Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

s10 ls1ers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2006 | 08:44 PM
  #241  
Bigdeezs's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by 97noma
hey bigdeez, what did you use for headers?
modified 98/99 f-body manifolds. I wrapped em in header wrap to keep the heat down under there, so they look pretty badass even though they aren't.
I'm probably gunna buy one of those make your own header kits and do it up nice this summer when I get some time.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 06:14 PM
  #242  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,272
Likes: 0
From: OH IO :(
Default

Originally Posted by Bigdeezs
modified 98/99 f-body manifolds. I wrapped em in header wrap to keep the heat down under there, so they look pretty badass even though they aren't.
I'm probably gunna buy one of those make your own header kits and do it up nice this summer when I get some time.
when you say modified what do you mean? are those the manifolds that are tubular steel?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 06:47 PM
  #243  
RedSpeck09's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

98-99 manifolds are steel. the newer ones were cast iron. what i did with mine was cut off the flange and weld on a pipe and put the flange further down. it helped with clearance.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #244  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,272
Likes: 0
From: OH IO :(
Default

Originally Posted by RedSpeck09
98-99 manifolds are steel. the newer ones were cast iron. what i did with mine was cut off the flange and weld on a pipe and put the flange further down. it helped with clearance.
thanks, good tip!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 10:52 PM
  #245  
Bigdeezs's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by RedSpeck09
98-99 manifolds are steel. the newer ones were cast iron. what i did with mine was cut off the flange and weld on a pipe and put the flange further down. it helped with clearance.
Ditto
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 11:04 PM
  #246  
firefighter's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
From: TAMPA by way of MIAMI!!!
Default

doesn't the S10 LS1 conversion manual talk about that?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2006 | 11:08 PM
  #247  
RedSpeck09's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

yeah. scott did it with his as well.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #248  
97noma's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

I'm actually able to get my hands on a rear diff. from a 98' z28 rather cheap, what I'm wondering is would that make good swap for my sonoma? I know i'll have to weld perches for the leaf springs, but what about width, backing plate to backing plate on the camaro compared to the stock rear diff. in my sonoma? Would it need to be shortened?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #249  
bww3588's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,139
Likes: 10
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 97noma
I'm actually able to get my hands on a rear diff. from a 98' z28 rather cheap, what I'm wondering is would that make good swap for my sonoma? I know i'll have to weld perches for the leaf springs, but what about width, backing plate to backing plate on the camaro compared to the stock rear diff. in my sonoma? Would it need to be shortened?
yeha you can make it work but its pointless. its no stronger than what you already have. youd be doing all that work for somthing that will break just as soon as what you already have.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #250  
RedSpeck09's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

it would definately have to be shorntened. the thing to do is just take the carrier out and put it in your sonoma. thats what i did with mine. i got a 2001 ws6 rear and took the gears and carrier out and put it in my s10. works great.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 06:10 PM
  #251  
XtremeDime's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, ALASKA
Default

or you could just pay like 500$ for a ford 8.8 out of an explorer. another good thing about it is if uget a 95' or newer they got discs. and a bunch of them have posi. the camaro rear would need to be shortened quite a bit. and ive heard of ppl with stock camaros breaking them. the ford 8.8 just bolts in but you will need to get a chevy bolt pattern and its about the width of a 4x4 rear so like maybe 2" wider on each side, totally manageable.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #252  
bww3588's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,139
Likes: 10
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by RedSpeck09
it would definately have to be shorntened. the thing to do is just take the carrier out and put it in your sonoma. thats what i did with mine. i got a 2001 ws6 rear and took the gears and carrier out and put it in my s10. works great.
why? that was a waste of time because its the same carrier your sonoma had in it.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 06:44 PM
  #253  
XtremeDime's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, ALASKA
Default

i think the camaro rear is slightly stronger but not worth the effort to do so.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 06:48 PM
  #254  
bww3588's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,139
Likes: 10
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by XtremeDime
i think the camaro rear is slightly stronger but not worth the effort to do so.
no its not. it has the same spline axels and the same diameter carrier. its made with the same materiels and same cover so it has no strength advantages. its the same carrier.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #255  
XtremeDime's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, ALASKA
Default

arent they 8.5" most s10s are 7.625"
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #256  
Jake the SSnake's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 529
Likes: 1
From: Iowa
Default

No, the only rear end offered from 1982 to 2002 was the 7 1/2 or 7 5/8 ( there was a "9 bolt" I think) whichever it is, pretty lame of gm to put that behind the ls1. I blew my rearend in my ss last year with less than 10000 miles on it also took my 4l60e at the same time
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #257  
XtremeDime's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, ALASKA
Default

so one myth is busted. when i was first looking for swap info they said my rear would blow almost instantly. you learn sumtin new everyday!
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 07:29 PM
  #258  
RedSpeck09's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
why? that was a waste of time because its the same carrier your sonoma had in it.
no it wasn't a waste of money. i wouldn't jump to conclusions so quickly. i had an open carrier in my s10 stock. i also had 4:10 gears in and i didn't want something so steep as i do a lot of highway driving and wanted the best gas milage i could get. i went from 4:10 open to 3:42 limited slip for less than $100 after i sold the housing. doesn't sound like a waste of time to me.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #259  
RedSpeck09's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jake the SSnake
No, the only rear end offered from 1982 to 2002 was the 7 1/2 or 7 5/8 ( there was a "9 bolt" I think) whichever it is, pretty lame of gm to put that behind the ls1. I blew my rearend in my ss last year with less than 10000 miles on it also took my 4l60e at the same time
that is not true. i dont know what year it started in, but late model s10's, especially with 4.3L 5 speeds came with the 8.5" rear. it was an option in the later years. 4wd and zr2 models came with the 8.5" rear as well. the standard 4wd model is like 2 inches wider than stock, while the zr2 model is 4 inches wider. the 8.5" rears are more common in late model blazers as well.

Originally Posted by XtremeDime
so one myth is busted. when i was first looking for swap info they said my rear would blow almost instantly. you learn sumtin new everyday!
and don't listen to that. i've been driving my ls1/t56 setup for over 3 years now. i haven't had a problem with the rearend yet. now, if you throw on some slicks or a real sticky tire thats going to put stress on the rear, it won't last as long. a lot of horsepower and torque will kill any rearend that isn't built to handle it.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 07:35 PM
  #260  
Jake the SSnake's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 529
Likes: 1
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by RedSpeck09
that is not true. i dont know what year it started in, but late model s10's, especially with 4.3L 5 speeds came with the 8.5" rear. it was an option in the later years. 4wd and zr2 models came with the 8.5" rear as well. the standard 4wd model is like 2 inches wider than stock, while the zr2 model is 4 inches wider. the 8.5" rears are more common in late model blazers as well.
I was talking about fbody rear ends Yes the 8.5 came on some v6 trucks but not the 300+ hp fbodys
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.