SSPerformance

iTrader: (76)

I never knew big stuff 3 and other internal engine mods are still cam only

vetteboy2k

iTrader: (5)

Maybe your sources are wrong?

BS3 sucks. I'd rather have a stock computer lol.

You know what it takes. You probably also know how it feels when people try and discredit.

vetteboy2k

iTrader: (5)

fixed it. thanks.

I don't have faith that this list will ever be updated so I wasn't too concerned about the format unless someone starts moderating it again.

SSPerformance

iTrader: (76)

I bet money that your not exactly stock , let's pull thoes heads and take some measurements

GARY2004Z06

Based on this, it seems the car fits.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...l#post10624588
"All times must be on stock heads, crank, rods and pistons."

SSPerformance

iTrader: (76)

Stock heads have stock valve and stock valve size

vetteboy2k

iTrader: (5)

I don't know you and why you care so much.
But I'm confident we can get the car to run the same times without flycutting pistons or bs3. In fact I would prefer a smaller/ lower peaking cam which would put me more in the powerband.

I cut a 1.464 on that 9.80 pass. If I ever figure out the launch it's gonna go much quicker. So what's next to complain about?
And my car is not even tuned much. I can tell you mu AFR is in the low 12's
I don't have a 4000 stall converter or a trans brake. My buddy cut a 1.22 60' with a 4000 stall converter in a street car with bone stock suspension.
So I have to overcome those disadvantages.
I can't fit a 30" tire or get a gear ratio greater than 4.10 so ever more of a disadvantage.
And try launching on a c5 rear..........
We can go on and on.
Bot now, at least, you have true facts from the horse's mouth and not some hear say.

We all spend a lot of time and effort to do what we do. I always give credit to people who run fast times because I know how much work goes into it.

People have different opinions of what's cam only. I get that and accept it. I posted in here, without much faith that the list is still alive, because we fit rules stated in this thread.
I don't make the rules or care what they are. I make sure I fit the rules and post my results. And again, it's just some silly internet stuff anyway.
If you ever want to know the truth about stuff then call me directly.

GARY2004Z06

This guy is a stalker. He has posted >10% of the time referencing this car.

vetteboy2k

iTrader: (5)

And stock valve springs.

But it doesn't matter. You ran fast for what you had and so did we and other similar cars.

The launch is holding us back. The performance is not dependent on flycut, bs3, or valvetrain.

The other cam I spec'd out will work better and I could spin to 7000 and make more average power. I could run a near stock valve train (aftermarket springs), have a stronger piston with a little more compression, and put in a stock computer and tune it well.

The car will probably run faster. But those things don't matter. It's not worth changing them out to fit some people's description. I fit the rules in this thread.

SSPerformance

iTrader: (76)

Your car dosent have stock heads there for its not cam only , also bs3 is a huge advantage with being able to tune each cylinder makes big power , nice try tho

vetteboy2k

iTrader: (5)

Under your definition you're not cam only either.

You really have no clue about my setup or bs3 and how it affects my car. I don't know why you think you do. I don't know you and I'm betting you have never seen my car except on a video loop.
Still not sure why you care so much. I suppose it will only be worse if we go faster?
If a car has bs3 they shouldn't be on the cam only list?
There must be more to the hating.

SSPerformance

iTrader: (76)

My car was Under my def my car was 100% cam only , stock rods stock pistons not fly cut unlike you , stock head gaskets UNLIKE YOU , Stock heads Unlike you , Stock rockers , Not hating one bit your just a look at me bullshit artist

firehawk 385

That would be a NO
I gaurantee you picked up 20-30 RWHP with your 8 widebands and cyclinder to cylinder tuning from your Big Stuff 3 that you don't like.

You don't have a legit LS6 "Cam Only" engine.

No LS6 came with valve reliefs.
No LS6 came with hardened rod bolts.

Are the valves and valve job stock the way GM sent those heads down the assembly line?

vetteboy2k

iTrader: (5)

Sounds like excuses.

I'm surprised that you would act that way, unless someone is feeding you lies and BS, especially after what you have been through yourself online. I just read your thread for the first time. Apparently you had stuff you didn't want people to know. I would never comment on something or someone I didn't know or know about. Someone not too long ago was telling me a bunch of unknown details about a cam only f-body. I was half listening but I'm now thinking maybe it was your car? Regardless I wouldn't repeat what was said out of respect and because It's just not my place.
And I'm not sure what your MO is and why you think you know me or my car. To make comments about me without knowing me is ignorant.

If the hostility is because of a silly internet list then that's just weak. After all there are 2 separate lists for different types of cars.

So you are still the cam-only top dog as long as you don't scroll down the page to Corvettes.

Your record cam-only time slip looks very similar to my (SI) bolt-on only time slip except you had a better 60' by ~.13 and ran in better air.

There's room for everybody. Accept it.

I'll post again in this section if we go faster as cam-only but once the personal insults start I'm done with the debate.

firehawk 385

no you don't

Only in your fantasy do you fit this thread

firehawk 385

I doubt it's excuses. More like your lies and B/S.

Better air? Since when does air quality effect E85 the same as a gasoline burning engine?

You are B/S from your 1st word to your last.

SSPerformance

iTrader: (76)

He's a legend in his own mind

GARY2004Z06

Update.
Stalker has now posted 12.5% against this car.

GARY2004Z06

Now that's not nice especially when he was extending an olive branch to you. I'm sure that you were very happy to hear that he moved on from Bolt-Ons. That 10.02 was getting too close for comfort. Oh wait, that BS3 made such a huge difference on that Bolt-On setup. Perhaps you may wish to read a little more on the owner/driver/designer of that particular car and past builds before making statements that are deformation of character. Instead you listen to some inbred from who knows where. (I have friends from WV and the stalker is too ignorant to be from there.) You guys want to make me

NSSANE02

iTrader: (14)

Makes so much more sense now. Awesome time! Any videos?

For the record, I dont see any reason that BS3 or any other computer would disqualify from this list. EVERYONE on this list has a modified tune, this guy just took it further than most. Does it make more power because of it? **** yeah... if that upsets you, go get a BS3. That being said, the bare heads should be BONE STOCK. Springs, pushrods, lifters, rockers, etc. are all fine with me (and fit the list), but modifying the casting should be considered heads/cam.