbk240z
Well, this would be the reason to adapt the t-bird/fox body steering colmun mount to the SN-95, then there is a spot to munt the clutch master cyl. The t-bird cross shaft is necessary because the master cyl. pushrod pivot point faces towards the bottom and not the top like factory SN95 cross shaft.
#153
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 69LS1TRUCK
Just out of curiosity why is it that the cable won't work? Is it too short. What about having a longer cable made?
#154
Launching!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This guy is on to something....
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-swaps/342718-mustang-ls1-91-coupe-pics.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-swaps/342718-mustang-ls1-91-coupe-pics.html
#155
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CMcCarthy
If there were room on the firewall of my car, in front of where the clutch pedal would be, that I could mount the master cylinder, then I would mount it there and attach it to the Mustang clutch pedal.
#156
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.montecarloss.com/ls1monte.../February.html
If you check out the page above, John B fabricated a bracket that bolts to the clutch pedal, that the master cylinder attaches to.
I think doing something like this would be ideal. Attach a similar bracket to the Mustang clutch pedal and attach the master cylinder to it. My problem is that I don't think there will be a good location on the firewall in front of the clutch pedal to actually mount the master cylinder.
If you check out the page above, John B fabricated a bracket that bolts to the clutch pedal, that the master cylinder attaches to.
I think doing something like this would be ideal. Attach a similar bracket to the Mustang clutch pedal and attach the master cylinder to it. My problem is that I don't think there will be a good location on the firewall in front of the clutch pedal to actually mount the master cylinder.
#157
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Mystic96 i am doing a mustang Ls1 conversion as well and we at Hawks third generation are making a bracket for Ls1 pedals to fit in mustangs. If you want to wait. Check out my thread. https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=342718
#160
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cgriff97cobra
Hey Mystic96 i am doing a mustang Ls1 conversion as well and we at Hawks third generation are making a bracket for Ls1 pedals to fit in mustangs. If you want to wait. Check out my thread. https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=342718