General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

any trans am owners ever get this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2009, 08:05 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1998_trans_am_ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default any trans am owners ever get this?

so today in class me and a buddy were talking about cars and he pretty much said my trans am was a nice car but they are butt ugly and he likes camaros alot more (he likes imports.) so atleast he likes some sort of muscle car. this is the second time this has happend its a either love or hate thing i guess you either love trans ams or hate them. haha but 2 people calling it ugly doesnt say much everyone else loves it.
Old 11-30-2009, 08:09 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
retardedpenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Everyone likes my car. Honestly though there is too much "fluff". Camaro's just have a much sleeker body line, with a T/A you have all that extra plastic bulk. But damn, there sooooo sexy from the front lol.
Old 11-30-2009, 08:09 PM
  #3  
myk
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
myk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 1,883
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

When the LS1 T/A debuted in '98 I thought it was the ugliest goddamn thing I had ever seen. To this day, I still think it's the ugliest goddamn thing I've ever seen. But you're right, it's a love it or hate it kind of a thing. I love the nostrils/holes up front and the muscular, sweeping angles and shapes. Whatever the designers were smoking must've been some good s**t. If you're not into flare and shapes then by all means go for the Camaro, which is still a hunkered down, muscular looking thing but not to the extent of the T/A.

By the way, the LS1 T/A is not complete without the WS6 hood. In fact, they should've all come standard with it...
Old 11-30-2009, 08:10 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
FireChickenws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Matthews, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Slap a set of heads and a cam in that bitch then see what he has to say.
Old 11-30-2009, 08:12 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1998_trans_am_ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agreed, haha
retardedpinguin- yeah as i stated also eveyone basicy loves my car with an exception or 2
Old 11-30-2009, 08:13 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1998_trans_am_ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

firechickenws6- haha he already knows not to mess with it hes says damn that things fast but its the only thing its got going for it, coming from someone who somtimes drives a g35.
Old 11-30-2009, 09:33 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

New sig......
Old 11-30-2009, 09:47 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
dragonrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They're both ugly. The LT1 Camaro was semi-decent looking. And then they put headlight housings from a Dodge Intrepid on the LS1 version. The T/A is even worse. Seriously, what's with all the lines and curves and stuff when looking at the car from the front? From the hood itself to the hideous headlight setup, they did everything wrong with the car looks-wise. I had a third-gen (89) then a 99 Z and while the 99 drove a million times better, it was uglier than an already not-that-great-looking car. (I used to think the third-gen looked awesome, and the 4th-gen has never come close to comparing looks-wise, even though I now consider the third-gen WAY outdated looks-wise and no longer like it.)

Why'd I buy the LS1 Camaro, then? Because of the LS1. And Mustangs (which were considerably slower at the time) cost MORE when I was looking. Slow and expensive vs fast and cheap but ugly? The latter, please.

Last edited by dragonrage; 11-30-2009 at 09:57 PM.
Old 11-30-2009, 09:55 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
828ls1formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

trans ams are sexy its that simple.. and so are camaros.. hell i like any f-body.. people bitch too much
Old 11-30-2009, 09:57 PM
  #10  
Rockstar
iTrader: (15)
 
Johnny-LT1-runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I'm on a boat! in Shreveport, La
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dragonrage
The LT1 Camaro was semi-decent looking.
LT1 Camaro FTW.
Old 11-30-2009, 09:58 PM
  #11  
myk
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
myk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 1,883
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I'm not trying to start anything here, but looking at the G8 GT head on you can see the design influence and heritage that can easily be traced back to the LS1 T/A. So what's the difference?

As for the LS1 Camaro, everyone generally agress that the 73 Camaro RS had one of the best looking front ends ever made; the LS1 Camaro takes that look and perfects it...
Old 11-30-2009, 10:00 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
 
NC01TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 3,681
Received 506 Likes on 365 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 828ls1formula
trans ams are sexy its that simple.. and so are camaros.. hell i like any f-body.. people bitch too much
+1. Never heard a derogatory comment and nothing but raves at every car show. Jealousy comes to mind when I see comments about our 'ugly' cars. To each his own.
Old 11-30-2009, 10:03 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
 
dragonrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

We all like what we like, guys. I can not see any evidence of F-body design in my car (at least not a modern Camaro, 5th-gen excluded since the G8 is older), nor can I see a trace of a 73 Camaro RS in the LS1 Camaro. And I promise you that nowhere near "everyone" would consider the 73 Camaro RS to have one of the best looking anything, unless you mean everyone on this forum. The amount of people that do would be significant, but the amount of people who disagree (including myself - though it's OK) would most definitely be more significant.

Jealousy? Don't flatter yourself. Not everyone has the same taste in cars. I've always thought that whoever styled the 4th-gen F-bodies should be imprisoned for life.

Like the looks of your 4th-gens? Good. Keep them. Your choice. I'm sure you guys find plenty of cars ugly that other people like. Honda Civic hatches, anyone? Bleh! See? Common ground.

Last edited by dragonrage; 11-30-2009 at 10:34 PM.
Old 12-01-2009, 10:18 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1998_trans_am_ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 828ls1formula
trans ams are sexy its that simple.. and so are camaros.. hell i like any f-body.. people bitch too much
agreed
Old 12-01-2009, 10:34 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
 
black_phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ls1 t/a is the sweetest looking goddamn thing gm has ever made imo
Everyone who has seen my car loved it...
Old 12-01-2009, 11:15 PM
  #16  
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
ae13291's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: san fernando valley, california
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

my friend talks alot of mad crap about TA's as well so hilarious.
Old 12-02-2009, 12:00 AM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
1995blacktattop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

IMO the best looking 4th gen is the LT1 WS6 T/A (or any LT1 T/A with a WS6 hood, like mine )

The 98+ WS6 T/A probably gets my no 2 vote but i just prefer the sleeker lines of the LT1 WS6.

on the Camaro side i think the best looking Camaro was never made. Chevy should have done a 96-97 RS/SS with the SS hood/spoiler and RS body kit and of course the SS powerplant.
Old 12-02-2009, 08:29 AM
  #18  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
69camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's your Fast and the Furious watching, Grand Turismo playing generation. A few of you get it but as a whole, you generation does not. Don't sweat it.
Old 12-02-2009, 11:08 AM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Juicy J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clear Lake (Houston)
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I personally think the TA is a bit overdone. There is just too much going on with it. I don't hate them though. I bought a Camaro not because I thought it was amazing looking, but its just a simple looking car that can be made to look pretty decent.

I didn't buy a 4th gen because of the way they look. I bought it because it is cheap, and has the best performance for the price. Its the same thing with fox bodies. I don't think there are alot of people that think they look amazing, but they are cheap, with huge performance potential.
Old 12-02-2009, 11:18 AM
  #20  
On The Tree
 
00fastta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Reason I bought the trans am over the camaro...IT LOOKS BETTER.

but seriously does it really matter. The main reason you all are like this is based on personal preference or the car you have. Case in point--me.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.