Bolt on 5.0, beats 4th gen 427 stroker camaro SS
#263
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
Sometimes I'll actually say things in an attempt to troll but not very often, usually my opinion renders me as a troll in some posters' minds.
The 5.0 vs the LS3 (engine) is a toss up if you ask me.
Now HiO will mention something about "yeah but you're cube limited on the 5.0" and he'll squirm like a worm when I call him out on him talking **** on "Ford guys" when they increase their cubes. Just wanted to get that out of the way because I knew a comment like that was inevitable
The 5.0 vs the LS3 (engine) is a toss up if you ask me.
Now HiO will mention something about "yeah but you're cube limited on the 5.0" and he'll squirm like a worm when I call him out on him talking **** on "Ford guys" when they increase their cubes. Just wanted to get that out of the way because I knew a comment like that was inevitable
#264
Here we go again comparing GM's flagship sports car to a pony car. How about comparing a 2013 ls3 Camaro to a 2013 5.0 Mustang? After all they have been direct competitors since 1967.
#265
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
Next it will be Veyron vs Mustang because Al Oppenheiser ate lunch with Bugatti's CEO and that now makes Bugatti a branch of GM.
#266
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the amount of money one would have to pay to swap out to lighter wheels, driveshaft, clutch, tune, gears, etc. just to get it to run with a 5.0, you might as well just buy a 5.0 to start with. Not to mention the only 5th gens worth mentioning are the 12+ with the Fe4 suspension and other minor upgrades.
This coming from a GM guy
Reality sucks
#268
Lol. He was on that one.
I didn't compare **** buddy, he threw out a big wide open statement about a ls3.
I didn't compare **** buddy, he threw out a big wide open statement about a ls3.
#271
Tends to be that way because the brand loyal realize what turds the 5th gens truly are.
For the amount of money one would have to pay to swap out to lighter wheels, driveshaft, clutch, tune, gears, etc. just to get it to run with a 5.0, you might as well just buy a 5.0 to start with. Not to mention the only 5th gens worth mentioning are the 12+ with the Fe4 suspension and other minor upgrades.
This coming from a GM guy
Reality sucks
For the amount of money one would have to pay to swap out to lighter wheels, driveshaft, clutch, tune, gears, etc. just to get it to run with a 5.0, you might as well just buy a 5.0 to start with. Not to mention the only 5th gens worth mentioning are the 12+ with the Fe4 suspension and other minor upgrades.
This coming from a GM guy
Reality sucks
#272
the ls3 is the sronger of the 2 comparing engine to engine. When you put them in equal weight cars the 5.0. Is just as strong because of gearing. They did one hell of a job gearing the cars. Shame the trans doesn't hold up.
#273
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
Funny how you responded trying to defend the LS3 but you still managed to **** that one up, you mentioned the Vette immediately and didn't even compare them engine v. engine. What are you defending, the Vette or the LS3? Like R6 said, you can throw the 5.0 under a bar stool with wheels and it will fly past the Vette. Same with the LS3 engine.
*** chap-age due to the smaller 5.0 is through the roof. I understand you had HiO hold your hand and kiss it and tell you everything is going to be alright with your LS1 Chebrolay, but you're allowed to still give credit where it is due I think the LS3 is an awesome engine. I love pushrods. I'm also aware technology is a good thing even though as humans we dislike a change in routine.
Oh yeah
Last edited by snake95; 02-27-2014 at 03:29 PM.
#274
Its actually quite a bit beefier then a t-56...
#275
Lol no man. You walked into that one. You know I had you there. Im not but hurt. I cant say I dislike anyone on here. You just didn't think before you spoke. It happens to all of us at some point. Sounds like you got a little butt hurt by walking into that.
#276
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
This is how it's apparent you're not that bright: you're trying to play it off like you made a valid point when in reality you just brought up a DIFFERENT car, and did not defend the motor itself, herp derp. You said the 5.0 beats the fifth gen but that didn't include the Vette. See my above response as to why that's irrelevant when discussing motors.
My original 5.0 baby seal clubbing the LS3 was said in jest. ****, it's rated at more power from the factory!
What is it? Does it irk you that the 5.0 is evenly matched to the big b-b-b-b-b-b-bad 6.2 LS3?
#277
#278
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Cause right now you're the retard or you would have one of these nasty furd combo's listed.
No they were not. They did a run of lt4 camaro's. But if I am not mistake all c4 m6 cars got the lt4 in 1996.
And the 2000 Cobra R was grossly unrated at 385hp. Many chassis dyno tests proved they made closer to 420 crank hp. Typically around the 360whp range on a dynojet. With simple bolt-on's like long tubes, full exhaust, TB, MAF, tuning, they're near LS7 territory in the power department. Those were some pretty badass 5.4L's.
Hio, you comprehend **** like a full blown retard. In no way am I comparing the Cobra R's 5.4 to the LS7. What I said was a bolt-on and tuned 2000 Cobra R can nearly reach the power level of a bone stock LS7, close to 500 crank. Not quite but close. No **** it has nothing to a modded LS7. Do you smoke something before every time you read a post, or do you have the reading comprehension skills of a stump?
You're just like the other furd miesters in this thread........here lets do this this this and this to the furd and compare it to the stock chevy stuff.
#279
Ironically... compared a t56 out of a cobra to my mt82... The hard parts in my trans are literally twice the size of the t56.
Do you actually know what fails in an mt82, and why they fail?
It took 850whp to tear through a stock input shaft of an mt82. And they have hardened input shafts out now as it is the weakest hard part in the car.
#280
I fixed my response above & added more to it.
This is how it's apparent you're not that bright: you're trying to play it off like you made a valid point when in reality you just brought up a DIFFERENT car, and did not defend the motor itself, herp derp. You said the 5.0 beats the fifth gen but that didn't include the Vette. See my above response as to why that's irrelevant when discussing motors.
My original 5.0 baby seal clubbing the LS3 was said in jest. ****, it's rated at more power from the factory!
What is it? Does it irk you that the 5.0 is evenly matched to the big b-b-b-b-b-b-bad 6.2 LS3?
This is how it's apparent you're not that bright: you're trying to play it off like you made a valid point when in reality you just brought up a DIFFERENT car, and did not defend the motor itself, herp derp. You said the 5.0 beats the fifth gen but that didn't include the Vette. See my above response as to why that's irrelevant when discussing motors.
My original 5.0 baby seal clubbing the LS3 was said in jest. ****, it's rated at more power from the factory!
What is it? Does it irk you that the 5.0 is evenly matched to the big b-b-b-b-b-b-bad 6.2 LS3?